[quote=drgrudge;1249531]dazed, thanks for the exercise. It would be great if we get nice and juicy FIJs in the CAT '08. The more, the merrier.
@ Drgrudge - u got 9 on 10 correct

- so we know, whom to approach in case som1 has doubts, good show and dont worry - i hope cat ones also will be a cake walk for u. try solving the ones that Anirudh posts - his ones I think are at par with CAT.
Sorry puyz, got caught up in one of the caselets, the old horses are being seen lesser and lesser, pooja, varun et al, but good to see, siddharth!

Great thread Sid!
Ok Guyz, here are the ans :
1. J [since the statement is not verifiable and also contains a lot of subjective generalisation,so it’s a judgement]
2. F[its verifiable and is fully objective, hence a fact]
3. F[we can verify about the product thus the statement is a fact]
4. F[again the statement is verifiable from the person, so is a fact]
5. I [a conclusion about something based on a known factor,thus the statement is an inference]
6. J [it is a generalised statement and mind not hold true for all cases, thus is a judgement]
7. F [verifiable,whether julian was doing it or not, thus is a fact]
8. J [who is the I? not verifiable and also glorification of the subject I, thus will fall in the category of judgement]
9. I [a conclusion based on a fact, therefore an inference]
10. I [the govt. did something which will result in something, thus an inference or a conclusion based on certain facts]
today loads of questions already - two sets posted by Anirudh and 1 more set by rk. Lets get going!!!