Many people
have raised their voice against transparency of the entire recruitment process of 03/2015 now. I agree that all our hopes were very high because the number of seats was
much higher. However, this does not give anyone a right to question AAI's
credibility. Other PSU's that take online test do not publically disclose the
marks of all candidates.
There are other PSUs that recruit through GATE, eg. IOCL, HPCL, GAIL, ONGC, NTPC, BHEL etc. They usually have two rounds Group Discussion and Personal Interview. Candidates may get rejected on the basis of any of the two rounds. As far as I know, none of the PSUs provide any report card after the interview stating where and when the candidate failed. Same is the case with AAI.
By saying this I am not discouraging anyone from filing RTI to know their marks. People have a right to know their marks but if their marks are low then they should accept that their interview did not impress the interviewer. They should not try to withhold the process by going to court with hypothetical justification of their failure. It will only slow down the entire recruitment process.
If they have good marks they will surely get entry in second round.
Further, please do not the judge this recruitment process on the basis of a 4 year old recruitment process.