official quant thread for CAT 2009 - Page 701 - PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA in India and Abroad, CAT 2009, GMAT, XAT, MAT
PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA in India and Abroad, CAT 2009, GMAT, XAT, MAT
Forum Rules
» Sponsors
  PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA in India and Abroad, CAT 2009, GMAT, XAT, MAT > Exam Resources > Quantitative Questions and Answers
official quant thread for CAT 2009
Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe !

Tags: , , , ,

» Thread Closed
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#7001)
kinscool kinscool is online now
Be cool,be ignorant
Expert PaGaL
 
kinscool's Avatar
 
Posts: 144
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: B'lore
Age: 23
Groans: 3
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 205
Thanked 37 Times in 25 Posts
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 - 30-06-2009, 10:15 PM

[QUOTE=priyalli;1581618]
Quote:
Originally Posted by kinscool View Post


its given like this only in time package
hey i meant ..my post was wrong...not the question


Click here
http://www.bhookh.com/

No pain, no palm; no thorns, no throne; no gall, no glory; no cross, no crown

Rgds,
Kiran
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
Sponsored Links
  (#7002)
Ankurb Ankurb is offline
has no status.
Addicted PaGaL
 
Posts: 1,149
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Bangalore
Groans: 0
Groaned at 7 Times in 7 Posts
Thanks: 80
Thanked 639 Times in 417 Posts
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 - 30-06-2009, 10:16 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by justtj View Post
they would each be at integral value at follow time as there can be only 5 integral divisions between 11 and 12...

11:12, 11:24,11:36,11:48

correct me if i am wrong...
you got it all correct, may be the question is not properly constructed but that's the answer.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
  (#7003)
justtj justtj is offline
Ye status msg MICA ke hostel mai baith kar hi change karoonga :)
Hardcore PaGaL
PG MADCAPZ

 
justtj's Avatar
 
Posts: 311
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: delhi
Groans: 16
Groaned at 5 Times in 5 Posts
Thanks: 557
Thanked 1,010 Times in 188 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to justtj
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 - 30-06-2009, 10:22 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by priyalli View Post
A number is divided into five parts .Twice the first part,thrice the second part and four times the fourth part are equal .Twice the second part ,five time the rhird part and six time sthe last part are equal .which of the following is always true if all the parts are integers ????
a)The first part is a multiple of 72
b)The second part is divisible by the forth part
c)the product of the first and fourth parts is divisible by 30
d)the first part is a factor of the last part

pls give the explanation also......
let 5 parts be a,b,c,d,e

from 1st statement, 2a = 3b = 4d
from 2nd statement, 2b = 5c = 6e

hence we can say 4a = 6b = 15c = 8d = 18e

dividing by 720,
we can say numbers r in ratio

90:60:24:45:20

a)The first part is a multiple of 72
false
b)The second part is divisible by the forth part
false
c)the product of the first and fourth parts is divisible by 30
true
d)the first part is a factor of the last part
false


..SBT '09..
A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way.
My Photography Work | Me @ Facebook | SBT 09 | PG Meets @ Delhi
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to justtj For This Useful Post:
priyalli (30-06-2009)
  (#7004)
prateek7563 prateek7563 is offline
has no status.
Hardcore PaGaL
 
Posts: 602
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: delhi
Age: 20
Groans: 0
Groaned at 13 Times in 10 Posts
Thanks: 23
Thanked 56 Times in 42 Posts
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 - 30-06-2009, 10:23 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by justtj View Post
huh?
m i missing something?

-> sides r 1, 2 , root 3

Angles will be 180/(3 + root 3), (2*180)/(3 + root 3), (root3*180)/(3 + root 3)
comes out to be 38, 76 and 66

and 38 + 76 + 66 = 180
i didi by the "Solution of Triangles" .I cant understand ur approach
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
  (#7005)
priyalli priyalli is offline
hiii
Trainee PaGaL
 
Posts: 66
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: bhopal
Groans: 2
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 38
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 - 30-06-2009, 10:24 PM

A number is divided into five parts ,Twice the first part,thrice the second part and four times the fourth part are equal .Twice the second part ,five times the third part and six times the last part are equal .Which of the following is always true if all the parts are integers ??????
1-the first part is a multiple of 72
2--the second part is divisible by the fourth part
3--the first part is the factor of the last part
4-- the product of the first and the fourth parts is divisible by 30

plss elaborate by steps
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
  (#7006)
justtj justtj is offline
Ye status msg MICA ke hostel mai baith kar hi change karoonga :)
Hardcore PaGaL
PG MADCAPZ

 
justtj's Avatar
 
Posts: 311
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: delhi
Groans: 16
Groaned at 5 Times in 5 Posts
Thanks: 557
Thanked 1,010 Times in 188 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to justtj
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 - 30-06-2009, 10:24 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ankurb View Post
you got it all correct, may be the question is not properly constructed but that's the answer.
the question is correct...
maybe we can expect this type of language in CAT...

question asks

between 11 to 12, how many times will both {minute and hour} hands of clock will be at an integral values.

it does not say whether they will intersect or overlap.


..SBT '09..
A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way.
My Photography Work | Me @ Facebook | SBT 09 | PG Meets @ Delhi
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
  (#7007)
justtj justtj is offline
Ye status msg MICA ke hostel mai baith kar hi change karoonga :)
Hardcore PaGaL
PG MADCAPZ

 
justtj's Avatar
 
Posts: 311
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: delhi
Groans: 16
Groaned at 5 Times in 5 Posts
Thanks: 557
Thanked 1,010 Times in 188 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to justtj
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 - 30-06-2009, 10:28 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by prateek7563 View Post
i didi by the "Solution of Triangles" .I cant understand ur approach
my approach is simple, based on ratio..

the bigger the side, larger will be the opposite angle, right?

so the angles will be in same ratio as the opposite side.

(period.) question ends here...


further to find angles...
r3 = root3, short form

angles r in ratio 1 : 2 : r3

so we can say
1*x + 2*x + r3*x = 180
x*(3 + r3) = 180
x = 180 / (3 + r3)

x comes out to be 38

hence we get the angles...

wots ur approach?
howcome u got side opposite to root3 = 60? and other one as 120?


..SBT '09..
A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way.
My Photography Work | Me @ Facebook | SBT 09 | PG Meets @ Delhi
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
  (#7008)
chandan.mnnit chandan.mnnit is offline
is Keeping his Finger's Crossed
Expert PaGaL
 
Posts: 110
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: bangalore
Age: 25
Groans: 3
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 96
Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 - 30-06-2009, 10:29 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ankurb View Post
you got it all correct, may be the question is not properly constructed but that's the answer.
11:12, 11:24,11:36,11:48

Ankurb these answers does not satisfy the question that has been asked

becoz the angle of the hor hand at 48 min would be 24 degree(from 11 o clock position) or 354 degree from the 12 o clock position

and minute hand would be at 48*6 degree that is 288 degree from 12 o clock position.

and the rest of the answers 11:12, 11:24,11:36 ...on looking at them you can just tell that these are not correct....

I think the answer should be 0....

Ur thought!!!!


On second thought after reading the post by justtj the answers make sense


Opportunity knocked at my door!!My doorman threw him out

CAT 08' : Q = 95%ile,DI = 59%ile,VA = 99.46%ile . OA = 98%ile

Last edited by chandan.mnnit; 30-06-2009 at 10:34 PM. Reason: Added comment
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
  (#7009)
justtj justtj is offline
Ye status msg MICA ke hostel mai baith kar hi change karoonga :)
Hardcore PaGaL
PG MADCAPZ

 
justtj's Avatar
 
Posts: 311
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: delhi
Groans: 16
Groaned at 5 Times in 5 Posts
Thanks: 557
Thanked 1,010 Times in 188 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to justtj
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 - 30-06-2009, 10:31 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by priyalli View Post
A number is divided into five parts ,Twice the first part,thrice the second part and four times the fourth part are equal .Twice the second part ,five times the third part and six times the last part are equal .Which of the following is always true if all the parts are integers ??????
1-the first part is a multiple of 72
2--the second part is divisible by the fourth part
3--the first part is the factor of the last part
4-- the product of the first and the fourth parts is divisible by 30

plss elaborate by steps
really really elaborate version


let 5 parts be a,b,c,d,e

from 1st statement, 2a = 3b = 4d
from 2nd statement, 2b = 5c = 6e

hence we can say 4a = 6b = 15c = 8d = 18e

dividing by 720,
we can say numbers r in ratio

90:60:24:45:20

a)The first part is a multiple of 72
first part is 90, and is not a multiple of 90
hence false


b)The second part is divisible by the forth part
second part = 60, is not divisible by 4th part = 45
hence false

c)the product of the first and fourth parts is divisible by 30
product of 1st and 3rd = 90 * 24
it is divisible by 30
hence true

d)the first part is a factor of the last part
first is 90 and it is not a factor of 20
hence false


if you still cant understand.
pm me.


..SBT '09..
A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way.
My Photography Work | Me @ Facebook | SBT 09 | PG Meets @ Delhi
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to justtj For This Useful Post:
priyalli (30-06-2009)
  (#7010)
priyalli priyalli is offline
hiii
Trainee PaGaL
 
Posts: 66
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: bhopal
Groans: 2
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 38
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 - 30-06-2009, 10:34 PM

Thre friends Aarvind ,Bharat and chandu are about to have their breakfast aravind has 7 apples ,bharat has 5 apples and chandu has no apples but has 12 coines .he offers to pay for some apples .they agree to share the 12 aaples equally among themselves and agree that chandu would pay 12 coins for his share .Bharat suggests that he be paid 5 coins and Aravind be paid 7coins .Aravind says that he should get more than 7 coins .how much should ararvind get ???????


steps ........
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
» Thread Closed

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
XLRI 2009 -Official thread for Queries sumitrocks Other Exams - XAT, FMS, JMET, SNAP etc 1534 13-08-2009 01:24 PM
official quant thread for cat08 convivial Quantitative Questions and Answers 14980 19-01-2009 04:30 PM
(UN)Official UK MBA thread santosh International and Indian MBA schools accepting GMAT 45 23-12-2008 11:07 AM
The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread Krack_CAT Quantitative Questions and Answers 5170 07-02-2008 01:42 PM
The Official Good Luck Thread!!!! flyingkolours Chit-Chat / Your Interests 212 16-05-2004 12:29 AM

» Sponsors

PaGaLGuY.com is not responsible for the views and opinions of the posters.
PaGaLGuY.com is an Inzane Labs Private Limited production.