THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - Page 5
PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM
         Home          MBA Forums         PG Office Blog         Contact Us         About Us                  Jobs @ PG
Exclusive Bschool Content:      Interviews      B-School Watch     MBAs speak     Placements     GMAT & MBA Abroad      Form Notifications
» Sponsors






Go Back   PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM > Exam Resources > Quantitative Questions and Answers

Notices
Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe !

Tags: , , ,

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#41)
naresh007
The QUEST for my elusive dream is ON!
Hardcore PaGaL
 
naresh007's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 291
Groans: 2
Groaned at 5 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks: 149
Thanked 225 Times in 91 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: HYD
Thumbs up Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 08-02-2008, 04:51 PM

Hello Puy’s…

As I’m not gonaa be online on this weekend plz find my 2 questions...

Here’s one easy pick… especially for noob’s….

Question. No: 8 AGE of Brothers

Jordan, Justin and Jeff are brothers whose ages are 29, 30 and 31 (in any order). Your job is to determine the brothers' ages from the clues below. There's one catch though....only ONE clue is true. The rest are false. Good luck!

1. Justin is 30
2. Jordan is the youngest
3. Jordan is 31
4. Justin is one year older and one year younger than his brothers.
5. Justin is not the youngest.
6. Jordan is not two years older than Justin.
7. Justin is the oldest
8. Jeff is older than Jordan.

Another Question. No: 9

Question No: 9 FIVE Businessmen

These five businessmen represented different companies at a recent trade fair. Unfortunately, the hotel they were all due to stay in had accidentally double booked their rooms. They tried other hotels in the area, but all were fully booked. Consequently, they all agreed to share the only two rooms available in the hotel - one twin and one triple.

From the clues, can you work out each man's name, company and official title?

1. When the five men realized their dilemma, they drew straws to see who would share with whom. The outcome for four of them was that the CEO shared with the businessman from ABM Inc. and Edgar shared with the Developer.
2. Alan does not work for Reed Right and is not the Director. The Director does not work for Lantel or Blue Teeth.
3. Neither Clarkson nor Grimaldi works for Reed Right. Grimaldi is either the IT Analyst or the CEO.
4. The businessman from Reed Right did not share a room with Thomas.
5. Clarkson, who does not work for Lantel, shared with either Thomas or Grimaldi but not both.
6. Edgar's surname is either Casson or Graves. Edgar did not share with Carl.
7. The businessman from Chiptech shared with the businessman from Lantel.
8. The CEO shared with the IT Analyst.
9. Casson works for either Blue Teeth or Chiptech.
10. Neither Joshua nor Alan works for ABM Inc.
11. Fielder shared with the Director.
12. The Accountant from Blue Teeth shared with the Developer.

First names: Alan, Carl, Edgar, Joshua, Thomas.
Last names: Casson, Clarkson, Fielder, Graves, Grimaldi.
Company: ABM Inc., Blue Teeth, Chiptech, Lantel, Reed

Well, then catch you all on monday....

Have A Great Weekend......
Keep Rockin....n....Keep Solving...Puy's.

  Send a message via Yahoo to naresh007  
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#42)
neversaydie_001
the war begins
Expert PaGaL
 
neversaydie_001's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Groans: 5
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 166
Thanked 151 Times in 81 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Delhi
Age: 23
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 08-02-2008, 05:02 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by naresh007 View Post
Hello..Puy's..

Well...on weekend's i won't be online...so, i'm posting few more extra Problems....
so, that you don't hav any problem for finding a problem on this Thread...

Here come's my Questions

Question No- 3 : Family Tree.
I was going through some old family photos in the attic when I stumbled upon our family tree. I studied it for a couple minutes then went back down stairs to tell my mom about the family tree. The problem is I didn't study it long enough to remember the whole thing. I only remembered a couple things about it, and recent memories. Can you help me figure out my family tree? There are two grandparents, who had two children, who both got married and had 2 more children each. Totalling 10 people in all (Alex, David, Jamie, Jessica, John, Justin, Lincoln, Martha, Mary and Tina).

1. One of Jamie's ancestors was David.

2. John's sister gave birth to Tina.

3. Mary went bowling with her nephew last Saturday.

4. Alex is cousins with one of the girls.

5. Justin married Mary.

6. Jessica is not an ancestor, nor cousin of Tina.

7. Lincoln's brother showed Justin's son his baseball cards.


Question No- 4 : Order
Five swimmers (Adam, Brad, Carl, Doug, and Eric) have been preparing for the Olympics. It is now time for the swimming time trials. The five swimmers each compete in the four different strokes (backstroke, breaststroke, butterfly, and freestyle). The top three finishers in each event will qualify for the Olympic swim team in that stroke. Using the following clues, determine the order of finish in each of the four strokes.

1) Only one contestant qualified in all four strokes.
2) No contestant finished last in more than one event.
3) Adam finished better in the backstroke than he did in the butterfly.
4) Brad finished better than Doug in the butterfly.
5) Adam finished just behind Brad and just ahead of Eric in the breaststroke.
6) Doug finished just ahead of Carl in the freestyle.
7) Neither Brad nor Eric finished third in any event.
Eric's finish in the backstroke was the same as Doug's in the butterfly.
9) Doug only finished in the same position in the backstroke and the freestyle.
10) Carl finished in a different position in each event.
11) Brad finished only two events in the same position.
12) The contestant who finished second in the butterfly beat Doug in the freestyle.
13) The contestant who finished first in the freestyle did not qualify in the backstroke.
14) The contestant who finished fifth in the backstroke did not finish third in the butterfly.
15) No contestant finished in the same position in both the breaststroke and the butterfly.


Question No- 5 : Riddle

One and half score, the posts are showing,
win, place, and show united is rejection as a marking;
the middle five of the whole, a type of setting,
the last eight is a man prone to writing.

Four in one, its middle two is a cannon booming,
with bursts of fire like a hundred stars dancing;
within that center is a country if you're looking,
a city you'll find,if you focus on the beginning.

Its first quarter is a letter with a greeting,
the next,a memory with one millennium missing;
then a duke,a prince or a king,
the last,an endless catch in the sport of fishing.

QUESTION: What is the word?

Well..then keep solving.
Have A Great Weekend..

hey wat is the answer to quesn no. 5????


A TRUE BLUE FAN

MY MOCK CAT SCORES:
http://www.pagalguy.com/forum/cat-an...ml#post1161406
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#43)
amresh_maverick
Enroute To Crack CAT
Newbie PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 20
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Location: bhubaneswar
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 08-02-2008, 05:07 PM

i suppose option "Jordan is not two years older than Justin" is correct . this makes jordan 1 yr older than justin . thus jordan 30 justin 29 jeff 31
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#44)
shankey_595
has no status.
Trainee PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 73
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 12
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: gurgaon
Age: 22
Angry Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 08-02-2008, 06:02 PM

i made the third clue right
and all other opposed dis particular clue
ans is jordan is 30
justin is 29
jeff is 31
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#45)
Rockeeze
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
 
Rockeeze's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 212
Groans: 2
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 314
Thanked 116 Times in 65 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Delhi
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 08-02-2008, 07:15 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by shankey_595 View Post
i made the third clue right
and all other opposed dis particular clue
ans is jordan is 30
justin is 29
jeff is 31
hi
i too made the third clue correct
which states tht
jordan 31
hence, justin 29 and jeff 30
regards
rock


I'm a great believer of LUCK & i find the HARDER i work the more i get it !!
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#46)
Iota
ctrl+f [IIM]
Hardcore PaGaL
 
Iota's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 258
Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 1 Post
Thanks: 239
Thanked 185 Times in 98 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Jupiter
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 08-02-2008, 09:36 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by naresh007 View Post
Hello Puy’s…

As I’m not gonaa be online on this weekend plz find my 2 questions...

Here’s one easy pick… especially for noob’s….

Question. No: 8 AGE of Brothers

Jordan, Justin and Jeff are brothers whose ages are 29, 30 and 31 (in any order). Your job is to determine the brothers' ages from the clues below. There's one catch though....only ONE clue is true. The rest are false. Good luck!

1. Justin is 30
2. Jordan is the youngest
3. Jordan is 31
4. Justin is one year older and one year younger than his brothers.
5. Justin is not the youngest.
6. Jordan is not two years older than Justin.
7. Justin is the oldest
8. Jeff is older than Jordan.
Ans: third statement is true
hence the ages : jordon - 31
justin - 29
jeff - 30

pls confirm


"Tonight is a really special night for me - it was a dream for me just to play for Sao Paulo and one game for Brazil. But the Bible says God can give you more than you even ask for."
[font=Comic Sans MS][size=2] Kaka (Brazil,AC Milan)
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#47)
rmbt
why cant terrorist targets politicians!
D Ever-Green Mod
 
rmbt's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 6,237
Groans: 69
Groaned at 144 Times in 110 Posts
Thanks: 3,598
Thanked 9,855 Times in 3,336 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bangalore
Age: 25
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 08-02-2008, 11:34 PM

Making thread sticky and for reference, here is last year's thread:
http://www.pagalguy.com/forum/quanti...at-2007-a.html (*DI Marathon for CAT 2007*)

All the best.


"Only gud thing about the stone i encounter in my path is,when i cross them they become my milestones"
CAT 2008-09 Links click here |Life at DoMS IITM| Search|DoMS IITM 2009-11 Admission Queries

  Send a message via Yahoo to rmbt  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rmbt For This Useful Post:
naresh007 (12-02-2008)
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#48)
billy_mar
killing bugs in a cubicle
Trainee PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 41
Groans: 0
Groaned at 3 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 35
Thanked 47 Times in 22 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kolkata
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 10-02-2008, 06:53 PM

Hi PUYs,

Ans:

Question No 8: Clue no. 3.


Question no 9: posting the chart here:

First Name Last Name Title Company
Joshua Graves CEO Reed Light
Carl Grimaldi IT Ana. ABM Inc.

Edgar Casson Director Chiptech
Thomas Fielder Developer Lantel
Alan Clarkson Accountant Blueteeth

waiting for the answers.....
Thnx to Naresh for great brain teasers.... waiting for the next set...
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#49)
ashwinrulz
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
 
ashwinrulz's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 114
Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 44
Thanked 21 Times in 13 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: chennai
Age: 22
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 10-02-2008, 08:41 PM

hey just nw came across the thread....count me also...in it..
keep rockin...
keep pourin...


AsHwIN
  Send a message via Yahoo to ashwinrulz  
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#50)
Iota
ctrl+f [IIM]
Hardcore PaGaL
 
Iota's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 258
Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 1 Post
Thanks: 239
Thanked 185 Times in 98 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Jupiter
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 10-02-2008, 11:23 PM

Question 9 : Gotcha

CEO + Reed + Joshua Graves
IT + ABM + Carl Grimaldi

Dir + Chiptech + Edgar Casson
Developer + Lantel + Thomas Fielder
Acct + Bluetech + Alan Clarkson

the Catch is : Grimaldi is not associated with Reed , and he is Either IT or CEO
it doesnot mean that both the business man (IT analyst and CEO) wont be from REED. Initially i made the above mistake and made the puzzle a nightmare .

thanks for such a wonderful puzzle.Waiting for more to solve in the comin days
BTW hope the ans matches


"Tonight is a really special night for me - it was a dream for me just to play for Sao Paulo and one game for Brazil. But the Bible says God can give you more than you even ask for."
[font=Comic Sans MS][size=2] Kaka (Brazil,AC Milan)

Last edited by Iota; 10-02-2008 at 11:25 PM..
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

» Sponsors










PaGaLGuY.com is not responsible for the views and opinions of the posters.
PaGaLGuY.com is an Inzane Labs Private Limited production.
Hosted on servers powered by Neutral Web