@catahead said:| 12 / (x-15) | >5=> | 1/(x-15) | > 5/12=> | x - 15 | => -12/5 => 15-12/5 => 12.6 SO max value = 17 and min value = 13
with catahead we dont even need to explain!! 

@catahead said:| 12 / (x-15) | >5=> | 1/(x-15) | > 5/12=> | x - 15 | => -12/5 => 15-12/5 => 12.6 SO max value = 17 and min value = 13

@raopradeep said:find the complete range of x for which (x^2+x+1)^2x (-inf,0)(0, inf)(1 ,inf)(-inf ,-1)
@raopradeep said:what is the difference between the largest and smallest integer that satisfies the inequality|12/(x-15)|>54362
@raopradeep said:@ishu1991 bro answer is in integer not in fraction oa is 4
@DeAdLy said:arey vaibhav glat answer hai yar...its not correct
@ankittripathi said:for simple interest, the amount borrowed is the principal for the entire period of borrowing.Courtesy: Arun sharma. ( first page of interest chapter)Main to hamesha yahi use karta hun....answer bhi correct aa hi jaate hain.... but still its better if we confirm it from someone else.
@pratskool said:it should be the number of 3 digit factors of the difference of two numbers...13914 - 12714 = 1200100,120,150,200,240,480,600.... 7 numbers?? sorry if i missed any
@ankittripathi said:Please clarify......I have already solved the question and got correct answer.... but would love to know ur approach
@bs0409 said:A loan of 180000 requires an annual EMI of 17285 per year. So the person is paying a total amount of 17285*21=362991 out of which 180000 is Principal.So Interest paid=362991-180000=182991 which is obviously less than the given amt of 270900.Even if interest rate decreases to 7% after some period, the amt of 182991 will only decrease and never increase to 270900......
@bs0409 said:Not possible.....At flat 7.5%, the EMi comes out to be 17285So total amt. paid=17,285*21=362991So Interest paid=362991-180000=182991But it is given that he paid interest of Rs. 270900....??????????
@ishu1991 said:yar i missed the integer part its 17-13=4
@ankittripathi said:how did you calculate the EMI?
@bs0409 said:If you form a subset of integers chosen from between 1 to 3000, such that no two integers add up to a multiple of nine, what can be the maximum number of elements in the subset.a.1668 b.1332 c.1333 d.1334
@bs0409 said:If you form a subset of integers chosen from between 1 to 3000, such that no two integers add up to a multiple of nine, what can be the maximum number of elements in the subset.a.1668 b.1332 c.1333 d.1334
@bs0409 said:If you form a subset of integers chosen from between 1 to 3000, such that no two integers add up to a multiple of nine, what can be the maximum number of elements in the subset.a.1668 b.1332 c.1333 d.1334
@bs0409 said:If you form a subset of integers chosen from between 1 to 3000, such that no two integers add up to a multiple of nine, what can be the maximum number of elements in the subset.a.1668 b.1332 c.1333 d.1334
@bs0409 said:If you form a subset of integers chosen from between 1 to 3000, such that no two integers add up to a multiple of nine, what can be the maximum number of elements in the subset.a.1668 b.1332 c.1333 d.1334
@DeAdLy said:1332
@ScareCrow28 said:Nos os the form 9k+1, 9k+2, 9k+3, 9k+4 and 1 no of form 9k would be included.9k+1 --- 333 nos9k+2 --- 334 nos9k+3 --- 3339k+4 --- 333Total = 333*3 + 334 + 1 = 1334
@catahead said:The number of multiplesof 9 are 333Now we have to take numbers like 9k+2N where N is an integer so that 2n is even and we will not get another multiples of 9So 9k+2,9k+4,9K+6.9k+8So 334,333,333,333Hence 1333
@pratskool said:1,2,3,4...., 10,11,12,13... 4 numbers out of every 9 numbers3000/9 = 333 + 3/9so 333*4 + 3 -2 as 1 and 3000 are not included...1333 not sure though
@Logrhythm said: