Shakuntala Devi - Page 27 - PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA in India and Abroad, CAT 2009, GMAT, XAT, MAT
PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA in India and Abroad, CAT 2009, GMAT, XAT, MAT
Forum Rules
» Sponsors
  PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA in India and Abroad, CAT 2009, GMAT, XAT, MAT > Exam Resources > Quantitative Questions and Answers
Shakuntala Devi
Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe !

Tags: ,

» Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#261)
bindass_rishi bindass_rishi is offline
trying to hit the bull's eye
Trainee PaGaL
 
Posts: 56
Join Date: Sep 2009
Age: 20
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 30
Thanked 17 Times in 9 Posts
Re: Shakuntala Devi - 02-10-2009, 03:25 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by vishalgogia View Post
Hi
How to solve this ques, guys pl give full exlanation not just ans


" clark, jones, mason and smith are 4 people.their professions are druggist, butcher, policeman,and grocer not in the same order as their names.find their respective professions?
1) clark and jones are neighbours and they drive each other to work.
2) jones earns more than mason.

3) Policeman earns more than druggist and grocer.
4) policeman does not have druggist as a neighbour.
5) butcher goes to his work by walk.

6) policeman doesnot meet the grocer until he arrests him for exceeding the speed limit.
7) clark beats smith every time at bowling. ""
Quote:
Originally Posted by bindass_rishi View Post
m also gettin d same ans.......
From the statements v can conclude that Druggist and grocer are neighbours bcoz........acc. to statements policemen and druggist are not neighbours and......also butcher goes to work by walk...so butcher also eliminated from being one of the neighbour........from 6th statement v can also conclude that policemen and grocer cannot b the neighbours................hence druggist and grocer are neighbours.........
nw from 3rd statement v can also conclude that Smith is policemen and mason is butcher......coz policemen earns more than both druggist and grocer.................and according to 2nd statement jones earns more than mason.............nw policemen is smith and butcher is mason......v left with clark and jones...........now according to 6th & 7th statement v can conclude that clark is druggist and jones is grocer as it is given that policemen doesn't know the grocer and clark and smith i.e policemen plays bowling together.Hence v can said that clark is druggist and jones is grocer................
hope it helps!!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
» Quote
The Following User Says NO Thank You to bindass_rishi For This Un-useful Post:
ansh.python (03-11-2009)
The Following User Says Thank You to bindass_rishi For This Useful Post:
vocabchampion (18-11-2009)
Sponsored Links
» Post Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Devi Ahilya Bai, Indore anadi1984 Other Exams - XAT, FMS, JMET, SNAP etc 18 18-06-2008 11:29 AM

» Sponsors

PaGaLGuY.com is not responsible for the views and opinions of the posters.
PaGaLGuY.com is an Inzane Labs Private Limited production.