THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - Page 51
PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM
         Home          MBA Forums         PG Office Blog         Contact Us         About Us                  Jobs @ PG
Exclusive Bschool Content:      Interviews      B-School Watch     MBAs speak     Placements     GMAT & MBA Abroad      Form Notifications
» Sponsors






Go Back   PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM > Exam Resources > Quantitative Questions and Answers

Notices
Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe !

Tags: , , ,

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#501)
soumya1
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Thanks: 102
Thanked 184 Times in 56 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bangalore
Age: 24
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 09-07-2008, 05:58 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by implex View Post
71. 3
72. 3
73. 2
74. 2
75. 5

its an easy set!
just we need to understand that the no of candys are of the form 4(8k+1)
this will do it !

Hii...implex,
can u tell me hw u gt this 4(8k+1) do we get this directly???
I solved all the 5 qs....this mite be a simple way..Do tell??/
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#502)
implex
is Bak
Certified PaGaL
 
implex's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 2,227
Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 2,146 Times in 851 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kanpur
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 09-07-2008, 06:39 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by soumya1 View Post
Hii...implex,
can u tell me hw u gt this 4(8k+1) do we get this directly???
I solved all the 5 qs....this mite be a simple way..Do tell??/
see all the values we get should eb integers
I started with 4y as he brought in equal numbers for all

now
we get numbers like (3y-3)/8
clearly y should be of the form of 8k+1

and thus go ahead, you might not need to solve all the equations
   
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to implex For This Useful Post:
soumya1 (10-07-2008)
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#503)
nihilist1986
immoral till mortality !!!
Hardcore PaGaL
 
nihilist1986's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 741
Thanks: 699
Thanked 986 Times in 412 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Location: delhi
Age: 22
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 09-07-2008, 06:56 PM

73. If the number of candies that Pooja got was equal to the number of candies that both Upasana and
Tanisha got together, how many candies did "Deepak bring?
(1) 100 (2) 132 (3) 164 (4) 200 (5) Cannot be determined

I have a doubt in this question.. cudnt deepak bring 66 candies or 198..

shouldnt d answer be option 5 in this case.. i.e. cnt be determined as dpk cud hv brought different number of choclates..

plz clarify..

thanxx


Success is not a destination, but a road tat never ends.. so keep travelling !!!
-- nihilist1986
" There's no limit to what u can do, if you don't care who gets the credit"

"100 times worth reading. An inspiration for all"

reason behind that odd username


   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#504)
mba.yodha
"Down but not yet out"
Expert PaGaL
 
mba.yodha's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 136
Thanks: 116
Thanked 136 Times in 44 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mysore
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 09-07-2008, 07:02 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by nihilist1986 View Post
73. If the number of candies that Pooja got was equal to the number of candies that both Upasana and
Tanisha got together, how many candies did "Deepak bring?
(1) 100 (2) 132 (3) 164 (4) 200 (5) Cannot be determined

I have a doubt in this question.. cudnt deepak bring 66 candies or 198..

shouldnt d answer be option 5 in this case.. i.e. cnt be determined as dpk cud hv brought different number of choclates..

plz clarify..

thanxx
If u take 4x as the total candies and go by the conditions:
Pooja = x+3
Ramneet = (3x-3)/4
Upasana = (3x-3)/4
Tanisha = (3x-3)/8

Now according to ques
x+3 = (3x-3)/4 + (3x-3)/8

On solving x=33
so Candies by Deepak = 4x = 4*33 = 132

Hope it helps



"
Fairy tales are more than true; not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten."
   
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mba.yodha For This Useful Post:
nihilist1986 (09-07-2008)
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#505)
implex
is Bak
Certified PaGaL
 
implex's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 2,227
Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 2,146 Times in 851 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kanpur
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 09-07-2008, 07:05 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by nihilist1986 View Post
73. If the number of candies that Pooja got was equal to the number of candies that both Upasana and
Tanisha got together, how many candies did "Deepak bring?
(1) 100 (2) 132 (3) 164 (4) 200 (5) Cannot be determined

I have a doubt in this question.. cudnt deepak bring 66 candies or 198..

shouldnt d answer be option 5 in this case.. i.e. cnt be determined as dpk cud hv brought different number of choclates..

plz clarify..

thanxx
no!! its' correct
4(8k+1) is the first criteria
then we have
y+3=(3y-3)/4+(3y-3)/8
8y+24=9y-9
y=33
so candy is 33.4=132
   
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to implex For This Useful Post:
nihilist1986 (09-07-2008)
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#506)
implex
is Bak
Certified PaGaL
 
implex's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 2,227
Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 2,146 Times in 851 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kanpur
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 09-07-2008, 07:18 PM

Problems 76-77
Use the usual options for DS

76) abc
+def
---------
xyz
If in this addition a,b,c,d,e,f,x,y,z are distinct single digit positive integers . What is Z?

X:3a=f=6y
Y:f-c=3

77) A number of apples and oranges are to be distributed among evenly among a number of baskets. Each basket will contain atleast one of each type of fruit. If there are 20 oranges to be distributed, What is the minimum no of apples needed so that every basket contains less than twice as many apples as oranges.?

X: If the number of baskets were halved and all other conditions remained same, there would be twice as many oranges in every remaining basket.

Y: If the number of oranges were halved it would be no longer possible to place an orange in each basket.
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#507)
marijuana_user
Beer Leader and Founder BB'B'T 08
Hardcore PaGaL
 
marijuana_user's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 603
Thanks: 1,273
Thanked 1,258 Times in 336 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Delhi
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 09-07-2008, 08:10 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by implex View Post
Problems 76-77
Use the usual options for DS

76) abc
+def
---------
xyz
If in this addition a,b,c,d,e,f,x,y,z are distinct single digit positive integers . What is Z?

X:3a=f=6y
Y:f-c=3

77) A number of apples and oranges are to be distributed among evenly among a number of baskets. Each basket will contain atleast one of each type of fruit. If there are 20 oranges to be distributed, What is the minimum no of apples needed so that every basket contains less than twice as many apples as oranges.?

X: If the number of baskets were halved and all other conditions remained same, there would be twice as many oranges in every remaining basket.

Y: If the number of oranges were halved it would be no longer possible to place an orange in each basket.
For 76 only A would suffice as:

c=3.. other possible values can be 7,8,9 but then checking further,shows that more den one variable has the same integral value.

77. it's too confusing. Is the condition this :: 2A<O ??? Rushing to
office

Regards!
Marijuana!


Member NCT DT '08'!!

Beerleader!!!!!

BB'B'T 08!!!!!
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#508)
nimisha_2009
has no status.
Trainee PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 76
Thanks: 19
Thanked 13 Times in 7 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: delhi
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 09-07-2008, 08:58 PM

hey..heres a simple question but i dint know the proper way of finding the answer...plz let me know..

When asked the time of the day, a problem-posing professor answered, "If you add one-eighth of the time from noon until now to one-quarter the time from now until noon tomorrow, you get the time exactly." What time was it?

Choose one answer.
a. 5: 20 b. 5: 08: 32 c. 5: 03 d. 5: 45
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#509)
tufanhere
has no status.
Newbie PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 2
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hyderabad
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 09-07-2008, 09:01 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by implex View Post
Problems 76-77
Use the usual options for DS

76) abc
+def
---------
xyz
If in this addition a,b,c,d,e,f,x,y,z are distinct single digit positive integers . What is Z?

X:3a=f=6y
Y:f-c=3

77) A number of apples and oranges are to be distributed among evenly among a number of baskets. Each basket will contain atleast one of each type of fruit. If there are 20 oranges to be distributed, What is the minimum no of apples needed so that every basket contains less than twice as many apples as oranges.?

X: If the number of baskets were halved and all other conditions remained same, there would be twice as many oranges in every remaining basket.

Y: If the number of oranges were halved it would be no longer possible to place an orange in each basket.

For Q.76 X is sufficient condition and
for Q.77 I think both the conditions are insufficient.
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#510)
Topgear
What has brought u here, the same will look after u :)
Expert PaGaL
 
Topgear's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 163
Thanks: 113
Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: !!!
Age: 23
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 09-07-2008, 09:42 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by nimisha_2009 View Post
hey..heres a simple question but i dint know the proper way of finding the answer...plz let me know..

When asked the time of the day, a problem-posing professor answered, "If you add one-eighth of the time from noon until now to one-quarter the time from now until noon tomorrow, you get the time exactly." What time was it?

Choose one answer.
a. 5: 20 b. 5: 08: 32 c. 5: 03 d. 5: 45
Let time now is Ahrs(60A mins) and B mins.

according to eqn..

(60A+B)/8 + [24*60 - (60A+B)]/4 = 60A+B

Simplifying gives:

60A+B=320..

Hence options (a) satisfies..
   
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Topgear For This Useful Post:
marijuana_user (10-07-2008), nimisha_2009 (10-07-2008)
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

» Sponsors










PaGaLGuY.com is not responsible for the views and opinions of the posters.
PaGaLGuY.com is an Inzane Labs Private Limited production.
Hosted on servers powered by Neutral Web