THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - Page 59
PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM
         Home          MBA Forums         PG Office Blog         Contact Us         About Us                  Jobs @ PG
Exclusive Bschool Content:      Interviews      B-School Watch     MBAs speak     Placements     GMAT & MBA Abroad      Form Notifications
» Sponsors






Go Back   PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM > Exam Resources > Quantitative Questions and Answers

Notices
Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe !

Tags: , , ,

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#581)
rahulmehranu
got moi simcat rank
Trainee PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 57
Thanks: 120
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ahemedabad
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 29-07-2008, 11:42 PM

a gud question

Q. a party is held at the house of the mehtas. there are 5 other couples present(besides mr & mrs mehta), and many,but not all, pairs of people shook hands. nobody shook hands with anyone twice, and nobody shook hands with his or her spouse. both the host and hostess shook some hands.
at the end of the party, mr mehta poll each person present to see how many hands each person(other than himself) shook. each person gives a different answer.
determine how many hands mrs mehta must have shaken.

i will give the answer tomorrow.
solve it
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#582)
rahulmehranu
got moi simcat rank
Trainee PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 57
Thanks: 120
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ahemedabad
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 31-07-2008, 12:34 AM

anyways answer to this question is 5
a solved q for arun shrma di/lr book
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#583)
srikar2097
has no suttas
Addicted PaGaL
 
srikar2097's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 968
Thanks: 123
Thanked 435 Times in 243 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bangalore
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 31-07-2008, 07:12 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by srikar2097 View Post
New Problem!

I'm trying to find some good DI problem to post here. But until that time comes you guys have a crack at this LR problem

There are 10 statements written on a piece of paper:

1. At least one of statements 9 and 10 is true.
2. This either is the first true or the first false statement.
3. There are three consecutive statements, which are false.
4. The difference between the numbers of the last true and the first true statement
divides the number, that is to be found.
5. The sum of the numbers of the true statements is the number, that is to be found.
6. This is not the last true statement.
7. The number of each true statement divides the number, that is to be found.
8. The number that is to be found is the percentage of true statements.
9. The number of divisors of the number, that is to be found, (apart from 1 and itself)
is greater than the sum of the numbers of the true statements.
10. There are no three consecutive true statements.

Find the minimal possible number?
No one tried this question Was it too hard or …?

Anyway the Answer:

The numebr is 420.
If statement 6 is false, it creates a paradox. Hence, Statement 6 must be true.
Consider Statement 2:
* If it is true, it must be the first true statement. Otherwise, it creates a paradox.
* If it is false, it must be the second false statement. Otherwise, it creates a
paradox.
In both the cases, Statement 1 is false.
As Statement 1 is false, Statement 9 and Statement 10 both are false i.e. there are three
consecutive true statements.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
False - - - - True - - False False
Let\'s assume that Statement 3 is false i.e. there are no three consecutive false
statements. It means that Statement 2 and Statement 8 must be true, else there will be
three consecutive false statements.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
False True False - - True - True False False
Also, atleast two of Statements 4, 5 and 7 must be true as there are three consecutive true
statements.
According to Statement 8, the number that is to be found is the percentage of true
statements. Hence, number is either 50 or 60. Now if Statement 7 is true, then the number
of each true statement divides the number, that is to be found. But 7 and 8 do not divide
either 50 or 60. Hence, Statement 7 is false which means that Statement 4 and 5 are true.
But Statement 5 contradicts the Statement 8. Hence, our assumption that Statement 3 is
false is wrong and Statement 3 is true i.e. there are 3 consecutive false statements which
means that Statement 8 is false as there is no other possibilities of 3 consecutive false
statements.
Also, Statement 7 is true as Statement 6 is not the last true statement.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
False - True - - True True False False False
According to Statement 7, the number of each true statement divides the number, that is to
be found. And according to Statement 5, the sum of the numbers of the true statements is
the number, that is to be found. For all possible combinations Statement 5 is false.
There 3 consecutive true statements. Hence, Statement 2 and Statement 4 are true.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
False True True True False True True False False False
Now, the conditions for the number to be found are:
1. The numebr is divisible by 5 (Statement 4)
2. The numebr is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 (Statement 7)
3. The number of divisors of the number, that is to be found, (apart from 1 and itself)
is not greater than the sum of the numbers of the true statements. (Statement 9)
The minimum possible number is 420.
The divisors of 420, apart from 1 and itself are 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 12, 14, 15, 20, 21,
28, 30, 35, 42, 60, 70, 84, 105, 140, 210. There are total of 22 divisors. Also, the sum of
the numbers of the true statements is 22 (2+3+4+6+7=22), which satisfies the third
condition.
   
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to srikar2097 For This Useful Post:
rahulmehranu (01-08-2008), roshi (04-08-2008)
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#584)
rahulmehranu
got moi simcat rank
Trainee PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 57
Thanks: 120
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ahemedabad
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 01-08-2008, 02:43 AM

can we discuss it again


a gud question

Q. a party is held at the house of the mehtas. there are 5 other couples present(besides mr & mrs mehta), and many,but not all, pairs of people shook hands. nobody shook hands with anyone twice, and nobody shook hands with his or her spouse. both the host and hostess shook some hands.
at the end of the party, mr mehta poll each person present to see how many hands each person(other than himself) shook. each person gives a different answer.
determine how many hands mrs mehta must have shaken.

i will give the answer tomorrow.
solve it
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#585)
rahulmehranu
got moi simcat rank
Trainee PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 57
Thanks: 120
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ahemedabad
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 01-08-2008, 03:12 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by srikar2097 View Post
No one tried this question Was it too hard or …?

Anyway the Answer:

The numebr is 420.
If statement 6 is false, it creates a paradox. Hence, Statement 6 must be true.
Consider Statement 2:
* If it is true, it must be the first true statement. Otherwise, it creates a paradox.
* If it is false, it must be the second false statement. Otherwise, it creates a
paradox.
In both the cases, Statement 1 is false.
As Statement 1 is false, Statement 9 and Statement 10 both are false i.e. there are three
consecutive true statements.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
False - - - - True - - False False
Let\'s assume that Statement 3 is false i.e. there are no three consecutive false
statements. It means that Statement 2 and Statement 8 must be true, else there will be
three consecutive false statements.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
False True False - - True - True False False
Also, atleast two of Statements 4, 5 and 7 must be true as there are three consecutive true
statements.
According to Statement 8, the number that is to be found is the percentage of true
statements. Hence, number is either 50 or 60. Now if Statement 7 is true, then the number
of each true statement divides the number, that is to be found. But 7 and 8 do not divide
either 50 or 60. Hence, Statement 7 is false which means that Statement 4 and 5 are true.
But Statement 5 contradicts the Statement 8. Hence, our assumption that Statement 3 is
false is wrong and Statement 3 is true i.e. there are 3 consecutive false statements which
means that Statement 8 is false as there is no other possibilities of 3 consecutive false
statements.
Also, Statement 7 is true as Statement 6 is not the last true statement.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
False - True - - True True False False False
According to Statement 7, the number of each true statement divides the number, that is to
be found. And according to Statement 5, the sum of the numbers of the true statements is
the number, that is to be found. For all possible combinations Statement 5 is false.
There 3 consecutive true statements. Hence, Statement 2 and Statement 4 are true.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
False True True True False True True False False False
Now, the conditions for the number to be found are:
1. The numebr is divisible by 5 (Statement 4)
2. The numebr is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 (Statement 7)
3. The number of divisors of the number, that is to be found, (apart from 1 and itself)
is not greater than the sum of the numbers of the true statements. (Statement 9)
The minimum possible number is 420.
The divisors of 420, apart from 1 and itself are 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 12, 14, 15, 20, 21,
28, 30, 35, 42, 60, 70, 84, 105, 140, 210. There are total of 22 divisors. Also, the sum of
the numbers of the true statements is 22 (2+3+4+6+7=22), which satisfies the third
condition.


my ans is also 420
i hav solved it without looking at ur soln.
now solve my question
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#586)
rahulmehranu
got moi simcat rank
Trainee PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 57
Thanks: 120
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ahemedabad
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 01-08-2008, 03:13 AM




Q. a party is held at the house of the mehtas. there are 5 other couples present(besides mr & mrs mehta), and many,but not all, pairs of people shook hands. nobody shook hands with anyone twice, and nobody shook hands with his or her spouse. both the host and hostess shook some hands.
at the end of the party, mr mehta poll each person present to see how many hands each person(other than himself) shook. each person gives a different answer.
determine how many hands mrs mehta must have shaken.

i will give the answer tomorrow.
solve it
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#587)
nikunj14_83
has no status.
Trainee PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 92
Thanks: 13
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: lucknow..currently in bangalore
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 01-08-2008, 09:41 AM

Hi ppl,
I am really stuck with this DI ques..help me out in solving this plz....
Attached Files
File Type: doc DI ques.doc (41.0 KB, 74 views)
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASONING
Old
  (#588)
BumBumBhole
need tips to remain focused....
Newbie PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Hyderabad
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASONING - 01-08-2008, 11:09 PM

can you explain in detail how to solve such problems
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASONING
Old
  (#589)
srikar2097
has no suttas
Addicted PaGaL
 
srikar2097's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 968
Thanks: 123
Thanked 435 Times in 243 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bangalore
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASONING - 01-08-2008, 11:56 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BumBumBhole View Post
can you explain in detail how to solve such problems
What problems are you talking about? Please post the problem…
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASONING
Old
  (#590)
kewl.bantee
now or never
Hardcore PaGaL
 
kewl.bantee's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 453
Thanks: 77
Thanked 283 Times in 138 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: bhubaneswar
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASONING - 04-08-2008, 04:40 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BumBumBhole View Post
can you explain in detail how to solve such problems
u mean DI-LR probs?


lyfe bcomes wot we make of it, and wot we make of lyfe dpends entirely on how we manage d ideas tht come to our brain

and its all total different if one doesnt hav a brain
  Send a message via Yahoo to kewl.bantee  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

» Sponsors










PaGaLGuY.com is not responsible for the views and opinions of the posters.
PaGaLGuY.com is an Inzane Labs Private Limited production.
Hosted on servers powered by Neutral Web