For IIM's, IIT's and Other top B-schools.. Should the letter of reference or Recommendation from employer (Manager or supervisor) be produced ? is it mandatory? .. if produced would it be advantageous ?
There are no Reco or SOP required in the process. I remember some year back IIMB used to send you a booklet to fill up if you get a call. definitely not for other IIMs. Those things are required for Executive MBA where profile and work ex matters.
FYI, IIMB still requires an SOP and 3 Letter of Recommendation in a specified format - mails are sent to the referees directly and they will respond directly to PGP Office. IIMK required us to name 2 referees who might be contacted later .
But all these are required after you get the interview calls from the respective institutes.And in case you are working - it is always better if you can name your manager/supervisor as a referee - though I admit it might not be always feasible.
they told me that first all the complaints are attended...each and every question is solved by the concerned authorities ( IIM ) again to check whether they are correct or not...than all the dubious questns are removed and the scores are accordingly scaled...according to him this is what takes 2 months for them to generate the results...yeh short mein bataya maine...
its really curious how they would scale, if they scale by giving all the candidates appearing on that day marks for that question, it would be unfair for those who did not have that day, if they do not give marks then it would be unfair for those who had that day, if they give marks for whoever has attempted, then it would be unfair for those who left it thinking the question is wrong,... however they say and try this is seriously flawed, and in an exam where 3-4 marks can create or destroy history, they really cannot justify and get away with it
its really curious how they would scale, if they scale by giving all the candidates appearing on that day marks for that question, it would be unfair for those who did not have that day, if they do not give marks then it would be unfair for those who had that day, if they give marks for whoever has attempted, then it would be unfair for those who left it thinking the question is wrong,... however they say and try this is seriously flawed, and in an exam where 3-4 marks can create or destroy history, they really cannot justify and get away with it
sir itna bhavuk mat hoon...its a part of the game...v guys are at the lower part of the ladder...and can't help it...so better stay happy...and 4get this....
FYI, IIMB still requires an SOP and 3 Letter of Recommendation in a specified format - mails are sent to the referees directly and they will respond directly to PGP Office. IIMK required us to name 2 referees who might be contacted later .But all these are required after you get the interview calls from the respective institutes.And in case you are working - it is always better if you can name your manager/supervisor as a referee - though I admit it might not be always feasible.
its really curious how they would scale, if they scale by giving all the candidates appearing on that day marks for that question, it would be unfair for those who did not have that day, if they do not give marks then it would be unfair for those who had that day, if they give marks for whoever has attempted, then it would be unfair for those who left it thinking the question is wrong,... however they say and try this is seriously flawed, and in an exam where 3-4 marks can create or destroy history, they really cannot justify and get away with it
its really curious how they would scale, if they scale by giving all the candidates appearing on that day marks for that question, it would be unfair for those who did not have that day, if they do not give marks then it would be unfair for those who had that day, if they give marks for whoever has attempted, then it would be unfair for those who left it thinking the question is wrong,... however they say and try this is seriously flawed, and in an exam where 3-4 marks can create or destroy history, they really cannot justify and get away with it
" Hi bi san sana san sain sain would you like to have chai?"Sahi bata ?? cat 2008 mein 2:30 ghante ka paper tha aur 105 pe 99 the ...is baar 2:20 ghante ka paper tha ab bol sahi se bata
lol dude mai koi %predictor to hun nahi par 99.3-4 aa jaayega itne pe...2008 me kaafi questions aate the so u had the luxury of choosing questions
u are underprepared and i am not prepared at all...but v guys are still good enuf to master IIFT...just stay chill for those 120 mins...and i aint taking any pressure...aaram se dunga and i kno i can ace it...
yaar bhot zyada faad paper tha ..especially 25th and 31st
Dude but that is a personal perception...u don't kno what the actual stats are...so u really cannot comment on the difficulty thing...bettr forget CAT now...v alrdy hv had umpteen discussions over this thing...time to take rest...
u are underprepared and i am not prepared at all...but v guys are still good enuf to master IIFT...just stay chill for those 120 mins...and i aint taking any pressure...aaram se dunga and i kno i can ace it...
Not prepared ka definition?:p Mera underprepared ka definition hai literally 4 hours padhai. 2010 and 2011 ke papers. Full stop.
. IIMK required us to name 2 referees who might be contacted later 
.
