Quote:
Originally Posted by rsb1982
Blazer, strongly advised. R1 PGs reported an interview wherein the primary topic was why the dude didn't wear a coat. You wouldn't want to waste those valuable 20-30 mints talking about your sartorial sense now, would you ? Of course, you can justify the fact that wearing a shirt does not make you any less worthy of admission, but the question is - would you want to spend the interview time arguing about this pointless topic ?
|
suit is strongly advised. it oozes professionalism. you can talk about changing workplace, and steve jobs, and bill gates going to work in jeans, and all....but guess what? these ppl have already earned their stripes, we have yet to. oh sure, once u r in their shoes, u can go to work topless in boxers and it'll become a fad, u'll be a youth icon; but not till then. if among 12 candidates, i m in shirt & tie, that might differentiate me from others, but that's not the kind of negative differentiation i m looking for! believe me, when u r chatting up with other candidates awaiting ur turn, u can't help, but feel that, they look like business honchos and u look like a door-to-door salesman in shirt and tie. v expect professionalism from ISB, other B-schools, don't we? is it too much to pay them back in the same manner? they might be modest and say that dresscode doesn't matter, but shouldn't v at least
LOOK like business leaders before becoming ones? the last thing u want is thinking about defending ur no-suit-wear to the Adcom when u can use those invaluable minutes telling ur unique story to the adcom and convincing them of ur USP. (now, if u don't have a compelling, exciting story to tell, i guess u can skip the suit and then defend ur decision for a while to mask ur lack of USP...

)
p.s. i know Gandhiji is one of the greatest leaders of all, and yes, he did not wear a suit. but, then again, he had earned his stripes (he cud meet the Queens and Dukes of Europe clad in dhoti and chaddar and didn't look like a sorry Indian, but a proud Indian)! Can any one of us claim to be so? well then, that's that...
nigam - 690 - 7 yrs we - mfg operations
pgpx - admit
isb - admit
iimb - dinged
iiml - i/v call