3 8 7
9 6 3
2 ? 12
- 3
- 4
- 7
- 6
0 voters
Please koi help kare....ssc CHSL ka admit card nehi mil raha ,Central region ka contact number kisike pass ho,voh bhi utane wala,toh pls batade...exam nov 2 ko he :(
- …
0 voters
choose the correct alternative....
I prevailed on him to vote for you.
to / at / upon / no improvement
Mr Dev will not go to the wedding reception without being called.
a) if he is not invited
b) till he is invited
c) unless he is invited
d) no impr.
as Rees was going to town in the high street a savage dog attacked him and bit him.
a) going to town a savage dog attacked him and bit him in the high street
b) in the high street a savage dog attacked him and bit him in the town
c) going to town in the high street a savage dog bit him and attacked him
d) no impr.
wid explanation please........
the office is soon to be closed.
a) just to
b) about to
c) immediately to
d) no impr.
last one........
find error
it is I/ who is reponsible / for the delay/ no error.
Please share Paramount Answer key 26 oct morning session
Which was the largest Indian site of Indus Civilization ?
- Dholavira
- Lothal
- Mohenjodaro
- Chanhudaro
0 voters
Arre yaar 88.25 Number as rage Thai ur, zindagi jhand hogayi. 15 Office kaise na kaise chutti leke raat din ek kardiye the. Very depressed. kya Karen Abe very confused
early bird catches the worm or the early bid catches the worm,which one is right?
to score brownie points:
- to get praise and approval for the work done
0 voters
http://ssc.nic.in/press-release/cgl%20re%20exam.pdf
wats this...do ssc conduct separate exam for all these roll no.,ticket no. mismatch candidates every time ?
Bhaiyo aaj 30 oct h..lodhi road kon kon ja rha h....
bhaiyo konsi website prefer karte ho gk aur current affaris ke liye..
The books he wrote:
Zabibah and the King -2000
. The Fortified Castle - 2001
. Men and the City - 2002
. Begone, Demons (a.k.a. Get Out of Here, Curse You!) - 2003
Who is the author?
What does the term greenwash mean?
A recent department of personnel and training (DoPT) memorandum, directing all ministries and government departments to upload applications received under the Right to Information (RTI) Act and replies given on their websites, has opened a Pandora's box.
Owing to lack of clarity in this circular, several RTI activists and legal experts fear the process may result in disclosure of applicants' names and endanger them. Some others, though, say such a disclosure is in the interest of transparency.
Uploading RTI applications and replies (including appeals) is expected to bring in transparency. Further, it will avoid queries on information already available in public domain. However, the DoPT memorandum dated October 21 makes no specific mention of whether information seekers' personal details will be revealed while uploading their queries, thus sparking off fears.
If names are revealed, there are fears that RTI activists could face attacks. Till date, around 42 RTI activists have been murdered and over 300 assaulted, says Venkatesh Nayak, RTI activist and programme coordinator at the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative.
"India doesn't have overarching privacy laws like the UK's Data Protection Act," says Nayak. In the UK, replies to queries given to applicants under the Freedom of Information Act (akin to our RTI Act) are uploaded with applicants' names blanked out. However, RTI applicants' identity could possibly be protected by an earlier DoPT memorandum issued on January 6, based on a Calcutta high court order.
This order held that applicants need not disclose any personal details while filing RTI queries, other than their post office (PO) box numbers. Government bodies could insist on personal details, only if they are faced any difficulty with the PO box number. In this scenario, though, the court stated: "It would be the solemn duty of the authorities to hide such information, particularly from their websites so that people at large would not know of the applicant's personal details."
However, a high court order, unlike that of the Supreme Court is not the law of the land. "DoPT's memorandum based on the Calcutta high court order and its recent memorandum are only binding on the DoPT. It would only have 'persuasive powers' on other government departments and ministries. Thus, a ministry can choose to upload RTI queries with or without applicants' names or choose not to upload any RTI query, because DoPT's OMs strictly speaking are only guidelines and not law," says Nayak.
TOI spoke with a few officials from various ministries who agree that a clarification regarding disclosure of the applicant's name would be helpful.
"If India wants to protect RTI activists' identity, it must amend the RTI Act or pass a government-notified rule on the matter," adds Nayak.
Opinion is divided on the need to do so. "Responses to RTI queries are public documents. Information should be denied only as per exemptions in the Act and no general exemption can be sought for the names of RTI applicants," says Shailesh Gandhi, RTI activist and former Central Information Commissioner.
"Everyone who takes on powerful interests, whether or not they use RTI, put themselves in danger. Why should RTI activists have separate protection? We are trying to create better systems for all and not create a new class of VIPs," says Gandhi.
"If very sensitive information is asked for we are aware of the fact that it is usually not provided by the PIO and during the process of appeals the applicant's name is leaked to the affected party. Unfortunately, this will continue irrespective of whether peoples' names are on government websites. A very few (probably less than 1% to 2%) do use RTI to harass officers or get a favour. Displaying the RTIs would deter them," he says.
CHSL ki admit card nehi mil raha,if anybody knows contact details of central region,pls help.