The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - Page 41
PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM
         Home          MBA Forums         PG Office Blog         Contact Us         About Us                  Jobs @ PG
Exclusive Bschool Content:      Interviews      B-School Watch     MBAs speak     Placements     GMAT & MBA Abroad      Form Notifications
» Sponsors






Go Back   PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM > Exam Resources > Quantitative Questions and Answers

Notices
Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe !

Tags: , , , ,

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#401)
krsh.vik
Just relax!
Certified PaGaL
 
krsh.vik's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,549
Groans: 50
Groaned at 16 Times in 15 Posts
Thanks: 6,692
Thanked 2,235 Times in 624 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hyderabad
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 13-03-2007, 12:16 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by vineet.nitd View Post
Y not sir

If the intermediate image to be formed lies on the 2nd axis that means the distance x between the source and the 1st axis is equal to the distance between the first axis and the intermediate image and hence the 2nd axes .Which means PM=PP=x+x=2x
yes it is ... misunderstood ..
   
Sponsored Links
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#402)
swatkat
has no status.
Newbie PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bangalore
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 16-03-2007, 01:35 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mohit_353 View Post

3. How many numbers can be formed by using 8,7,5,3,2 such that they are divisible by

125 ? Digits to be used exactly once.

(1) 20 (2) 4 (3) 2 (4) 1
The answer is (2) ... 4 numbers can be formed by using 8,7,5,3,2.
   
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#403)
Destiny's_Child
Missed on JB :-(
Expert PaGaL
 
Destiny's_Child's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 230
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 61
Thanked 89 Times in 32 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pune
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 16-03-2007, 09:28 PM

the positive integer n is such that if the first digit is moved to become the last digit then the new no is 7n/2..The no of digits in smallest n are...

I understood the approach that people have posted for this question but i was not able to figure out where i am going wrong

Heres my solution (following amar_kashyaps method of solving)

n=(10^m)a+b

7/2 (10^m a+b) = 10b + a
=> 7(10^m a + b) = 20b + 2a
=> 7.(10^m).a + 7.b =20b + 2a
=> 13b = a(7.10^m - 2)

now 10^m = 4 mod 13

10* 10^m = 40 mod 13 = 1
=> 10^(m+1) = 1 mod 13
=> m+1 = 12 (euler number for 13)

but i know its 6 and not 12......
whats my mistake????


   
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#404)
Destiny's_Child
Missed on JB :-(
Expert PaGaL
 
Destiny's_Child's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 230
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 61
Thanked 89 Times in 32 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pune
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 16-03-2007, 10:54 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by vineet.nitd View Post
Let the number N be xyz =11k => to be a multiple of 11 we must have x+z-y=11 m where , m = 0 or 1 (for a 3 digit number)
Case1:
m=0
hence k=10x+z = 2(x^2 +xz +z^2)
=>x^2+z^2+xz = 5x + z/2
Hence z shud be even .
For, z=0 , x=5 {discard x=0} giving N=550
For ,z=2 , x^2+3-3x=0 which does not have real roots and so will bge the case for z>2
Hence only one soln i.e N=550

case2 :
m=1
here min value of x and z must be 2 .
for x=2 , we can only have 209 (does nt satisfy)
for x=3 , we can have min val 308 , 3^2+8^2 >28 hence no other value also satisfies
for x=4 , 4^2+7^2 >37 hence no other gr8er value also satisfies
x=5 , , 5^2+6^2 >46 (No value satisfies)
x=6 , 5^2+6^2 > 55 (No value satisfies)
x=7 ,4^2+7^2 >64 (No value satisfies)
x=8 , 8^2+3^2=73 (satisfies) for 803 but no greater value than this
x=9 , 2^2 +9^2 >82 (No value satisfies)

Hence there are only 2 such numbers 550 and 803
I preetty much understood the case when m=0 but dint follow the case when m=1
Could someone please elaborate on the second case..........
   
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#405)
doomsayer
I will come back...
Hardcore PaGaL
 
doomsayer's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 541
Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 199
Thanked 277 Times in 166 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Omnipresent
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 16-03-2007, 10:57 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Destiny's_Child View Post
the positive integer n is such that if the first digit is moved to become the last digit then the new no is 7n/2..The no of digits in smallest n are...

I understood the approach that people have posted for this question but i was not able to figure out where i am going wrong

Heres my solution (following amar_kashyaps method of solving)

n=(10^m)a+b

7/2 (10^m a+b) = 10b + a
=> 7(10^m a + b) = 20b + 2a
=> 7.(10^m).a + 7.b =20b + 2a
=> 13b = a(7.10^m - 2)

now 10^m = 4 mod 13

10* 10^m = 40 mod 13 = 1
=> 10^(m+1) = 1 mod 13
=> m+1 = 12 (euler number for 13)

but i know its 6 and not 12......
whats my mistake????




u r not wrong here....both 10^5 and 10^11 gives a reminder of 4 when divided by 13..
but the qustion is to find out the smallest number , so the answer is 5+1 =6....


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
O, Wind,
If winter comes,
can Spring be far behind? —Percy Bysshe Shelley
   
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#406)
Destiny's_Child
Missed on JB :-(
Expert PaGaL
 
Destiny's_Child's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 230
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 61
Thanked 89 Times in 32 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pune
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 16-03-2007, 11:22 PM

1. u have to weigh 1 to 40 kgs and u have to find the min number of weights required to do this

I find the weights required as 1 , 3, 9 ,27 ( minimum number of weights as 4) ......
Is that correct?????

@doomsayer
So that means i need to check all values of m for
10^m = 4 mod 13 where m<12 ?????
   
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#407)
doomsayer
I will come back...
Hardcore PaGaL
 
doomsayer's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 541
Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 199
Thanked 277 Times in 166 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Omnipresent
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 16-03-2007, 11:41 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Destiny's_Child View Post
1. u have to weigh 1 to 40 kgs and u have to find the min number of weights required to do this

I find the weights required as 1 , 3, 9 ,27 ( minimum number of weights as 4) ......
Is that correct?????

@doomsayer
So that means i need to check all values of m for
10^m = 4 mod 13 where m<12 ?????


definitely,since the question is abt finding the smallest number....may be some value 10^100xxx might be satisfy the condition, but u cannt tell thats the ans...


regading weight wala queston ur ans is correct, In a normal thraaass where we can use both sides, by using those 4 weights we measure all weigts till 40


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
O, Wind,
If winter comes,
can Spring be far behind? —Percy Bysshe Shelley
   
The Following User Says Thank You to doomsayer For This Useful Post:
Destiny's_Child (17-03-2007)
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#408)
Destiny's_Child
Missed on JB :-(
Expert PaGaL
 
Destiny's_Child's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 230
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 61
Thanked 89 Times in 32 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pune
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 17-03-2007, 12:48 AM

I find it very difficult to solve problems of the type a^b^c^d^e

are there any particular steps tobe folllowed here to make them easy to crack????

For eg
What is the last digit of 22^33^44^55^66^77??


Also can somebody solve this problem
  • A watch ticks 90 times in 95 seconds and another watch ticks 315 times in 323 seconds. If both the watches are started together, how many times will they tick in the first hour?
    A] 100 B] 101 C] 102 D] 99
I have a doubt as to the answer will be 100 and 101(i.e. its first together tick would be counted or not)

Last edited by Destiny's_Child; 17-03-2007 at 01:19 AM..
   
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#409)
doomsayer
I will come back...
Hardcore PaGaL
 
doomsayer's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 541
Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 199
Thanked 277 Times in 166 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Omnipresent
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 17-03-2007, 09:14 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Destiny's_Child View Post
I find it very difficult to solve problems of the type a^b^c^d^e

are there any particular steps tobe folllowed here to make them easy to crack????

For eg
What is the last digit of 22^33^44^55^66^77??


Also can somebody solve this problem
  • A watch ticks 90 times in 95 seconds and another watch ticks 315 times in 323 seconds. If both the watches are started together, how many times will they tick in the first hour?
    A] 100 B] 101 C] 102 D] 99
I have a doubt as to the answer will be 100 and 101(i.e. its first together tick would be counted or not)

last digit of 22^33^44^55^66^77 ---> 2 has a cylicity of 4 ,33^44^55^66^77 = 4k+1
>>>22^(4k+1)>>>>so the last digit is 2


ans of second questio is 101, u have to count their initial tick together


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
O, Wind,
If winter comes,
can Spring be far behind? —Percy Bysshe Shelley
   
The Following User Says Thank You to doomsayer For This Useful Post:
rosh! (20-06-2007)
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#410)
Destiny's_Child
Missed on JB :-(
Expert PaGaL
 
Destiny's_Child's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 230
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 61
Thanked 89 Times in 32 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pune
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 17-03-2007, 06:40 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by doomsayer View Post
last digit of 22^33^44^55^66^77 ---> 2 has a cylicity of 4 ,33^44^55^66^77 = 4k+1
>>>22^(4k+1)>>>>so the last digit is 2
how do you come to arrive that
22^(4k+1)>>>>so the last digit is 2
agreed 33 = 4k + 1 but what about the other higher powers???
   
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

» Sponsors










PaGaLGuY.com is not responsible for the views and opinions of the posters.
PaGaLGuY.com is an Inzane Labs Private Limited production.
Hosted on servers powered by Neutral Web