|
| Other Exams - XAT, FMS, JMET, SNAP etc Institutes and exams other than the CAT can be discussed here. XAT, FMS, JMET, SNAP, NMAT, IBSAT etc. |
|
View Poll Results: How much did u score in XAT 2009? (Average of your scores from various keys)
|
|
< = 24
|
   
|
298 |
25.62% |
|
24.25 - 26
|
  
|
130 |
11.18% |
|
26.25 - 29
|
  
|
184 |
15.82% |
|
29.25 - 31.75
|
  
|
185 |
15.91% |
|
32 - 34
|
  
|
114 |
9.80% |
|
34.25 - 36
|
  
|
88 |
7.57% |
|
36.25 - 38
|
|
54 |
4.64% |
|
38.25 - 40
|
|
45 |
3.87% |
|
40.25 - 42
|
|
26 |
2.24% |
|
> 42
|
|
39 |
3.35% |
|
has no status.
Newbie PaGaL
Posts: 2
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: pune
Age: 25
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: XAT 2009: Jan 4th - The Overall Picture -
04-01-2009, 02:55 PM
My attempts,
VA --> 31
QA --> 13 (2 calculated guess) :sad:
LR --> 18
Total --> 62
Hopefully my accuracy is good enough !!
cheers
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to moda For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
Finally hardwork paid, in SIBM now
Trainee PaGaL
Posts: 74
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: delhi
Groans: 6
Groaned at 12 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks: 96
Thanked 51 Times in 20 Posts
|
Re: XAT 2009: Jan 4th - The Overall Picture -
04-01-2009, 02:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dibaka
ya it was around 41+
i dont hav a link
my friend got 40 but did not get a call frm XLRI ..
this year paper seems to be more inclined towards eliminating luck guys..
and scratching out cream students..
lets see..
|
buddy he must have got low sectionals , and that section is most probable maths.xl is very particular abt maths percentile.i saw that in interview last year and gim is particular abt decision making.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to optimist1983 For This Useful Post:
|
ShubhD (04-01-2009),
yudhajeet (04-01-2009)
|
|
Its Joka for me!!! finally .......
Hardcore PaGaL
Posts: 397
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Delhi
Age: 21
Groans: 3
Groaned at 60 Times in 12 Posts
Thanks: 119
Thanked 356 Times in 114 Posts
|
Re: XAT 2009: Jan 4th - The Overall Picture -
04-01-2009, 02:55 PM
Va was a shocker to me , Even RCs were tough
My attempts:
LR 13
QDI 17
VA 19
tOTAL 49
i KNOW AM ON A LOWER SIDE IN ATTEMPTS , BUT LETS WAIT AND WATCH
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ankit88kejriwal For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
Its Joka for me!!! finally .......
Hardcore PaGaL
Posts: 397
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Delhi
Age: 21
Groans: 3
Groaned at 60 Times in 12 Posts
Thanks: 119
Thanked 356 Times in 114 Posts
|
Re: XAT 2009: Jan 4th - The Overall Picture -
04-01-2009, 02:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimist1983
buddy he must have got low sectionals , and that section is most probable maths.xl is very particular abt maths percentile.i saw that in interview last year and gim is particular abt decision making.
|
Even i had reda that the overall cut offs were in the range of 35-36
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ankit88kejriwal For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
As a child....i always wanted 2 grow up.......but
now i realize....incomplete homework
Trainee PaGaL
Posts: 37
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hyderabad
Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 1 Post
Thanks: 4
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: XAT 2009: Jan 4th - The Overall Picture -
04-01-2009, 02:56 PM
Really Tough !!
I guess I am bowled Over..
Hope the cutoffs go low ..
My attempts :-
Logical - 08 
English - 16
Quant - 26
-------------
Overall - 50
-------------
Hope I clear Logical ...
|
|
|
|
|
has no status.
Trainee PaGaL
Posts: 40
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: delhi
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 5
Thanked 7 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: XAT 2009: Jan 4th - The Overall Picture -
04-01-2009, 02:57 PM
measly attempts ..
va - 14
qa/di - 14
lr/dm - 15
oa - 43
no chance
|
|
|
|
|
Finally hardwork paid, in SIBM now
Trainee PaGaL
Posts: 74
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: delhi
Groans: 6
Groaned at 12 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks: 96
Thanked 51 Times in 20 Posts
|
Re: XAT 2009: Jan 4th - The Overall Picture -
04-01-2009, 02:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by porcupine
hey does anyone have an idea as to what were the percentile cutoffs(each section) for XLRI BM last year?
|
visit last years thread..u will come to know in detail.
|
|
|
|
|
Need some luck!!
Trainee PaGaL
Posts: 79
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: chennai
Age: 24
Groans: 1
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 6
Thanked 14 Times in 9 Posts
|
Re: XAT 2009: Jan 4th - The Overall Picture -
04-01-2009, 03:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aditya_r
Really Tough !!
I guess I am bowled Over..
Hope the cutoffs go low ..
My attempts :-
Logical - 08
English - 16
Quant - 26
-------------
Overall - 50
-------------
Hope I clear Logical ... |
Ur attempts in QA is just awesome. But, logical keep ur fingers crossed!!
Thanks & Regards,
Sri
Memories are wonderful things, if you don't have to deal with the past
|
|
|
|
|
XLRI 2009-11
Expert PaGaL
Posts: 207
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: bhubaneswar
Age: 21
Groans: 16
Groaned at 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks: 116
Thanked 192 Times in 67 Posts
|
Re: XAT 2009: Jan 4th - The Overall Picture -
04-01-2009, 03:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ewbgaz
Are sectional cutoffs for PMIR lower? I might be just missing the BM cutoffs for ARDM. I had only applied for BM (like a moron). I am thinking of changing that to PMIR.
|
can u change it into PMIR? at this point of time?if yes,please tell me d procedure....
|
|
|
|
|
has no status.
Trainee PaGaL
Posts: 39
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: bombay
Age: 25
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 2
Thanked 46 Times in 11 Posts
|
Re: XAT 2009: Jan 4th - The Overall Picture -
04-01-2009, 03:02 PM
@dibaka: These are the ways people adopt to find cutoffs:
(1)Their own estimate, based on how they perceive the level of difficulty, combined with their perception of junta's capability. This method is obviously inaccurate.
(2)Method 1 combined with discussion with peers. Improved accuracy, but still, not accurate enough.
(3)Method 2, with added info from more students. This is the method used by coaching centers. This should be theoretically more accurate. However business priorities of the coaching center would drive the results away from what can be a half-decent representation of reality. Coaching centers may publish a number too low so that they can lure students into joining their GD/PI course.
It can also be the other way round. They may print cut offs that are too high to demoralize students from other coaching institute. Your average bloke may think that CL/Time/IMS publishing high cutoffs may mean that CL/IMS/TIME students perform better. That might make him want to join CL/IMS/Time next year.
Also, do not forget that all the 3 methods rely on receiving data from students. Do not forget that very few students are honest about their low attempts. Also, the ones who do really well tend to stay behind the iron curtain. They probably do this because they think that revealing their attempts may jinx their chances.
The only true source of info is all the OMRs and the criteria used by the institute. Both aren't accessible. Thus...patience.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to ewbgaz For This Useful Post:
|
anupam5138 (04-01-2009),
ashuu (09-01-2009),
datkilldme (04-01-2009),
dhirajbhagat (04-01-2009),
freakinbubu (05-01-2009),
gvi.shekar (05-01-2009),
ljv (04-01-2009),
logicalsid (04-01-2009),
megghzz (04-01-2009),
mexxian (04-01-2009),
RichiSaluja (06-01-2009),
sukhi (04-01-2009),
yudhajeet (04-01-2009)
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| |
Help
