Quote:
Originally Posted by warrior
Just a simple obsevation ( about this thread and other threads started by pupil corcerning that law) but can answer many questions.
People have come out both in support and against the law.
Its evident that gals (somuya, candy etc) support the law while guys (myself mahesh and pupil only) are against it.
But some of the men (erudite, apurv ,oxy, urmad and lots more) has come out in support of gals. But other way round is not true. No girl seems to be opposing the law.
Now don't tell me that this law dosen't have any flaw in it. Girls also might me knowing that but still no one has pointed that out. Even many men have thanked girls for their posts but no girls seems have done that.What we got are just only groans from them. Now may be some of the posts are bad but do u think all our posts are so bad. All points may not be apt but some are quite good and genuine concerns. Even in those posts we are awarded with groans.
Now if ours is a male dominated society than u can easily see the reason Why? It seems that male has a braoder perspective and greater empathy for both male and females and so they are rightly accorded the responsibility to run the family and society. Girls seems to be lacking here. They seems to be corcened about themselves.
Same goes with the corporate scenario. Person who is able to empathize is promoted over others ( no matter how skillful the other is), Same goes over here. Beacuse our decision are based on more rational facts male are allowed to run the society.
And its always better to have a lead who has corcerns for all not just for himself. And its no hidden facts that by nature womens are more canny and selfish. that what Ekta kapoor is showing all throughout his daily TV serials. (I have heard of Kyu ki saas bhi kabhi bahu thi but never heard of kyun ki sasur bhi kabhi damaad tha).
Now its up to you whom do you want in a lead position. :wink:
|
Okay so I was groaned by candy and Soumya for this post too.
Previously I added a line " Now let me see how many groans I get for this post" but later decided to remove it. I wasn't expecting graons for atleast this post.
Now there is nothing I have written in this post which one can groan on. I have just presented a simple analysis about what I have observed on 2-3 threads . And that is true. No tweaking of results not exaggerating anything.
Now pupil have thanked me but also quoted my post in his later posts and posted the reasons for the same. But I think soumya and candy seems to think otherwise. They have groaned but didn't quoted my posted to give the reason as to why they oppose by views. Either they have graoned just seeing my post without actually going through and understanding what I am trying to say or they are just too arrogant to listen to others point of view.
Now whatever be the case this shows their casual attitude towards other. They just don't want to listen to other and are only interested in their points. They even groaned at the post the which has only analysis of the earlier posts.
Now this what happens in most households. Women just don't listen and dosen't agree even on logical points. The only think they do is just shout and shout to put forward their point. and thats something a sort of mental torture which is more painful and damaging than the physical torture (which this law is talking about). Now to vent out their frustation and anger (to made them understand their logical point) if male resorts to violent means its always considered as male fault. No one ever tries and dig further for the actual cause.
Actually Ek haath se talli nahin Bajti ( I don't know the english verse for this) but most of the time male are considered at fault for the failure of marriage or for all ills against them. Why so?
Also if women think that men are their biggest foes then again they are mistaking. They are their biggest foes. See around (and also in all TV shows) you will find out who tortures whom the most. In most of the dowry cases it "saas" who is convicted.
Help
??:
Linear Mode
