|
| Other Exams - XAT, FMS, JMET, SNAP etc Institutes and exams other than the CAT can be discussed here. XAT, FMS, JMET, SNAP, NMAT, IBSAT etc. |
|
View Poll Results: WHAT SCORE ARE YOU EXPECTING IN SNAP 2008?
|
|
LESS THAN 65
|
   
|
345 |
22.89% |
|
65-70
|
  
|
256 |
16.99% |
|
70-75
|
  
|
199 |
13.21% |
|
75-80
|
  
|
230 |
15.26% |
|
80-85
|
  
|
215 |
14.27% |
|
85-90
|
  
|
106 |
7.03% |
|
90-95
|
|
73 |
4.84% |
|
95-100
|
|
35 |
2.32% |
|
100 +
|
|
48 |
3.19% |
|
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
Posts: 189
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bhopal
Age: 22
Groans: 32
Groaned at 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks: 143
Thanked 90 Times in 50 Posts
|
Re: [21 Dec 2008] SNAP 2008 : Paper Discussions,Analysis and More -
22-12-2008, 08:07 PM
Vimarsh Pratap
XLRI
School of Business and Human Resources
BM Batch of 2009-11
Last edited by vimarshpratap; 22-12-2008 at 08:48 PM.
Reason: Change of Link
|
|
|
|
|
has no status.
Newbie PaGaL
Posts: 6
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: chennai
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: [21 Dec 2008] SNAP 2008 : Paper Discussions,Analysis and More -
22-12-2008, 08:10 PM
hi frenz..!! my scores follows
acco to IMS key 6.75(GK)+10.75(ENGLISH)+24.5(QA)+41.5(LR) = 83.5
acco to CF key 5.50(GK)+7.50(ENGLISH)+24.5(QA)+44(LR) = 81.5
Xth = 80% (UP board)
XIIth = 69.4 (UP board)
B.TECH = 7.2/10
calls from wat all instis can i get...??
plz reply somebody.. i m bit worried coz of sectional cut offs...
|
|
|
|
|
finds it difficult to not see the pointlessness of
his last 2 years.
Hardcore PaGaL
Posts: 419
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: mumbai
Age: 23
Groans: 31
Groaned at 46 Times in 22 Posts
Thanks: 322
Thanked 592 Times in 199 Posts
|
Re: [21 Dec 2008] SNAP 2008 : Paper Discussions,Analysis and More -
22-12-2008, 08:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vimarshpratap
|
va keys of ptindia are ridiculous. i hope they have not made typing errors.
CAT 2008 - 99.68%ile Quant - 95.10, di - 96.42, va -99.49. Calls from L,I,K. missed C by 1 mark in Quant. IIM B only god knows  Missed IIM A due to 
GMAT 2008 - QA - 49 , VA - 40 Overall 720 
I rejected MDI
|
|
|
|
|
Life's unpredictability continues..
Expert PaGaL
Posts: 239
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mumbai
Groans: 95
Groaned at 37 Times in 30 Posts
Thanks: 424
Thanked 152 Times in 79 Posts
|
Re: [21 Dec 2008] SNAP 2008 : Paper Discussions,Analysis and More -
22-12-2008, 08:14 PM
An Analysis of SNAP ....
Well, its a well known fact now that SNAP 2008 was a little tough compared to last year.. But it cannot be termed very tough in any comparison to earlier snaps... The main driver for concluding this paper as tough were the introduction of 2 markers in all the sections ...
English - Easy .. difficulty level was similar to last years.. (20 - 25 mins, 30 + attempts were possible) cut offs - 14 - 16
LR - moderate .. a little tougher compared to last year.. (35 - 40 mins, 20 - 23 attempts were possible) cut offs - 25 - 28
QA - moderate ... slightly tougher compared to last year.. (30 - 35 mins, 25 attempts were possible) cut offs - 18 - 21
GK - Tough compared to last year with a lot of debatable questions.. (5-10 mins, 20 attempts were possible) cut offs - around 10
Overall -
SIBM pune - 85 + ( i would still go with this figure for many reasons..
1) though the paper was tougher compared to last year, the patern did not change a lot except the introduction of 2 markers.. which were again not that tough compared to the 1 markers.. i personally got all 5 2 marker right in QA and 4 rights in English.. So this would have proved to be a boon for those good in QA ..
2) competition for SNAP has increased many folds compared to last year.. also those who might have missed last year by a whisker might have tried their best in this paper..
3) last year cut-off was 85 for SIBM pune.. so guys giving the exam would have had this psychological number in their head while attempting and would have tried their best to surpass the figure ..
|
|
|
|
|
finds it difficult to not see the pointlessness of
his last 2 years.
Hardcore PaGaL
Posts: 419
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: mumbai
Age: 23
Groans: 31
Groaned at 46 Times in 22 Posts
Thanks: 322
Thanked 592 Times in 199 Posts
|
Re: [21 Dec 2008] SNAP 2008 : Paper Discussions,Analysis and More -
22-12-2008, 08:20 PM
Do not agree with your QA cutoff at all. If it was tougher than last year, how can the cutoff go up? i would term a section easy if i feel the cutoffs would go up. Last year QA cutoff was 13.75
Overall cannot be 85+ in my opinion. I will be very surprised even if it crosses 80.
IMS predictions are just about right for all sections. T.I.M.E predictions might just prove to be the most accurate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by anand_953
An Analysis of SNAP ....
Well, its a well known fact now that SNAP 2008 was a little tough compared to last year.. But it cannot be termed very tough in any comparison to earlier snaps... The main driver for concluding this paper as tough were the introduction of 2 markers in all the sections ...
English - Easy .. difficulty level was similar to last years.. (20 - 25 mins, 30 + attempts were possible) cut offs - 14 - 16
LR - moderate .. a little tougher compared to last year.. (35 - 40 mins, 20 - 23 attempts were possible) cut offs - 25 - 28
QA - moderate ... slightly tougher compared to last year.. (30 - 35 mins, 25 attempts were possible) cut offs - 18 - 21
GK - Tough compared to last year with a lot of debatable questions.. (5-10 mins, 20 attempts were possible) cut offs - around 10
Overall -
SIBM pune - 85 + ( i would still go with this figure for many reasons..
1) though the paper was tougher compared to last year, the patern did not change a lot except the introduction of 2 markers.. which were again not that tough compared to the 1 markers.. i personally got all 5 2 marker right in QA and 4 rights in English.. So this would have proved to be a boon for those good in QA ..
2) competition for SNAP has increased many folds compared to last year.. also those who might have missed last year by a whisker might have tried their best in this paper..
3) last year cut-off was 85 for SIBM pune.. so guys giving the exam would have had this psychological number in their head while attempting and would have tried their best to surpass the figure ..
|
CAT 2008 - 99.68%ile Quant - 95.10, di - 96.42, va -99.49. Calls from L,I,K. missed C by 1 mark in Quant. IIM B only god knows Missed IIM A due to
GMAT 2008 - QA - 49 , VA - 40 Overall 720
I rejected MDI
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ankit9doshi For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
has no status.
Newbie PaGaL
Posts: 12
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nasik
Age: 26
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: [21 Dec 2008] SNAP 2008 : Paper Discussions,Analysis and More -
22-12-2008, 08:21 PM
friends,
Sorry for posting my question again.
With 40-45 snap marks can i except call from SIMS
Xth - 80%
XIIth - 80%
Bsc - 65%
My father is an Ex army man.
Pls. clear my doubts PUYs ,i am in confusion....
|
|
|
|
|
comfort eagle
Expert PaGaL
Posts: 103
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Delhi
Age: 23
Groans: 3
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 32
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
Re: [21 Dec 2008] SNAP 2008 : Paper Discussions,Analysis and More -
22-12-2008, 08:27 PM
ims and career forum keys differ so much for english ?
i wonder which one is dependable??????? 
|
|
|
|
|
comfort eagle
Expert PaGaL
Posts: 103
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Delhi
Age: 23
Groans: 3
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 32
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
Re: [21 Dec 2008] SNAP 2008 : Paper Discussions,Analysis and More -
22-12-2008, 08:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucky2grt
friends,
Sorry for posting my question again.
With 40-45 snap marks can i except call from SIMS
Xth - 80%
XIIth - 80%
Bsc - 65%
My father is an Ex army man.
Pls. clear my doubts PUYs ,i am in confusion....
|
hey buddy chances are very less for getting a call bcoz according to CL even SIMS cutoffs are 65+
so just hope that you will get lucky,gear up for the next exam.:happy:
|
|
|
|
|
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
Posts: 189
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bhopal
Age: 22
Groans: 32
Groaned at 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks: 143
Thanked 90 Times in 50 Posts
|
Re: [21 Dec 2008] SNAP 2008 : Paper Discussions,Analysis and More -
22-12-2008, 08:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ankit9doshi
va keys of ptindia are ridiculous. i hope they have not made typing errors.
|
Maybe that was the problem..The link is not opening now..They might be uploading it again..
infact the link has changed..odd people
http://www.pteducation.com/admin/tes...swer%20Key.pdf
Vimarsh Pratap
XLRI
School of Business and Human Resources
BM Batch of 2009-11
Last edited by vimarshpratap; 22-12-2008 at 08:46 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
The Coolest One
Addicted PaGaL
IIFT 
Posts: 882
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: bangalore
Age: 24
Groans: 164
Groaned at 121 Times in 28 Posts
Thanks: 1,153
Thanked 1,597 Times in 497 Posts
|
Re: [21 Dec 2008] SNAP 2008 : Paper Discussions,Analysis and More -
22-12-2008, 08:51 PM
My score as per TIME
LR 29.50
GA 11.75
DI 21.50
EU 20.50
OA 83.25
Cheers
Sukrit
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
Mah-CET 2008 Paper Discussions
|
goelbhai |
MAT, state-level CET and related discussions |
252 |
13-01-2009 11:04 AM |
|
CAT 2008: Analysis, Experience, Discussions , & More
|
sarvshwet |
CAT and Related Discussion |
3157 |
08-01-2009 08:00 PM |
|
[20-Jan-08] DFS - MFC 2008: Paper Discussions
|
buck_was |
Other Exams - XAT, FMS, JMET, SNAP etc |
29 |
29-12-2008 04:28 PM |
|
[06-Jan-08] XAT 2008: Paper Discussions
|
buck_was |
Other Exams - XAT, FMS, JMET, SNAP etc |
1106 |
24-11-2008 04:43 PM |
|
[13-Jan-08] FMS 2008: Paper Discussions
|
buck_was |
Other Exams - XAT, FMS, JMET, SNAP etc |
1647 |
21-02-2008 10:21 AM |
| |
Help
