| | | | |
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 140 Thanks: 122
Thanked 56 Times in 26 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Chennai | Re: CAT 2008: Quantitative Questions a Day 1 to 50 - The discussions -
19-05-2008, 08:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by srikar2097 I didn't get two things in your approach -
1) How did you declare that p,q,r,s is an increasing GP? ---it is given that ps=qr => p/q=r/s (common ratio... since the ratios are equal therefore we can tell that it is a GP ... now as p<q<r<s... there fore it is an incresing GP)
2) Initially, you had a^1/2(r^3/2 - 1). What happened to 'a^1/2' We have a^1/2(r^3/2 - 1)<1
for this to hold true at least one quantity should be less than 1... a^1/2 cant be less than 1(a is a positive integer... square root of all postive integers are greater than 1 thus (r^3/2 - 1) should be less than 1 ) | Pls find my comment embedded above | | | | | | | |
has no suttas
Addicted PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 968 Thanks: 123
Thanked 435 Times in 243 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Bangalore | Re: CAT 2008: Quantitative Questions a Day 1 to 50 - The discussions -
19-05-2008, 08:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sabsebadapaagal Pls find my comment embedded above |
I see what you are saying...
But the inequality given is q less than or equal to r. How does this fit into your picture of increasing GP? | | | | | The Following User Says Thank You to srikar2097 For This Useful Post: | | | | | |
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 140 Thanks: 122
Thanked 56 Times in 26 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Chennai | Re: CAT 2008: Quantitative Questions a Day 1 to 50 - The discussions -
19-05-2008, 08:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by srikar2097 I see what you are saying...
But the inequality given is q less than or equal to r. How does this fit into your picture of increasing GP? | I guess this is the mistake ... I didnt see equal to anyways thanks alot | | | | | | | |
has no status.
Trainee PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 33 Thanks: 21
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
Join Date: May 2008 Location: jammu Age: 23 | Re: CAT 2008: Quantitative Questions a Day 1 to 50 - The discussions -
19-05-2008, 08:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarav
Here is the official solution to 001 - we might change this if by end of the day someone comes with a better approach Solution: Given a(a+1) + b(b+1) + c(c+1) + d(d+1) = 312 => (a-1)^2 + (b-1)^2 + (c-1)^2 + (d-1)^2 = 312 - 3S + 4 = 256. Let a-1 = A, b-1 = B, c-1 = C, d-1 = D => we have non-negative integers A, B, C, D such that A^2 + B^2 + C^2 + D^2 = (A+B+C+D)^2 (the LHS <= RHS always) and can only be true if all but one number is zero => three among a, b, c, d are 1 and fourth number is 17. Thus (3) holds true - (2) can guarantee the values for c and d. For a=b we have exactly 2 determinable values - thus (1) is not true. => choice (5) is the right answer |
HEY am new and following the thread only now... if its not a problem can someone explain the line i highlighted!! | | | | | | | |
is battling for life
Hardcore PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 419 Thanks: 589
Thanked 333 Times in 155 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Bangalore | Re: CAT 2008: Quantitative Questions a Day 1 to 50 - The discussions -
19-05-2008, 10:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sabsebadapaagal It will be clear that p,q,r,s form an increasing GP.
Let a be the starting term of this GP and r be the common ratio.. now the terms come out to be a,ar,ar^2,ar^3
Now plugging these values in √s - √p <=1 √ar^3 - √a <=1
=> a^1/2(r^3/2 - 1) <=1
r^3/2 -1 <= 1
r^3/2 <=2
r<= 4^1/3
Now, applying this to both the conditions(X and Y) above we are not able to find the value of p
thus option 5 | How did you decide on a GP? p/q = r/s, we do not know the value of q/r.
----------
slam. | | | | | | | |
is Bak
Certified PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 2,227 Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 2,146 Times in 851 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Kanpur | Re: CAT 2008: Quantitative Questions a Day 1 to 50 - The discussions -
19-05-2008, 10:27 AM
@srikar why haven't you considered p=2,3 and other integers which are not perfect squares?? | | | | | | | |
has no suttas
Addicted PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 968 Thanks: 123
Thanked 435 Times in 243 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Bangalore | Re: CAT 2008: Quantitative Questions a Day 1 to 50 - The discussions -
19-05-2008, 10:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by implex @srikar why haven't you considered p=2,3 and other integers which are not perfect squares?? |
Because it's stated that s,p are positive integers and also that s^1/2 - p^1/2 =< 1. Which seems to be satisfied if s,p are perfect squares.
Although I must confess I don't understand the reason for " | | | | | | | |
Is calm
Expert PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 218 Thanks: 190
Thanked 206 Times in 77 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Pune Age: 23 | Re: CAT 2008: Quantitative Questions a Day 1 to 50 - The discussions -
19-05-2008, 10:34 AM
The question is followed by two statements X and Y. Answer each question using the following instruction:Choose 1 if the question can be answered by X onlyChoose 2 if the question can be answered by Y onlyChoose 3 if the question can be answered by either X or Y Choose 4 if the question can be answered by both X and YChoose 5 if the question can be answered by neither X nor Y The positive integers are such that p < q = r < s < 100, ps = qr and vs - vp <= 1. What is the value of p? (X) The last digit of s is either 1, 2 or 3 (Y) 50 < p and r < 90 Well, if we consider the first statement, i.e. X) The last digit of s is either 1, 2 or 3 the possible numbers would be 93,92,91 83, 82, 81 73, 72, 71 63,62, 61 53,52,51, 43,42,41 so on... But it is given that Sqrt s - Sqrt p <= 1, then for S only choice left is 81 !! and in this case P would be 64, 49, 36, 25,16.. But if we consider the second condition, i.e. Y) 50 < p and r < 90 then only chioce for P is 64 ! So Sqrt 81 - Sqrt64 = -1 (It satisfies the condition) Now P*S = 5184, from this we can find r & q, we consider r=q, then only 72 satisfies the condition. So Answer could be found out from two statesment together. Even thoguht you cant only assume r=q and if you dont find r & s still you will get the value of P as 64 from both statements. Hence answer is Option 4 Correct me if i am wrong !! | | | | | | | |
is Bak
Certified PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 2,227 Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 2,146 Times in 851 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Kanpur | Re: CAT 2008: Quantitative Questions a Day 1 to 50 - The discussions -
19-05-2008, 10:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by srikar2097 Because it's stated that s,p are positive integers and also that s^1/2 - p^1/2 =< 1. Which seems to be satisfied if s,p are perfect squares.
Although I must confess I don't understand the reason for " | what ? I can't understand how are people assuming perfect squares?
sqrt(3)-sqrt(2)<=1
but neither oof them are perfect squares..
we can't assume perfect squares !! | | | | | The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to implex For This Useful Post: | | | | | |
Persevering to be the best
Student
Status: Offline Posts: 4,385 Thanks: 966
Thanked 4,438 Times in 1,322 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Kingdom of Heaven | Re: CAT 2008: Quantitative Questions a Day 1 to 50 - The discussions -
19-05-2008, 10:42 AM
I was fearing putting as DS problem as last year we couldn't construct these with aplomb and people ended up getting the answers in 2 minutes. With 3 different answers already, I think I have done a fair job this time around What lies in front of you or behind you is nothing compared to what lies within you - T.M.W.S.H.F The greatest events in the life aren't the loudest, but the quietest hours - Anonymous Subscribe to QQAD: http://www.pagalguy.com/index.php?categoryid=65 | | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |
| |