THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - Page 11
PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM
         Home          MBA Forums         PG Office Blog         Contact Us         About Us                  Jobs @ PG
Exclusive Bschool Content:      Interviews      B-School Watch     MBAs speak     Placements     GMAT & MBA Abroad      Form Notifications
» Sponsors






Go Back   PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM > Exam Resources > Quantitative Questions and Answers

Notices
Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe !

Tags: , , ,

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#101)
neversaydie_001
the war begins
Expert PaGaL
 
neversaydie_001's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Groans: 5
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 166
Thanked 151 Times in 81 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Delhi
Age: 23
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 22-02-2008, 12:36 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by naresh007 View Post
Hello..puys...,

Find the teaser for the Day...Question.No: 16th

Billiards Tournament

Seven amateur billiards players gather to play a billiards tournament. The players were divided into two sections: Section A has 4 players; and Section B has 3 players. Each player played against every other player in his/her Section.


With the information below, can you determine each person's section, and to whom they won and lost.

Keep Rockin...n...Keep Solvin



Section A:Mary,Jill,Greg,John
Section B:Betty,Chris,Tina

Section A
Greg won against all players in his section.
Mary won against all but Greg.
Jill won against John but lost to the other two.

Section B
Tina defeated Chris.
Chris defeated Betty.
Betty defeated Tina.

Pretty easy one..


A TRUE BLUE FAN

MY MOCK CAT SCORES:
http://www.pagalguy.com/forum/cat-an...ml#post1161406
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#102)
vivs_d
hmmm.....
Trainee PaGaL
 
vivs_d's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 76
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 7
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bangalore
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 24-02-2008, 12:54 PM

There are a number of long fuses, of which you only know that they burn for exactly one hour after you light them at one end. However, you don't know whether they burn with constant speed. Fore example, the first half of the fuse is burned in only 10 minutes while the rest takes the other fifty minutes to burn completely. With what least number of fuses can you measure exactly seven eighths of an hour in time? You can safely assume that you have a lighter.
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#103)
Iota
ctrl+f [IIM]
Hardcore PaGaL
 
Iota's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 258
Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 1 Post
Thanks: 239
Thanked 185 Times in 98 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Jupiter
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 24-02-2008, 01:35 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by vivs_d View Post
There are a number of long fuses, of which you only know that they burn for exactly one hour after you light them at one end. However, you don't know whether they burn with constant speed. Fore example, the first half of the fuse is burned in only 10 minutes while the rest takes the other fifty minutes to burn completely. With what least number of fuses can you measure exactly seven eighths of an hour in time? You can safely assume that you have a lighter.
a very old puzzle .

number of candles required is 3.

lit all the three together, but the first one in bth the ends.
so the first one will be burnt out in 1/2 hr. the other two are left over to be burnt for 1/2 hr more.
now lit the second candle in the other end also. so this will burn it in 1/4 hrs. the last one is left to be burnt for 1/4 hrs.
lit @ the other end as well. it will take time of 1/8 hrs.
so total time = 1/2+1/4+1/8 = 7/8



"Tonight is a really special night for me - it was a dream for me just to play for Sao Paulo and one game for Brazil. But the Bible says God can give you more than you even ask for."
[font=Comic Sans MS][size=2] Kaka (Brazil,AC Milan)
   
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Iota For This Useful Post:
roshi (26-06-2008)
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#104)
implex
is Bak
Certified PaGaL
 
implex's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 2,227
Groans: 18
Groaned at 18 Times in 12 Posts
Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 2,146 Times in 851 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kanpur
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 24-02-2008, 02:57 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iota View Post
a very old puzzle .

number of candles required is 3.

lit all the three together, but the first one in bth the ends.
so the first one will be burnt out in 1/2 hr. the other two are left over to be burnt for 1/2 hr more.
now lit the second candle in the other end also. so this will burn it in 1/4 hrs. the last one is left to be burnt for 1/4 hrs.
lit @ the other end as well. it will take time of 1/8 hrs.
so total time = 1/2+1/4+1/8 = 7/8

given the question if first half can burn in 10 mins and rest in 50 mins .. we cant assume what u did? can we ?

but there seems no other way to do it
   
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to implex For This Useful Post:
Iota (24-02-2008)
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING
Old
  (#105)
Iota
ctrl+f [IIM]
Hardcore PaGaL
 
Iota's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 258
Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 1 Post
Thanks: 239
Thanked 185 Times in 98 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Jupiter
Re: THE OFFCICAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASOING - 24-02-2008, 03:13 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by implex View Post
given the question if first half can burn in 10 mins and rest in 50 mins .. we cant assume what u did? can we ?

but there seems no other way to do it
ya exactly,
but the question also says that the candle to be burnt is in 1 hr total.
pls note that we are not considerin the fraction of candle burnt(which wont be uniform obviously ) but the time required -- which will always be 1 hr in total. e.g say after 15 mins the candle will need another 45 mins to burn completely....so here we can take the time as a base.isn't so?

i think this was the trck here in this puzzle...


"Tonight is a really special night for me - it was a dream for me just to play for Sao Paulo and one game for Brazil. But the Bible says God can give you more than you even ask for."
[font=Comic Sans MS][size=2] Kaka (Brazil,AC Milan)
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASONING
Old
  (#106)
naresh007
The QUEST for my elusive dream is ON!
Hardcore PaGaL
 
naresh007's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 291
Groans: 2
Groaned at 5 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks: 149
Thanked 225 Times in 91 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: HYD
Thumbs up Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASONING - 26-02-2008, 01:02 PM

Hello puys…. it’s been very long time I’m not posted.. sorry for the delay.

Here’s the answer for the Q.No:16th

Section A:

John: Lost to everyone.
Jill: Beat John, Lost to Mary and Greg.
Mary: Beat John, and Jill. Lost to Greg.
Greg: Beat everyone.

Section B:

Betty: Beat Tina. Lost to Chris.
Tina: Beat Chris. Lost to Betty.
Chris: Beat Betty. Lost to Tina.



Quote:
Originally Posted by naresh007 View Post
Question.No: 16th - Billiards Tournament

Seven amateur billiards players gather to play a billiards tournament. The players were divided into two sections: Section A has 4 players; and Section B has 3 players. Each player played against every other player in his/her Section.

Players: Betty, Chris, Greg, Jill, John, Mary, and Tina.

1. Every player from Section B has the same win-loss record.

2. John lost all of his games.

3. Mary, who defeated Jill, won more games than exactly 5 of the players.

4. Jill lost to Greg, and Tina defeated Chris.

With the information below, can you determine each person's section, and to whom they won and lost.

Keep Rockin...n...Keep Solvin


  Send a message via Yahoo to naresh007  
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASONING
Old
  (#107)
naresh007
The QUEST for my elusive dream is ON!
Hardcore PaGaL
 
naresh007's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 291
Groans: 2
Groaned at 5 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks: 149
Thanked 225 Times in 91 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: HYD
Thumbs up Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASONING - 26-02-2008, 01:10 PM

Hey Puys,


Find my today's Question.No: 17th -- Motor Bike Race Tournament

For Questions 1 to 5 read the following instructions:
Nine Bikes participated in a F1-MotorBike tournament. Five races were held in this tournament. The winner of a race gets 5 points, 2nd gets 3 and the 3rd gets 1. The table gives the point’s tally.

Bike: Points
A # 5
B # 5
C # 8
D # 2
E # 5
F # 6
G # 4
H # 10
I # 0

One race is held between five Bikes. The first race is held among the first 5 Bikes from the left in the above table. Out of these Bikes, A drops out of the race and a new Bike. I.e. F enters into the race. In the next race, B drops out and G enters and so on. It is also given that H is the only Bike that scored in 2 consecutive races.

Q.1) What was the position of Bike F in race 4?
a. 4th b. 2nd c. 3rd d. cannot be determined e.1st


Q.2)What is the ratio of the points scored by “G” and E in race 5?
a. 1:3 b. 3:1 c. 1:5 d. cannot be determined e. 5:1


Q.3) The first 3 rankers of the race 3 in some order?
a. C,E,G b. D,E,F c. C,D,F d. C,E,F e. C,G,F


Q.4) D could have come third in which of the following races?
a. Race 1 b. Race 3 c. Race 4 d. Race 5 e. cannot be determined


Q.5) Suppose if C had 6 points and E had 7 points while the points of the rest of the Bikes remain unchanged then E could’ve come second in
a. One race b. Two races c. At most one race d. At most 2 races e. cannot be determined

Keep Rockin...n...Keep Solvin
  Send a message via Yahoo to naresh007  
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASONING
Old
  (#108)
implex
is Bak
Certified PaGaL
 
implex's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 2,227
Groans: 18
Groaned at 18 Times in 12 Posts
Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 2,146 Times in 851 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kanpur
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASONING - 26-02-2008, 02:13 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by naresh007 View Post
Hey Puys,


Find my today's Question.No: 17th -- Motor Bike Race Tournament

For Questions 1 to 5 read the following instructions:
Nine Bikes participated in a F1-MotorBike tournament. Five races were held in this tournament. The winner of a race gets 5 points, 2nd gets 3 and the 3rd gets 1. The table gives the point’s tally.

Bike: Points
A # 5
B # 5
C # 8
D # 2
E # 5
F # 6
G # 4
H # 10
I # 0

One race is held between five Bikes. The first race is held among the first 5 Bikes from the left in the above table. Out of these Bikes, A drops out of the race and a new Bike. I.e. F enters into the race. In the next race, B drops out and G enters and so on. It is also given that H is the only Bike that scored in 2 consecutive races.

Q.1) What was the position of Bike F in race 4?
a. 4th b. 2nd c. 3rd d. cannot be determined e.1st


Q.2)What is the ratio of the points scored by “G” and E in race 5?
a. 1:3 b. 3:1 c. 1:5 d. cannot be determined e. 5:1


Q.3) The first 3 rankers of the race 3 in some order?
a. C,E,G b. D,E,F c. C,D,F d. C,E,F e. C,G,F


Q.4) D could have come third in which of the following races?
a. Race 1 b. Race 3 c. Race 4 d. Race 5 e. cannot be determined


Q.5) Suppose if C had 6 points and E had 7 points while the points of the rest of the Bikes remain unchanged then E could’ve come second in
a. One race b. Two races c. At most one race d. At most 2 races e. cannot be determined

Keep Rockin...n...Keep Solvin
answers
1 F stands 2nd in race 4 option b)
2 G/E can be 3:1 or 1:3 so cannot be determined exactly option d)
3.its option a) as C , E, G are the rankers their order can be C/E/G or C/G/E but order is immaterial to the question
4. D comes third in race 2 and race 4 so option C
5 .if the points get rearranged either E can come 2nd in 0 race or in 2 races
so option d
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASONING
Old
  (#109)
satanica
is drrrunk
Hardcore PaGaL
 
satanica's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 296
Groans: 74
Groaned at 13 Times in 6 Posts
Thanks: 272
Thanked 602 Times in 144 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sin City
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASONING - 26-02-2008, 02:26 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by naresh007 View Post
Hey Puys,


Question.No: 17th -- Motor Bike Race Tournament

First Race Point Distribution
A-5, B-0, C-3, D-0, E-1

Second Race Point Distribution
B-5, C-0, D-1, E-0, F-3

Third Race Point Distribution
C-5, D-0, F-0 (E and G's points cannot be determined)

Fourth Race Point Distribution
D-1, E-0, F-3, G-0, H-5

Fifth Race Point Distribution
F-0, H-5, I-0 (E and G's points cannot be determined)

Q1
Ans. b

Q2
Ans. d

Q3
Ans. a (considering 'some order' as any order)

Q4
Ans. c

Q5 (in doubt of the language of the question)
Ans. b or d
(only two scenarios are possible for E i.e. 7 = 5+1+1 = 3+3+1)



"You laugh at me because I am different, but I laugh at you because you are all the same."

Last edited by satanica; 26-02-2008 at 02:28 PM..
   
Reply With Quote
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASONING
Old
  (#110)
Iota
ctrl+f [IIM]
Hardcore PaGaL
 
Iota's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 258
Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 1 Post
Thanks: 239
Thanked 185 Times in 98 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Jupiter
Re: THE OFFICIAL CAT2008: DI - lOGICAL REASONING - 26-02-2008, 07:25 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by naresh007 View Post
Hey Puys,


Find my today's Question.No: 17th -- Motor Bike Race Tournament

Keep Rockin...n...Keep Solvin

1. F gets 3 points, so 2nd --> option (b).
2. ratio can be 3:1 and 1:3 -> so can't be determined --> option (c).
3. C,G,E option --> (a).
4. Race #4 ; option -->C.
5. at most 2 races ;option -->d.


"Tonight is a really special night for me - it was a dream for me just to play for Sao Paulo and one game for Brazil. But the Bible says God can give you more than you even ask for."
[font=Comic Sans MS][size=2] Kaka (Brazil,AC Milan)

Last edited by Iota; 26-02-2008 at 07:26 PM.. Reason: shortened the post
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

» Sponsors










PaGaLGuY.com is not responsible for the views and opinions of the posters.
PaGaLGuY.com is an Inzane Labs Private Limited production.
Hosted on servers powered by Neutral Web