| | Notices | Welcome to the PaGaLGuY.com MBA forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us at info [at] pagalguy.com | Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe ! | | | |
Just relax!
Certified PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 1,549 Groans: 50
Groaned at 16 Times in 15 Posts
Thanks: 6,692
Thanked 2,235 Times in 624 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Hyderabad | Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
13-03-2007, 12:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vineet.nitd Y not sir
If the intermediate image to be formed lies on the 2nd axis that means the distance x between the source and the 1st axis is equal to the distance between the first axis and the intermediate image and hence the 2nd axes .Which means PM=PP=x+x=2x  | yes it is ...  misunderstood .. | | | | | | | |
has no status.
Newbie PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 3 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Bangalore | Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
16-03-2007, 01:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mohit_353
3. How many numbers can be formed by using 8,7,5,3,2 such that they are divisible by
125 ? Digits to be used exactly once.
(1) 20 (2) 4 (3) 2 (4) 1 | The answer is (2) ... 4 numbers can be formed by using 8,7,5,3,2. | | | | | | | |
Missed on JB :-(
Expert PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 230 Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 61
Thanked 89 Times in 32 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Pune | Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
16-03-2007, 09:28 PM
the positive integer n is such that if the first digit is moved to become the last digit then the new no is 7n/2..The no of digits in smallest n are... I understood the approach that people have posted for this question but i was not able to figure out where i am going wrong Heres my solution (following amar_kashyaps method of solving) n=(10^m)a+b 7/2 (10^m a+b) = 10b + a
=> 7(10^m a + b) = 20b + 2a
=> 7.(10^m).a + 7.b =20b + 2a
=> 13b = a(7.10^m - 2)
now 10^m = 4 mod 13 10* 10^m = 40 mod 13 = 1 => 10^(m+1) = 1 mod 13 => m+1 = 12 (euler number for 13) but i know its 6 and not 12...... whats my mistake???? | | | | | | | |
Missed on JB :-(
Expert PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 230 Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 61
Thanked 89 Times in 32 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Pune | Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
16-03-2007, 10:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vineet.nitd Let the number N be xyz =11k => to be a multiple of 11 we must have x+z-y=11 m where , m = 0 or 1 (for a 3 digit number)
Case1:
m=0
hence k=10x+z = 2(x^2 +xz +z^2)
=>x^2+z^2+xz = 5x + z/2
Hence z shud be even .
For, z=0 , x=5 {discard x=0} giving N=550
For ,z=2 , x^2+3-3x=0 which does not have real roots and so will bge the case for z>2
Hence only one soln i.e N=550
case2 :
m=1
here min value of x and z must be 2 .
for x=2 , we can only have 209 (does nt satisfy)
for x=3 , we can have min val 308 , 3^2+8^2 >28 hence no other value also satisfies
for x=4 , 4^2+7^2 >37 hence no other gr8er value also satisfies
x=5 , , 5^2+6^2 >46 (No value satisfies)
x=6 , 5^2+6^2 > 55 (No value satisfies)
x=7 ,4^2+7^2 >64 (No value satisfies)
x=8 , 8^2+3^2=73 (satisfies) for 803 but no greater value than this
x=9 , 2^2 +9^2 >82 (No value satisfies)
Hence there are only 2 such numbers 550 and 803  | I preetty much understood the case when m=0 but dint follow the case when m=1
Could someone please elaborate on the second case.......... | | | | | | | |
I will come back...
Hardcore PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 541 Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 199
Thanked 277 Times in 166 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Omnipresent | Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
16-03-2007, 10:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Destiny's_Child the positive integer n is such that if the first digit is moved to become the last digit then the new no is 7n/2..The no of digits in smallest n are... I understood the approach that people have posted for this question but i was not able to figure out where i am going wrong Heres my solution (following amar_kashyaps method of solving) n=(10^m)a+b 7/2 (10^m a+b) = 10b + a => 7(10^m a + b) = 20b + 2a => 7.(10^m).a + 7.b =20b + 2a => 13b = a(7.10^m - 2) now 10^m = 4 mod 13 10* 10^m = 40 mod 13 = 1 => 10^(m+1) = 1 mod 13 => m+1 = 12 (euler number for 13) but i know its 6 and not 12...... whats my mistake???? |
u r not wrong here....both 10^5 and 10^11 gives a reminder of 4 when divided by 13..
but the qustion is to find out the smallest number , so the answer is 5+1 =6.... --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- O, Wind,
If winter comes,
can Spring be far behind? —Percy Bysshe Shelley | | | | | | | |
Missed on JB :-(
Expert PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 230 Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 61
Thanked 89 Times in 32 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Pune | Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
16-03-2007, 11:22 PM
1. u have to weigh 1 to 40 kgs and u have to find the min number of weights required to do this I find the weights required as 1 , 3, 9 ,27 ( minimum number of weights as 4) ...... Is that correct????? @doomsayer So that means i need to check all values of m for 10^m = 4 mod 13 where m<12 ????? | | | | | | | |
I will come back...
Hardcore PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 541 Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 199
Thanked 277 Times in 166 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Omnipresent | Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
16-03-2007, 11:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Destiny's_Child 1. u have to weigh 1 to 40 kgs and u have to find the min number of weights required to do this I find the weights required as 1 , 3, 9 ,27 ( minimum number of weights as 4) ...... Is that correct????? @doomsayer So that means i need to check all values of m for 10^m = 4 mod 13 where m<12 ????? |
definitely,since the question is abt finding the smallest number....may be some value 10^100xxx might be satisfy the condition, but u cannt tell thats the ans...
regading weight wala queston ur ans is correct, In a normal thraaass where we can use both sides, by using those 4 weights we measure all weigts till 40 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- O, Wind,
If winter comes,
can Spring be far behind? —Percy Bysshe Shelley | | | | | The Following User Says Thank You to doomsayer For This Useful Post: | | | | | |
Missed on JB :-(
Expert PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 230 Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 61
Thanked 89 Times in 32 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Pune | Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
17-03-2007, 12:48 AM
I find it very difficult to solve problems of the type a^b^c^d^e
are there any particular steps tobe folllowed here to make them easy to crack????
For eg What is the last digit of 22^33^44^55^66^77??
Also can somebody solve this problem - A watch ticks 90 times in 95 seconds and another watch ticks 315 times in 323 seconds. If both the watches are started together, how many times will they tick in the first hour?
A] 100 B] 101 C] 102 D] 99 I have a doubt as to the answer will be 100 and 101(i.e. its first together tick would be counted or not)
Last edited by Destiny's_Child; 17-03-2007 at 01:19 AM..
| | | | | | | |
I will come back...
Hardcore PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 541 Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 199
Thanked 277 Times in 166 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Omnipresent | Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
17-03-2007, 09:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Destiny's_Child I find it very difficult to solve problems of the type a^b^c^d^e
are there any particular steps tobe folllowed here to make them easy to crack????
For eg What is the last digit of 22^33^44^55^66^77??
Also can somebody solve this problem - A watch ticks 90 times in 95 seconds and another watch ticks 315 times in 323 seconds. If both the watches are started together, how many times will they tick in the first hour?
A] 100 B] 101 C] 102 D] 99 I have a doubt as to the answer will be 100 and 101(i.e. its first together tick would be counted or not) |
last digit of 22^33^44^55^66^77 ---> 2 has a cylicity of 4 ,33^44^55^66^77 = 4k+1
>>>22^(4k+1)>>>>so the last digit is 2
ans of second questio is 101, u have to count their initial tick together --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- O, Wind,
If winter comes,
can Spring be far behind? —Percy Bysshe Shelley | | | | | The Following User Says Thank You to doomsayer For This Useful Post: | | | | | |
Missed on JB :-(
Expert PaGaL
Status: Offline Posts: 230 Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 61
Thanked 89 Times in 32 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Pune | Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
17-03-2007, 06:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by doomsayer last digit of 22^33^44^55^66^77 ---> 2 has a cylicity of 4 ,33^44^55^66^77 = 4k+1
>>>22^(4k+1)>>>>so the last digit is 2 | how do you come to arrive that 22^(4k+1)>>>>so the last digit is 2
agreed 33 = 4k + 1 but what about the other higher powers??? | | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |
| |