Quants Teasers - Page 3
PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM
         Home          MBA Forums         PG Office Blog         Contact Us         About Us                  Jobs @ PG
Exclusive Bschool Content:      Interviews      B-School Watch     MBAs speak     Placements     GMAT & MBA Abroad      Form Notifications
» Sponsors






Go Back   PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM > Exam Resources > Quantitative Questions and Answers

Notices
Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe !

Tags: ,

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old
  (#21)
bhars18
has no status.
Hardcore PaGaL
 
bhars18's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 58 Times in 16 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hyderabad
Age: 27
26-03-2003, 10:34 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by bhars18
AD^2 + BD^2 = 2 (OD^2 + OB^2)
That was what I considered different. I know it is derived from Pythagoras theorem, which is the foundation for geometry, after all

Regards,
Bharathi


#include <standard_disclaimer.h>
 Send a message via ICQ to bhars18 Send a message via Yahoo to bhars18 Send a message via AIM to bhars18  
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old
  (#22)
MavericK
Yada Yada Yada
THE-GOD-MOD™
 
MavericK's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,121
Thanks: 122
Thanked 903 Times in 210 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chennai
26-03-2003, 10:38 AM

hello...
can ya give the ppl out here sometime to think...give 1 day time for the answer and then post it...what i see is,b4 i note down the variables,someone has already posted the answer ..so if anyone got the answer, PM the answer to the "Quizmaster"
all the best


Sarchasm - The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient who doesn't get it.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#23)
bhars18
has no status.
Hardcore PaGaL
 
bhars18's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 58 Times in 16 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hyderabad
Age: 27
26-03-2003, 10:45 AM

Oh Anil,

This thread seemed to be an interaction between me and Arcade only . We were so enthu and posted answers and asked questions within no time Guess we should slow down a bit...

By the way, Arcade, I'm weak in series Probably the only series I ever solved was 1,2,3,4,...

Regards,
Bharathi


#include <standard_disclaimer.h>
 Send a message via ICQ to bhars18 Send a message via Yahoo to bhars18 Send a message via AIM to bhars18  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#24)
arcade79
has no status.
Hardcore PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 328
Thanks: 0
Thanked 73 Times in 3 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NewDelhi
26-03-2003, 11:05 AM

Wel strating with Anil, Point noted .. I regret for the rightly said Enthu shown so much.. Thats excellent that the answer shud b posted to quizmaster personally...

BTW frens One day shud b max for a prob and shudnt extend beyond taht...

for bharathi well I wud then say that plz start working on teh series also if u havnt started so far and is also looking for other instis apart from iims...

i wud explain the series answer to u for the time being at PM...


Regards,
Arcade79

A gentle stream can split a mountain, given enough time.
  Send a message via Yahoo to arcade79  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#25)
bhars18
has no status.
Hardcore PaGaL
 
bhars18's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 58 Times in 16 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hyderabad
Age: 27
26-03-2003, 06:54 PM

Given the options I would have selected 8,22 without knowing the reason behind it. Hope you'd explain and enlighten me

Regards,
Bharathi.


#include <standard_disclaimer.h>
 Send a message via ICQ to bhars18 Send a message via Yahoo to bhars18 Send a message via AIM to bhars18  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#26)
arcade79
has no status.
Hardcore PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 328
Thanks: 0
Thanked 73 Times in 3 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NewDelhi
26-03-2003, 07:00 PM

well I think that the time wud b over by the time ppl read this...

well for Bharathi the option had no.s rite but reverse order.. oops close shave..

well the ques series was..7 10 8 13 16 8 19 ...

Ignore 8's for the time being...
7+6=13; 13+6=19
10+6=16;16+6=22

so answer wud b 22, 8 ie A


Regards,
Arcade79

A gentle stream can split a mountain, given enough time.
  Send a message via Yahoo to arcade79  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#27)
arcade79
has no status.
Hardcore PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 328
Thanks: 0
Thanked 73 Times in 3 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NewDelhi
26-03-2003, 07:28 PM

This is what I read once and felt gr8 abt tehse ques

Mathematically speaking, problems like this are impossible. Literally!

That's because there is no restriction on what might come next in a
sequence; ANY list of numbers, chosen for no reason at all, forms a
sequence. So the next number can be anything.

A question like this is really not a math question, but a psychology
question with a bit of math involved. You are not looking for THE
sequence that starts this way, but for the one the asker is MOST
LIKELY to have chosen - the most likely one that has a particularly
simple RULE. And there is no mathematical definition for that.

If you just wanted _a_ sequence that starts this way, but can be
defined by _some_ mathematical rule, there is a technique that lets
you find an answer without guessing. This is called "the method of
finite differences," and you can find it by searching our site (using
the search form at the bottom of most pages) for the phrase. It
assumes (as is always possible) that the sequence you want is defined
by a polynomial, and finds it. Sometimes this is what the problem is
really asking for.

But often, especially when many terms are given, there is a much
simpler rule that is not of polynomial form. Then you are being asked
to use your creativity to find a nice rule. Sometimes starting with
finite differences gives you a good clue, even if you don't end up
with a polynomial; just seeing a pattern in the differences can
reveal something about the sequence. Other times it is helpful to
factor the numbers, or to look at successive ratios. Here you are
doing a more or less orderly search, in order to find something that
may not turn out to be orderly.

Some puzzles like this are really just tricks. The "rule" may be that
the numbers are in alphabetical order, or that each number somehow
"describes" the one before, or even that they are successive digits
of pi. In such cases, you have to ignore all thoughts of rules and
orderly solutions, and just let your mind wander. This is sometimes
called "lateral thinking," and it's entirely incompatible with
"formal methods"!

eg try this which is very similar to one ques posted in XLRI paper

9545864877..

the ques was what are the next 4 digits..


Regards,
Arcade79

A gentle stream can split a mountain, given enough time.
  Send a message via Yahoo to arcade79  
Reply With Quote
quant teasers
Old
  (#28)
anand_12_12
has no status.
Trainee PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 65
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2003
quant teasers - 26-03-2003, 08:58 PM

seriuzly guys no point in takin a doctorate in quant teasers.(unless u r tryin an ala philipptj). there will be more than enuff straight questions in CAT to score a 98 or 99 percentile(in quant) . and by the time u do a quant teaser, however fast u can do it, u can do 2-3 DI questions or corresponding in verbal. and as u saw the weightage for quant is the least for CAT.
so think over it.....
cheerz
anand.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#29)
shub001
has no status.
Addicted PaGaL
 
shub001's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Mumbai
26-03-2003, 10:24 PM

Anand, most probably you are right. But I think we should focus on this kind of strategy later in our preparation. It will only help if we atleast try to crack the teasers.

& Arcade what is the answer??


Drop in at my digital home
  Send a message via Yahoo to shub001 Send a message via MSN to shub001  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#30)
Sathish
has no status.
Newbie PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2003
27-03-2003, 12:59 AM

The next 4 digits for the series “9545864877” could be “5168”


Every set of odd 2 digits seems to be decreasing by a value of 9

95 – 86 = 9
86 – 77 = 9

lly
77 – 9 = 68

Every set of even 2 digits seems to be increasing by a value of 3

45 + 3 = 48

lly
48 + 3 = 51


-Sathish.


You get the best of others when you give the best of yourself
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brain Teasers MavericK Chit-Chat / Your Interests 10 12-08-2005 10:49 AM
Help me with quants !! raingurl Quantitative Questions and Answers 1 27-07-2005 12:19 PM
Clear The Quants Cutoff MANSOOR Quantitative Questions and Answers 58 30-01-2005 12:44 PM
xat quants St.Anger Other Exams - XAT, FMS, JMET, SNAP etc 1 23-12-2003 10:35 PM

» Sponsors










PaGaLGuY.com is not responsible for the views and opinions of the posters.
PaGaLGuY.com is an Inzane Labs Private Limited production.
Hosted on servers powered by Neutral Web