Analyze "The Hindu" Editorial

[LalooPrasad]

Thanks rupstar ...

lets hope our comprehension skills will be polished ( with CHERRY BLOSSOM ) before CAT 2007 & IIM's wont be able to throw any surprise at us this time .

So lets analyse and ROCK.

[romymisra]

hey.
this is a very good idea.
I personally think the hindu is a really good newspaper and a must read for everyone wanting to prepare for cat... the editorial of the hindu is extremely substantial n informative.
lets start this as soon as possible.
romy

[ikruz]

hi friends,
todays's editorial - (13th june)

The Hindu : Opinion / Editorials : Putin and missile defence

pour in ur views and comments

[ideacrash]

Originally Posted by pradumn

hey dude
i completely agree with al u guys whos in favor of promotin this thread.......though i dont hv access to the hindu out here in kolkata but is plannin to read it on the net......
btw wat do u guys think abt the editorial of ECO TIMES....i find them really informative so how abt discussin n analysin the same together with hindu

neways i hope the thread continues .....forever
adios

hi , there is a separate thread solely meant for Eco edi , i think we can use that also ...

[Deepan_Kapadia]

Putin is great Diplomat...
According to the article Putin has now put the ball back in US court.
Now they have to decide what they plan to do.
It is a checkmate move.
If US accept the proposal then the data is shared between US and Russia which will not help US.
At the same time they cannot ascertain over the missiles owned by Russia especially in Serbia.
And if they don't accept the deal and set up a Radar on the broder it would give Russia the upper hand in claiming that it is planed against them and retrograde for the same.

[ikruz]

Originally Posted by Deepan_Kapadia

Putin is great Diplomat...
According to the article Putin has now put the ball back in US court.
Now they have to decide what they plan to do.
It is a checkmate move.
If US accept the proposal then the data is shared between US and Russia which will not help US.
At the same time they cannot ascertain over the missiles owned by Russia especially in Serbia.
And if they don't accept the deal and set up a Radar on the broder it would give Russia the upper hand in claiming that it is planed against them and retrograde for the same.

agree with Deepan,but feel he missed some points in the second paragraph which the author has put forward.putting across what i comprehended,please feel free to criticize-

Putin has rightly put the ball in US's court,and this will pause a dilemma for US.Putin's proposal has questioned US's intentions in puting missile defences near russian border. If US' intentions are genuine,then US shud infact accept Russia's proposal.This is why the proposal is very tricky and has taken US' aback.

Its very clear that US's intentions are not building a missile defense as it states,Its purpose is to establish its supremacy over Russia,since the latter has been coming up with excellent developments in missile strategies.Futhermore,Russia has also questioned the missile defence in the light of US-iran talks,saying the US proposal will effect the talk's outcome.

The editor concludes the article by saying that any form of missile defense is not a correct solution for keeping away attacks from a country.May be he wants to suggest that they should be settled amicably through talks or other peaceful means.

[ideacrash]

Originally Posted by ikruz

agree with Deepan,but feel he missed some points in the second paragraph which the author has put forward.putting across what i comprehended,please feel free to criticize-

Putin has rightly put the ball in US's court,and this will pause a dilemma for US.Putin's proposal has questioned US's intentions in puting missile defences near russian border. If US' intentions are genuine,then US shud infact accept Russia's proposal.This is why the proposal is very tricky and has taken US' aback.

Its very clear that US's intentions are not building a missile defense as it states,Its purpose is to establish its supremacy over Russia,since the latter has been coming up with excellent developments in missile strategies.Futhermore,Russia has also questioned the missile defence in the light of US-iran talks,saying the US proposal will effect the talk's outcome.

The editor concludes the article by saying that any form of missile defense is not a correct solution for keeping away attacks from a country.May be he wants to suggest that they should be settled amicably through talks or other peaceful means.

Good work guys,I would like putforth my version of the analysis :in the first para putin is trying to give a better solution for bush's problem with appropriate points which supports the Putn's Call , however BUsh seems to not consider it .@nd paraThe author feels bush is trying to gain the supremacy over russia and russia doesnot like it as they think they are equally strong if not better . China is also working towards increasing its strenght in the missile world.the author concludes , if bush thinks byu deploying missile defence it would end the warfare , however the author feels , something else would be invented which can beat the existing missile defence and the warfare would still continue. the best possible solution would be to talk and settle the matter rather spending lot of money in the defence which is not beneficial to any one and also the indian government sholud learn from the mistakes the others are doing in the missile defence and come up with a better plan.Please correct me if i have gone wrong in analysing the editorial .Wow !!! i have been reading paper ( TOI ) from long time but this is the first time i have written a summary . Hope its only gonna help me to get into IIM's s

[Deepan_Kapadia]

"China is also working towards increasing its strenght in the missile world.the author concludes , if bush thinks byu deploying missile defence it would end the warfare , however the author feels , something else would be invented which can beat the existing missile defence and the warfare would still continue. the best possible solution would be to talk and settle the matter rather spending lot of money in the defence which is not beneficial to any one and also the indian government sholud learn from the mistakes the others are doing in the missile defence and come up with a better plan"
In response to this i'd like to add if you think that by talks matters can be resolved then India and Pakistan have had many talks but nothing has yield.
On the other hand if v stop spending on Defence thinking matters are resolved we would be in for a great shock when they go out of hand.
So i think continuous spending will always be there so that the missiles are avaliable for display and if things go out of hand then use them.

[ideacrash]

Originally Posted by Deepan_Kapadia

"China is also working towards increasing its strenght in the missile world.the author concludes , if bush thinks byu deploying missile defence it would end the warfare , however the author feels , something else would be invented which can beat the existing missile defence and the warfare would still continue. the best possible solution would be to talk and settle the matter rather spending lot of money in the defence which is not beneficial to any one and also the indian government sholud learn from the mistakes the others are doing in the missile defence and come up with a better plan"
In response to this i'd like to add if you think that by talks matters can be resolved then India and Pakistan have had many talks but nothing has yield.
On the other hand if v stop spending on Defence thinking matters are resolved we would be in for a great shock when they go out of hand.
So i think continuous spending will always be there so that the missiles are avaliable for display and if things go out of hand then use them.

if i am not wrong i think u are giving ur opinion dude, i had just summarized what the author feels, and to crack the cat , we should analyse what the author feels not what we feel .....

do correct me if i am wrong .

[Deepan_Kapadia]

Originally Posted by ideacrash

if i am not wrong i think u are giving ur opinion dude, i had just summarized what the author feels, and to crack the cat , we should analyse what the author feels not what we feel .....

do correct me if i am wrong .

No sir u not s wrong and yes i did add my personal opinion to it..