| | Notices | Welcome to the PaGaLGuY.com MBA forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us at info [at] pagalguy.com | Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe ! | | | |
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 130 Groans: 1
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 72
Thanked 62 Times in 31 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Mumbai | Re: official quant thread for cat08 -
08-08-2008, 09:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LearnerToro  All multiples of 20. Hence 500. | Could you please explain how you arrived at this? | | |  | | | | |
has no status.
Trainee PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 30 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 6
Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Palani | Re: official quant thread for cat08 -
08-08-2008, 09:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ketce Could you please explain how you arrived at this? | Sorry its 50.
x is real number So 0<x>=0.
But For the result to be +ve x should be +ve
Hence x>0
if x=1 we get 20
x=2 we get 40
So all multiples of 20 and less than 1000.
Correct me if I am wrong. | | | | | | | |
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 143 Groans: 27
Groaned at 27 Times in 8 Posts
Thanks: 1,632
Thanked 147 Times in 51 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: timBUCKtoo | Re: official quant thread for cat08 -
08-08-2008, 09:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by implex Let us define a set f(n) such that
f(n)= n/2 if n is even
and f(n)=(n+1023)/2 if n is odd
let k be the least positive integer such that f(f(f(k)))=k and m be the least positive integer such that f(f(f(f(f(m)))))=m
then k+m equals? | can v have the options for this question?
CAT IN THE UNDERTOW!!
JUST......CAT IN THE UNDERTOW!!
| | | | | | | |
is Bak
Certified PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 2,227 Groans: 18
Groaned at 18 Times in 12 Posts
Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 2,146 Times in 851 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Kanpur | Re: official quant thread for cat08 -
08-08-2008, 09:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUPER XERO can v have the options for this question? | 2, 34, 374, 1056 none of these | | | | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to implex For This Useful Post: | | | | | |
is Bak
Certified PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 2,227 Groans: 18
Groaned at 18 Times in 12 Posts
Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 2,146 Times in 851 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Kanpur | Re: official quant thread for cat08 -
08-08-2008, 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LearnerToro Sorry its 50.
x is real number So 0<x>=0.
But For the result to be +ve x should be +ve
Hence x>0
if x=1 we get 20
x=2 we get 40
So all multiples of 20 and less than 1000.
Correct me if I am wrong. | you are wrong, I can't find the logic behind your answer or solution ! | | | | | | | |
is Bak
Certified PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 2,227 Groans: 18
Groaned at 18 Times in 12 Posts
Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 2,146 Times in 851 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Kanpur | Re: official quant thread for cat08 -
08-08-2008, 09:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LearnerToro Sorry its 50.
x is real number So 0<x>=0.
But For the result to be +ve x should be +ve
Hence x>0
if x=1 we get 20
x=2 we get 40
So all multiples of 20 and less than 1000.
Correct me if I am wrong. | x need not be integer x is a real number !!! | | | | | | | |
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 143 Groans: 27
Groaned at 27 Times in 8 Posts
Thanks: 1,632
Thanked 147 Times in 51 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: timBUCKtoo | Re: official quant thread for cat08 -
08-08-2008, 09:58 PM
374 is the answer???
CAT IN THE UNDERTOW!!
JUST......CAT IN THE UNDERTOW!!
| | | | | The Following User Says Thank You to SUPER XERO For This Useful Post: | | | | | |
is Bak
Certified PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 2,227 Groans: 18
Groaned at 18 Times in 12 Posts
Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 2,146 Times in 851 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Kanpur | Re: official quant thread for cat08 -
08-08-2008, 10:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUPER XERO 374 is the answer??? | yes , what is the logic? | | | | | | | |
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 143 Groans: 27
Groaned at 27 Times in 8 Posts
Thanks: 1,632
Thanked 147 Times in 51 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: timBUCKtoo | Re: official quant thread for cat08 -
08-08-2008, 10:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by implex yes , what is the logic? | the logic is..... other 4 options seem vague.......that is y i asked you for the options......
It would be great if u shed light on the solution of this problem.
thanks...
CAT IN THE UNDERTOW!!
JUST......CAT IN THE UNDERTOW!!
| | | | | The Following User Says Thank You to SUPER XERO For This Useful Post: | | | | | |
is Bak
Certified PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 2,227 Groans: 18
Groaned at 18 Times in 12 Posts
Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 2,146 Times in 851 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Kanpur | Re: official quant thread for cat08 -
08-08-2008, 10:24 PM
I am ready with my problem set 4. hope you guys enjoy it as before. Solutions and answer key is embedded in it . Enjoy !
In this post you have the quant problem set 4
and also the previous sets and their solutions combined in one zip file | | | | | The Following 32 Users Say Thank You to implex For This Useful Post: | abhimit22 (09-08-2008), Abhitsian (09-08-2008), catgotmytongue (18-08-2008), exile (28-08-2008), getintoiimb (09-08-2008), itsromiljain (23-09-2008), Khyati_a_jain (05-09-2008), LearnerToro (08-08-2008), linksuresh (10-08-2008), mahi101987 (09-08-2008), maninblue (11-08-2008), Manish Jalan (14-10-2008), medulla (11-10-2008), monsterkartik (13-10-2008), naga25french (09-08-2008), nakul.punhani (12-08-2008), nana86 (24-09-2008), neversaydie_001 (13-10-2008), Phoenix12 (14-08-2008), pink_flo_yd (01-10-2008), piyushpth (30-10-2008), sahil2301 (14-08-2008), sahilbansal (22-08-2008), sandeep.dcet (17-09-2008), smileyface (09-10-2008), subho_86 (08-08-2008), sugandha3 (04-09-2008), tarunkabra (25-09-2008), td31 (10-08-2008), umeshlives (19-08-2008), venCat08 (09-08-2008), vickythakre (30-08-2008) | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | |
| |
