@kinji.at.pg1 could you please divert people to cat'15 threads by closing all old threads.
guys please post your questions here.
http://www.pagalguy.com/discussions/official-verbal-thread-cat-2015-30378583
guys which one is better test series -Time or IMS ?
hi guys..
I have taken just 11 mocks in Test Gym Adaptive of LR.. and it is showing me that they are out of questions for intermediate and advanced level questions...is it really the case or is there a technical glitch... Please share your views..
Which is the best combination of test series with IMS eTest Series????
PS - In serious dilemma. Need immediate help before its too late to reap the benefits of the test series.
- Others(if any, please specify)
- CL Cat TS
- CL Cat + Non Cat TS
- Aimcat Basic
- Aimcat Advance
0 voters
Any good source to practise rc??? Any leads would be appreciated!!!!
what is the difference between would rather and would rather that?
Friends I want to increase my vocabulary and RC apart from reading news papers and book.. Can any one suggest other methods.. Thanks in advance :)
guys help me.........there are two books available in market for qa by nishit k sinha......which one to buy???????one with green cover, second edition and other with black cover.......really confused....
Hello everybody ,,,,,
I need ur help>>
I got the TIME coaching books courtesy of
http://www.pagalguy.com/@niharika.b
, but i think some books are missing as also told by her(BTW she wasn't sure) ..
Will u guys check below n tell me wot r d missing books if any :
I have the following TIME books wid me rite now : -
Quant
1- SM1001409 Basic Study Material( Quantitative Ability)
2- SM1001501 Basic Study Material( Quantitative Ability)
3-SM1001561 Basic Study Material( Solutions for SM1001501)
4- SM1001507 Basic Study Material( Quantitative Ability)
5- SM1001562 Basic Study Material( Solutions for SM1001507)
6- SM1001509 Basic Study Material( Quantitative Ability)
7- SM1001563 Basic Study Material( Solutions for SM1001509)
8- SM1001411 Basic Study Material( Practice Exercises on Quantitative Ability)
9- SM1001407 Basic Study Material( Speed Enhancement Tests)
10- SM1001461 Basic Study Material( Solutions for SM1001401)
DI/DS/LR
11- SM1001402 Basic Study Material(Data Sufficiency)
12- SM1001405 Basic Study Material(Practice Exercises on Data Interpretation)
13- SM1001406 Basic Study Material( Practice Exercises on Reasoning)
14- SM1001417 Basic Study Material(Logical Reasoning for Other Management Entrance Exams)
15- SM1001506 Basic Study Material(Reasoning)
16- SM1001508 Basic Study Material(Logical Reasoning)
ENGLISH
17- SM1001403 Basic Study Material(Reading Comprehension)
18- SM1001414 Basic Study Material( Practice Exercises on Reading comprehension)
19- SM1001404 Basic Study Material(Verbal Ability)
20- SM1001413 Basic Study Material(Practice Exercises on Verbal Ability)
21- V502 Basic Study Material(English Grammar)
22- V102 Basic Study Material(Verbal Ability- Part 2)- English Grammar & Sentence Correction
GD/PI/GA
23- SM1001410 Basic Study Material(General Awareness)
24- SM1001418 Basic Study Material(Group Discussions, And Interviews) Part-2
I wud highly appreciate d same..
I am classroom student of TIME but I no longer want to do MBA, so I want to sell my AIMCAT access at very discounted price.. AimCAT are considered as best test series for CAT. Please contact me if interested.
Guys I have created a group for CAT aspirants from Kolkata. Join the group to discuss all your CAT related queries.https://www.pagalguy.com/discussions/cat-2016-kolkata-aspirants-46151899
MBA Aspirants! Traditional MBA's are losing their value as Hiring Managers look for demonstrable skills over a degree!
Get ready to study smart with an MBA that equips you with the hot skills of Data Science
Read this blog to understand the Industry and career perspective on the difference between a traditional MBA and an MBA in Applied Data Science -
https://www.productleadership.com/traditional-mba-vs-mba-in-applied-data-science/
The link to apply for admission to MBA program, IIT Kanpur (2019-21) is NOW OPEN.
We request you all to fill the form in a timely manner to avoid last minute hassle.
Admission Form Link: https://pingala.iitk.ac.in/MBADM-0/login
Department Information: https://www.iitk.ac.in/ime/
Please route all your queries through our official admission information channels:
Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/371692600265477/
PagalGuy Page: goo.gl/thrG94
Last 2 hours Left to Apply for KJ Somaiya Institute of Management Studies and Research PGDM 2019-2021.
Dont miss on any opportunity, you never know what is written for you.
Deadline Closing soon
Last year cut-offs
CAT- 83 percentile
XAT- 72 percentile
CMAT- 98 percentile
Cut-offs vary every year.
#MasterYourFutureAtSIMSR
#OptimismUnbound
To Know More:
SIMSR Admission Brochure: https://goo.gl/Pz65s5Application
Application Form Link: https://goo.gl/kYJHfi
for queries https://www.pagalguy.com/discussions/official-2019-2021-kj-somaiya-simsr-pgdm-admissions-5315590644826112
Hey! I study in BIMM Pune. It offers the BEST ROI ever, google it! And the campus is amazing! Reach out to me at 9920921514 if ROI is one of your considerations for a B-school. Ill tell you more. Fees - 8 lakh for 2 years Highest package - 14.5 lakh per annum. Good day!
Follow IITB SJMSOM pagalguy page
https://www.pagalguy.com/discussions/official-sjmsom-iit-bombay-admissions-2019-21-6308308779008000
Last date for Application 27th Jan, 2019 . Click on the below link to fill the form
If translated into English, most of the ways economists talk among themselves would sound plausible enough to poets, journalists, businesspeople, and other thoughtful though noneconomical folk. Like serious talk anywhere-among boat designers and baseball fans, say -the talk is hard to follow when one has not made a habit of listening to it for a while. The culture of the conversation makes the words arcane. But the people in the unfamiliar conversation are not Martians. Underneath it all (the economist's favorite phrase) conversational habits are similar. Economics uses mathematical models and statistical tests and market arguments, all of which look alien to the literary eye. But looked at closely they are not so alien. They may be seen as figures of speech- metaphors, analogies, and appeals to authority. Figures of speech are not mere frills. They think for us. Someone who thinks of a market as an “invisible hand” and the organization of work as a “production function” and his coefficients as being “significant,” as an economist does, is giving the language a lot of responsibility. It seems a good idea to look hard at his language. If the economic conversation were found to depend a lot on its verbal forms, this would not mean that economics would be not a science, or just a matter of opinion, or some sort of confidence game. Good poets, though not scientists, are serious thinkers about symbols; good historians, though not scientists, are serious thinkers about data. Good scientists also use language. What is more (though it remains to be shown) they use the cunning of language, without particularly meaning to. The language used is a social object, and using language is a social act. It requires cunning (or, if you prefer, consideration), attention to the other minds present when one speaks. The paying of attention to one's audience is called “rhetoric,” a word that I later exercise hard. One uses rhetoric, of course, to warn of a fire in a theatre or to arouse the xenophobia of the electorate. This sort of yelling is the vulgar meaning of the word, like the president's “heated rhetoric” in a press conference or the “mere rhetoric” to which our enemies stoop. Since the Greek flame was lit, though, the word has been used also in a broader and more amiable sense, to mean the study of all the ways of accomplishing things with language inciting a mob to lynch the accused, to be sure, but also persuading readers of a novel that its characters breathe, or bringing scholars to accept the better argument and reject the worse. The question is whether the scholar- who usually fancies himself an announcer of “results” or a stater of “conclusions” free of rhetoric -speaks rhetorically. Does he try to persuade? It would seem so. Language, I just said, is not a solitary accomplishment. The scholar doesn‟t speak into the void, or to himself. He speaks to a community of voices. He desires to be heeded, praised, published, imitated, honored, en-nobeled. These are the desires. The devices of language are the means. Rhetoric is the proportioning of means to desires in speech. Rhetoric is an economics of language, the study of how scarce means are allocated to the insatiable desires of people to be heard. It seems on the face of it, a reasonable hypothesis that economists are like other people in being talkers, who desire listeners that they go to the library or the laboratory as much as when they go to the office on the polls. The purpose here is to see if this is true, and to see if it is useful to study the rhetoric of economic scholarship. The subject is scholarship. It is not the economy, or the adequacy of economic theory as a description of the economy, or even mainly the economist‟s role in the economy. The subject is the conversation economists have among themselves, for purposes of persuading each other that the interest elasticity of demand for investment is zero or that the money supply is controlled by the Federal Reserve. Unfortunately, though, the conclusions are of more than academic interest. The conversations of classicists or of astronomers rarely affect the lives of other people. Those of economists do so on a large scale. A well known joke describes a May Day parade through Red Square with the usual mass of soldiers, guided missiles, rocket launchers. At last come rank upon rank of people in gray business suits. A bystander asks, “Who are those?” “Aha!” comes the reply, “those are economists: you have no idea what damage they can do!” Their conversations, do it.
21. Based on your understanding of the passage, which of the following conclusions would you agree with:
(1) The geocentric and the heliocentric views of the solar system are equally tenable.
(2) The heliocentric view is superior because of better rhetoric.
(3) Both views use rhetoric to persuade.
(4) Scientists should not use rhetoric.
Hello Guys,
I am IIFT Alumni , we are making a group to provide regular marketing & advertising updates.
For candidates aspiring for MBA in Markeing do join the same.
Join Here:
Hi Team am new to the group I will be giving cat this year 2019 can anyone tell me how I should follow this group as i can see so many groups here which one should i join any lead will be apreciated Thank you