official quant thread for cat08 - Page 844 - PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA in India and Abroad, CAT 2009, GMAT, XAT, MAT
PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA in India and Abroad, CAT 2009, GMAT, XAT, MAT
Forum Rules
» Sponsors
  PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA in India and Abroad, CAT 2009, GMAT, XAT, MAT > Exam Resources > Quantitative Questions and Answers
official quant thread for cat08
Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe !

Tags: , ,

» Thread Closed
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#8431)
user1285 user1285 is offline
Off PG till 2009
Expert PaGaL
 
user1285's Avatar
 
Posts: 224
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bangalore
Groans: 4
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 173
Thanked 132 Times in 60 Posts
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 28-08-2008, 12:11 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by poojadatta View Post
Two Person A and B started walking simultaneously from two point P and Q respectively along PS and QR the length of rectangle PQRS. By the time A reach S, B has reached T,the mid-point of QR. At this point they exchange their speed and continue walking towards R. If the length of the rectangle is 3 time its breath what should be the ration of present speed of A and B, so they reach R simultaneously.

1) 1:1 2) 2:3 3) 1:2 4) 4:5 5)3:2
Have a basic doubt
A walks alon PS
B along QR
Both PS and QR have same lengh
When A reaches S , B reaches half the length of QR -
Speed of A : Speed of B =2:1
After exchanging it it will be 1: 2
where am i going wrong ??
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
Sponsored Links
  (#8432)
raghav507 raghav507 is offline
~
The~Pahadi~Mod
Moderator

 
raghav507's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,910
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NO IDeA
Groans: 0
Groaned at 59 Times in 55 Posts
Thanks: 2,162
Thanked 2,300 Times in 867 Posts
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 28-08-2008, 12:15 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by poojadatta View Post
49/27

S = 1+4/7+(9/7^2)+(16/7^3)+(25/7^4)+......(1)
multiply (1) with 7
7S = 7+4+(9/7)+(16/7^2)+(25/7^3)+......(2)
(2)-(1)
6S = 10+(5/7)+(7/7^2)+(9/7^3)+......(3)
multiply (3) with 7 again
7*6S = 70+5+(7/7)+(9/7^2)+(11/7^3)......(4)
(4)-(3)
36S = 65 + 2(1/7 + 1/7^2 + .......)
= 65 + 2*1/6 = 196/3
=> S = 49/27

Ok this might be a silly question but I did not get the bold part.. can some help
my comments in bold...
hope it helps...


CHEERS
Raghav

Arun Sharma Articles (part 1)||(part 2)||My Blog
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
The Following User Says NO Thank You to raghav507 For This Un-useful Post:
vinod4u (29-01-2009)
  (#8433)
masoom masoom is offline
Blog Updated
Addicted PaGaL
 
masoom's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,283
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Gurgaon
Age: 24
Groans: 9
Groaned at 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks: 131
Thanked 421 Times in 256 Posts
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 28-08-2008, 12:17 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by poojadatta View Post
49/27

S = 1+4/7+(9/7^2)+(16/7^3)+(25/7^4)+......
7S = 7+4+(9/7)+(16/7^2)+(25/7^3)+......
6S = 10+(5/7)+(7/7^2)+(9/7^3)+......

7*6S = 70+5+(7/7)+(9/7^2)+(11/7^3)......
36S = 65 + 2(1/7 + 1/7^2 + .......)
= 65 + 2*1/6 = 196/3
=> S = 49/27
Ok this might be a silly question but I did not get the bold part.. can some help[/quote]

@pooja no question is silly to ask..

i tell you a standard method to tackle these type of problems..

whenever there is a series...

which gives a hint of GP and AP .. we always do sum by

multiplying by the common ratio...

here by observation we can find that CR is 1/7..

and the double difference of numerators are in AP...

so s=1+4/7+9/7^2+16/7^3...

1/7s= 1/7 + 4/7^2 + 9/7^3..

on subtracting : 6/7s= 1+ 3/7+5/7^2+..

now numerators are in AP.... so again repeat the same operation..

6/49s= 1/7+ 3/7^2+...

so 6/7s-6/49s= 1+ 2/7+2/7^2+....

i think u can proceed from here..


" prabisi nagar keeje sab kaaja...Hriday rakhi kosalpur raja "

-- "Ram Charit Manas"
------------------------------------------------
Rahul Agarwal
IMT Ghaziabad Finance (2009-2011)
------------------------------------------------
Moi Blog: http://masoom1.wordpress.com/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to masoom For This Useful Post:
dhanu_25 (28-08-2008), hi.shivani (28-08-2008), poojadatta (28-08-2008), raghav507 (28-08-2008)
  (#8434)
hi.shivani hi.shivani is offline
has no status.
Addicted PaGaL
PG MADCAPZ

 
hi.shivani's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,434
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Gurgaon
Groans: 0
Groaned at 21 Times in 7 Posts
Thanks: 740
Thanked 814 Times in 336 Posts
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 28-08-2008, 12:27 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by masoom View Post
what i think is that...

there is no need of the info that they exchange their speed..

as we have to find ratio of their current spped..

let length=l so breadth = l/3..

now let the correspinding speeds are v1, and v2..

so one person has to cover bredath ie l/3..

and other has to cover half the length ie l/2..

so (l/3)/(1/2)=v1/v2..

so from here v1/v2=2/3..
But how can we assume that PQ and QS is the length only??
If it is breadth then the ratio turnout to be 6:1.


Shivani
**************************************
When GOD is along & kaizen is on..success is for sure..!!

Moi Blah Blah Zone ll Moi Auto Zone ll Moi Biz Zone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
  (#8435)
poojadatta poojadatta is offline
SCIT-ITBM/IMT_n- HR/
Hardcore PaGaL
 
poojadatta's Avatar
 
Posts: 737
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Baroda/Bangalore/Trivandrum
Age: 25
Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 195
Thanked 460 Times in 202 Posts
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 28-08-2008, 12:33 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by hi.shivani View Post
But how can we assume that PQ and QS is the length only??
If it is breadth then the ratio turnout to be 6:1.
In question its given
PS and QR the length of rectangle PQRS
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
  (#8436)
poojadatta poojadatta is offline
SCIT-ITBM/IMT_n- HR/
Hardcore PaGaL
 
poojadatta's Avatar
 
Posts: 737
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Baroda/Bangalore/Trivandrum
Age: 25
Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 195
Thanked 460 Times in 202 Posts
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 28-08-2008, 12:47 PM

What I did was this
PS and QR are length and PQ ans SR are breath....
Time taken by A to travel PS

t1=3/s1-----1

In the same time B traveled QT which is

1.5=s2*(3/s1)----2

on solving 2 we get s2/s1=1/2

Now if we exchange the speed (it is exchange in ques then ino need to solve ans is 2:1 will become answer but if its change then which it should be as there is further question asked)
Now time take to travel by B from TQ is same as A takes to travel SR...

tB=1.5/y and tA=1/z (where y and z are speed of A and B after changing)

now tA=tB

1.5/y=1/z

z/y=2:3

So they have printing mistake it should be change..... as answer is 2:3

Last edited by poojadatta; 28-08-2008 at 12:52 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
  (#8437)
KillFRenzy KillFRenzy is offline
yaaaaaawn!
Expert PaGaL
 
Posts: 178
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Gurgaon
Age: 25
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 20
Thanked 26 Times in 14 Posts
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 28-08-2008, 12:48 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by masoom View Post
what i think is that...

there is no need of the info that they exchange their speed..

as we have to find ratio of their current spped..

let length=l so breadth = l/3..

now let the correspinding speeds are v1, and v2..

so one person has to cover bredth ie l/3..

and other has to cover half the length ie l/2..

so (l/3)/(1/2)=v1/v2..

so from here v1/v2=2/3..

and other has to cover half the length ie l/2..
other will cover half the breath...not half the length...hence l/6
v1/v2 = 2/1...

Now Remaining distance is...
for A (in order to reach R..it needs to cover entire length)
hence L.
for B, another L/6(coz breath is L/3..(and it already covered L/6))

hence speed ratio = 6:1
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
  (#8438)
dare2 dare2 is offline
day-dreaming
Hardcore PaGaL
 
Posts: 352
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: chandigarh
Age: 24
Groans: 1
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 42
Thanked 63 Times in 47 Posts
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 28-08-2008, 12:48 PM

lets do one more question on series.

find the sum of the first 50 terms of the series:
3, 7, 19, 45, 91, ............
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
  (#8439)
poojadatta poojadatta is offline
SCIT-ITBM/IMT_n- HR/
Hardcore PaGaL
 
poojadatta's Avatar
 
Posts: 737
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Baroda/Bangalore/Trivandrum
Age: 25
Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 195
Thanked 460 Times in 202 Posts
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 28-08-2008, 12:51 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by KillFRenzy View Post
and other has to cover half the length ie l/2..
other will cover half the breath...not half the length...hence l/6
v1/v2 = 2/1...

Now Remaining distance is...
for A (in order to reach R..it needs to cover entire length)
hence L.
for B, another L/6(coz breath is L/3..(and it already covered L/6))

hence speed ratio = 6:1

Its given that they travel on length PS and QR.. check out my solution hope its useful
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to poojadatta For This Useful Post:
KillFRenzy (28-08-2008)
  (#8440)
poojadatta poojadatta is offline
SCIT-ITBM/IMT_n- HR/
Hardcore PaGaL
 
poojadatta's Avatar
 
Posts: 737
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Baroda/Bangalore/Trivandrum
Age: 25
Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 195
Thanked 460 Times in 202 Posts
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 28-08-2008, 01:04 PM

Each of two lifting machine delivering only 90% of its rated power, works for 6 hours per day for 4 days and lifts 4500 tonnes of material. If three such machines, delivering only 80% of the same rated power as first two machines, are scheduled to lift 6000 tonnes in 3 days, how may hours per day should each vehicle works

1)4 2) 2 3) 6 4) 8 5) 18

Any take for this I am confused with directly proportional and indirect proportional....
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
» Thread Closed

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsors

PaGaLGuY.com is not responsible for the views and opinions of the posters.
PaGaLGuY.com is an Inzane Labs Private Limited production.