THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - Page 53
PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM
         Home          MBA Forums         PG Office Blog         Contact Us         About Us                  Jobs @ PG
Exclusive Bschool Content:      Interviews      B-School Watch     MBAs speak     Placements     GMAT & MBA Abroad      Form Notifications
» Sponsors






Go Back   PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM > Exam Resources > Quantitative Questions and Answers

Notices
Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe !

Tags: , , ,

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#521)
saumyakumar123
has no status.
Newbie PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 10
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: delhi
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 11-07-2008, 09:59 AM

Just Wanted to Know why is everyone keeping so quiet?
sorry forgot to introduce myself. I am Saumya from bangalore i ll be taking CAT for the Last time this year. So looking forward to learn a lot from you guys.
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#522)
made_for_iims
is miffed off by ppl with double standards
Hardcore PaGaL
 
made_for_iims's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 665
Groans: 133
Groaned at 17 Times in 15 Posts
Thanks: 1,479
Thanked 1,343 Times in 292 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lost in the wind.......
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 11-07-2008, 10:54 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by marijuana_user View Post
Hi!

Some DS questions::

1. 8 teams participated in IPL. Every team played exactly two matches against every other team. No match ended in a draw. A team got 1 point for a win and no point for a loss. If no 2 teams had the same points, what was the rank of Rajasthan Royals (RR)

A-> RR won more den 60% and less than 70% matches it played.
B-> No 2 of the bottom three teams had points as consecutive numbers.

2. There are 101 teams participating in a tournament. Each team playes with any other team at most once. THe number of matches played by nth team,Tn is n (n<=99). How many matches were played by T101.

A-> T100 played 100 matches
B-> T50 played a game with T51.


Regards!
First Question

A. We can reframe it like...RR won 9 matches
==> We cant determine from this
since the possible values could be
13,12,10,9,6,4,2,0 (here first team won all matches except one match from RR)...
and rest all won all matches frm the successive teams.
14,12,9,8,7,4,2,0 (here RR lost against fifth team...rest all won all matches frm successive teams)

B.
==> We cant determine anything frm this...as it is we have two above cases which doesnt have No consecutive numbers in bottom three...

A&B
=> combining the two...still we have atleast these two above cases

Cant be determined


A promise that i couldnt keep....
   
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to made_for_iims For This Useful Post:
marijuana_user (11-07-2008), monsterkartik (11-07-2008)
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#523)
made_for_iims
is miffed off by ppl with double standards
Hardcore PaGaL
 
made_for_iims's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 665
Groans: 133
Groaned at 17 Times in 15 Posts
Thanks: 1,479
Thanked 1,343 Times in 292 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lost in the wind.......
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 11-07-2008, 11:08 AM

Question 2:

Given...
T1=1 ,T2=2 , T3=3....T99=99

A.
Now we know that T100 played 100 matches....
=>T100 played with every other team
So if we remove T100 frm the pic....
we'll have
T1=0 T2=1 T3=2 T4 =3 T99=98
Now considering T99.... it can play with atmost 98 teams(removing T1,T100 and itself)...and it had played 98 matches...so it played with everyone rest...including T101....

now removing T99 too
T1=0 T2=0 T3=1 T4=2..... T98=96
Now T98 can play atmost with 96 teams (T0,T1,T99,T100 and itself).....

So it'll play with T101 too.... this ways we can def calc how many matches T101 played.... its 50 matches.... but since its DS we need not calculate it....


B.
Here if we assume that Tn played all the matches with T(100-n)....T(n-1) (Upto 99) + with T100.... we can have T101 playing Zero matches and T100 as 99....

And also we can have option above too.... SO we cant determine answer with B alone


A promise that i couldnt keep....

Last edited by made_for_iims; 11-07-2008 at 11:11 AM.. Reason: spelling mistakes
   
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to made_for_iims For This Useful Post:
marijuana_user (11-07-2008), monsterkartik (11-07-2008)
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#524)
aky_akshay
has no status.
Trainee PaGaL
 
aky_akshay's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 45
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jamnagar
Age: 25
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 12-07-2008, 10:24 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by marijuana_user View Post
Hi!

Some DS questions::

1. 8 teams participated in IPL. Every team played exactly two matches against every other team. No match ended in a draw. A team got 1 point for a win and no point for a loss. If no 2 teams had the same points, what was the rank of Rajasthan Royals (RR)

A-> RR won more den 60% and less than 70% matches it played.
B-> No 2 of the bottom three teams had points as consecutive numbers.

2. There are 101 teams participating in a tournament. Each team playes with any other team at most once. THe number of matches played by nth team,Tn is n (n<=99). How many matches were played by T101.

A-> T100 played 100 matches
B-> T50 played a game with T51.


Regards!
  1. I think both A & B together are not sufficient.
  2. Staement A alone is sufficient.
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#525)
Arshis
has no status.
Newbie PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: delhi
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 12-07-2008, 11:07 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by naresh007 View Post
Here's my First Puzzle:
call it Great Einstein's Riddle:

He said that 98% of the world could not solve it. But several NIEHS scientists were able to solve it, and they said it's not all that hard if you pay attention and are very patient. Give it a try:
There are 5 houses in 5 different colors in a row. In each house lives a person with a different nationality. The 5 owners drink a certain type of beverage, smoke a certain brand of cigar, and keep a certain pet. No owners have the same pet, smoke the same brand of cigar, or drink the same beverage. Other facts:
1. The Brit lives in the red house.
2. The Swede keeps dogs as pets.
3. The Dane drinks tea.
4. The green house is on the immediate left of the white house.
5. The green house's owner drinks coffee.
6. The owner who smokes Pall Mall rears birds.
7. The owner of the yellow house smokes Dunhill.
8. The owner living in the center house drinks milk.
9. The Norwegian lives in the first house.
10. The owner who smokes Blends lives next to the one who keeps cats.
11. The owner who keeps the horse lives next to the one who smokes Dunhill.
12. The owner who smokes Blue masters drinks beer.
13. The German smokes Prince.
14. The Norwegian lives next to the blue house.
15. The owner who smokes Blends lives next to the one who drinks water.

The question is: WHO OWNS THE FISH?


Hey the answer is GERMAN..........
I got the answer thru d method of compilin the problem by a table.......... but it consumed a lot of time arnd 12-15 mins.... is there a faster method to reach to d result....
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#526)
marijuana_user
Beer Leader and Founder BB'B'T 08
Hardcore PaGaL
 
marijuana_user's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 603
Groans: 33
Groaned at 28 Times in 15 Posts
Thanks: 1,273
Thanked 1,258 Times in 336 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Delhi
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 12-07-2008, 04:01 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by made_for_iims View Post
First Question

A. We can reframe it like...RR won 9 matches
==> We cant determine from this
since the possible values could be
13,12,10,9,6,4,2,0 (here first team won all matches except one match from RR)...
and rest all won all matches frm the successive teams.
14,12,9,8,7,4,2,0 (here RR lost against fifth team...rest all won all matches frm successive teams)

B.
==> We cant determine anything frm this...as it is we have two above cases which doesnt have No consecutive numbers in bottom three...

A&B
=> combining the two...still we have atleast these two above cases

Cant be determined
Hey Harsh,

EVen i did it the same way. BUt here is what the official key says ::

Total No of matches :: 56..(8C2)*2

--> The total number of points of all the teams taken together = 56. From A the total number of points of A is 9 but nothing can be said abt its rank. From B the total points of RR are unknown.

COmbining both::

RR can't have rank 1 or rank below 4 as then in that case the total no. of points won't be 56.

If there are 5 rank below RR then points can be 12,10,9,8,7,6,3,1.

If there are 4 teams below RR , the min. points above wud be 10,11,12 but the teams below RR cannot have points satisfying B statement.

Hence ans C.

Regards!
Marijuana!


Member NCT DT '08'!!

Beerleader!!!!!

BB'B'T 08!!!!!
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#527)
made_for_iims
is miffed off by ppl with double standards
Hardcore PaGaL
 
made_for_iims's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 665
Groans: 133
Groaned at 17 Times in 15 Posts
Thanks: 1,479
Thanked 1,343 Times in 292 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lost in the wind.......
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 13-07-2008, 12:09 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by marijuana_user View Post
Hey Harsh,

EVen i did it the same way. BUt here is what the official key says ::

Total No of matches :: 56..(8C2)*2

--> The total number of points of all the teams taken together = 56. From A the total number of points of A is 9 but nothing can be said abt its rank. From B the total points of RR are unknown.

COmbining both::

RR can't have rank 1 or rank below 4 as then in that case the total no. of points won't be 56.

If there are 5 rank below RR then points can be 12,10,9,8,7,6,3,1.

If there are 4 teams below RR , the min. points above wud be 10,11,12 but the teams below RR cannot have points satisfying B statement.

Hence ans C.

Regards!
Marijuana!
hmmm since above two cases are 100% possible(I literally tallied their points now ).... Answer can never be C....may be they are missing something...or they forgot to mention some extra fact too...


A promise that i couldnt keep....
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#528)
bangaram
Yes, I can
Trainee PaGaL
 
bangaram's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 80
Groans: 1
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 131
Thanked 40 Times in 15 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hyderabad
Age: 23
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 15-07-2008, 01:22 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by shivam_01 View Post
410 students of 5 different colleges have registered in TathaGat for a classroom program. These colleges are NSIT, IIT, Jamia, JSS and North Campus (DU). TathaGat team has divided the city in a grid network as shown in the figure below. The grid network follows the co–ordinate rule to identify the points on it. One can travel along this grid only. The five colleges are shown by dots ( .</span>)</span> and the number written in bracket below a college’s name represent the number of students from the respective college.


67. If TathaGat team decides to open only one center, find out the co-ordinate of this only center such that the sum of the total distance traveled by all the students is minimum.
(0, 4) (8, 7) (6, 15) (6, 4) none of these
68. After six months team proposed to start another center without shifting the first center of the above problem. Find out the co-ordinate of the second center assuming that this proposal is put forward just to further minimize the sum of the distance traveled by all the students.
(0, 4) (8, 7) (6, 15) (6, 4) none of these
69. The ratio of the number of student in two centers of the first two problems is given by
23:18 17:24 29:12 30:11 none of these
70. If the team decided to open two centers in a way such that the sum of the total distances traveled by all the students is minimum. Find out the coordinates of these two centers along the grid line. (do not use data from the previous question)
(0, 4) & (8, 7) (0, 4) & (6, 15) (8, 7) & (6, 15) (6, 15) & (6, 4) none of these



Attachment 10149
what is the logic behind this question? I couldn't get it... is it calculating the centroid or something like that for the pentagon or there's some other funda behind it? In the first q, does the total distance minimum implies individual distance from the college to the center should be min?


Goal - So Near, Yet So Far

My CAT Experience
My mock scores of season'08
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#529)
nikunj14_83
has no status.
Trainee PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 92
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 13
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: lucknow..currently in bangalore
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 15-07-2008, 09:41 AM

Hi Puys,
I am just not able to interpret this ques so plz help me out in this one....


Ans are-
1)Stage 3
2)No change
3) 4
4) Healthy & Infected
Attached Files
File Type: doc Question of DI.doc (94.5 KB, 101 views)

Last edited by nikunj14_83; 15-07-2008 at 09:45 AM..
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#530)
sarsij
http://sarsiz.blogspot.com
Hardcore PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 425
Groans: 5
Groaned at 21 Times in 10 Posts
Thanks: 218
Thanked 563 Times in 174 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bangalore
Age: 28
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 15-07-2008, 10:49 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by nikunj14_83 View Post
Hi Puys,
I am just not able to interpret this ques so plz help me out in this one....


Ans are-
1)Stage 3
2)No change
3) 4
4) Healthy & Infected

Hey......I tried to solve it.....and it looked as if I could have cracked at least 3 questions in the actual exam condition........

Here is what I can tell you....

Make this chart.......
Initially Stahe 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Healthy -> 48% 53.33% 33.33% 11.11%
Infected -> 32% 24.33% 44% 44.44%
Resistant -> 20% 22.67% 22.67% 44.45%

Here if you assume that initially there were 48 Healthy plants and 32 Infected plants and 20 Resistsnt plants then you can keep on calculating the number of plants in later stages. Also keep in mind the following rules which are mentioned in the question

1. Healthy + Infected = Healthy becomes Infected (i.e. number of healthy plants decreases and Infected ones increases, this happens in Stage 2.)

2. Infected + Resistant = Infected Plants die out (ie, Number of Infected plants will decrese and the Number of Resistant plants will remain same)

3. Resistant + Healthy = Healthy PLants will become Resistant (ie, Number of Resistant plants will increase and the number of healthy plants will decrease).

I hope I have made the question clear. Guess it should not be difficult to crack it now.

Hope it helps
  Send a message via Yahoo to sarsij  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

» Sponsors










PaGaLGuY.com is not responsible for the views and opinions of the posters.
PaGaLGuY.com is an Inzane Labs Private Limited production.
Hosted on servers powered by Neutral Web