Higher education needs a better deal
- 28th January, 2009
The tone is critical, unfavouring the current govt. way of dealing with higher education in India. The style is analytical, critical, suggestive.
The passage deals with the state of higher education in India. The author's main focus in deriving this is to hinge on the latest speech by Manmohan Singh at Indian Science Congress (ISC) and some of the actions by the government in the recent past. The passage also suggests some ways in which higher education could be bettered.
Primarily these are the things that the author mentions (flow of the passage)-
1) First he criticizes the current government's way of dealing with higher education and research.
2) Wants a university or College department to have better staffing and better pay scales.
3) Next he blames UGC for granting too many "Deemed University" status. All the way accusing that this only leads to a dilution of quality (although supply- side constraints are lax).
4) Next he suggested a remedial action - to setup a panel (with top academicians) to review higher educational institutions that have been accorded deemed university status in the last 5 years.
5) Next he states the promises made by Manmohan Singh to the ISC and compares it to what's needed and declares them inadequate.
6) He brings out the bad state (or way of dealings) with higher education by mentioning the pay hikes in Defense departments and in DRDO the money showered recently.
7) Finally ends on a note of distress and ends on a grave note that if not dealt with could lead to further problems.