Look dude... don't mind but there's no point arguing like this when u cant think outside the box.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by princeparas Thats what i m saying. They have banned few websites only. They have not banned all blogsites. They banned only those websites in which they found somwehing wrong. |
ok, fine. Tomorrow, the terrorists use some other blogs.... then they would ban those. But does this provide a solution. U know there are ways to bypass the ban... Even the terrorists know this. So in a way, the ban isn't effective. Hence, is there any meaning in banning like this?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by princeparas Wrong Arguement. Have they banned acces on internet ? no.
Have they banned telephones ? no.
Have they banned All blog sites ? no.
Thats what they did. they found out few websites & banned them. & we people are making noise on it. |
The point is not that they have banned.... but the way they've implemented. Since their are numerous loopholes, the ban is totally meaningless... Secondly, this will in NO way cease or even decrease the terrorist activites.
p.s. the terrorists have a plethora of means to communicate and the only way to counter it is by development of our intelligence sources.