[kushalc]

This has probably been one of the most controversial topics in the history of this planet. Did he actually land on the moon?

Experts over the year have come up with numerous examples and anomalies in the photographs to prove that he didn't. That all he did was jump around in a NASA lab and made a fool of himself in the process.

NASA and the US have of course vehemently denied it all these years.

I'll briefly list down some of the errors in the pics that have been noticed.

1. The flapping flag. No air on the moon. How could if flap?
2. The famed footprint. Considering the feeble gravitational pull on the moon, a footprint would be almost impossible. Unless they'd taken an elephant along.
3. The absence of a crator beneath the Lunar Vehicle.
4. The difference in the size of the two men's (Armstrong & Aldrin) shadows.

There're of course other points worth discussing, but we can go into them as the thread progresses. (If it does!!!!)

What's your take on it?

[Aditya_123]

There's an excellent documentary titled as "Moon Landing Hoax" which covers all the above points and many more. However, NASA has given befitting counter arguements to each point of accusation. For a complete list check out

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_...ax_accusations

[varunsal]

I think so "Did they really landed on moon" is a diff one which reveals all these facts.....
It was released by russians I thnk.....

[ummang777]

Originally Posted by kushalc

This has probably been one of the most controversial topics in the history of this planet. Did he actually land on the moon?

Experts over the year have come up with numerous examples and anomalies in the photographs to prove that he didn't. That all he did was jump around in a NASA lab and made a fool of himself in the process.

NASA and the US have of course vehemently denied it all these years.

I'll briefly list down some of the errors in the pics that have been noticed.

1. The flapping flag. No air on the moon. How could if flap?
2. The famed footprint. Considering the feeble gravitational pull on the moon, a footprint would be almost impossible. Unless they'd taken an elephant along.
3. The absence of a crator beneath the Lunar Vehicle.
4. The difference in the size of the two men's (Armstrong & Aldrin) shadows.

There're of course other points worth discussing, but we can go into them as the thread progresses. (If it does!!!!)

What's your take on it?

Wel i think that Americans have blurred this whole NASA episode and it was nothing like Neil Armstrong was sent on moon...the pics very clearly shows it and stands for evidence ..wel its wat i think because Americans have sort out these issues also...
Wel after all its SUPER POWER!!!!!!

[poindexter]

kya farak padta hai?

[serialkisser]

Originally Posted by kushalc

This has probably been one of the most controversial topics in the history of this planet. Did he actually land on the moon?

Experts over the year have come up with numerous examples and anomalies in the photographs to prove that he didn't. That all he did was jump around in a NASA lab and made a fool of himself in the process.

NASA and the US have of course vehemently denied it all these years.

I'll briefly list down some of the errors in the pics that have been noticed.

1. The flapping flag. No air on the moon. How could if flap?
2. The famed footprint. Considering the feeble gravitational pull on the moon, a footprint would be almost impossible. Unless they'd taken an elephant along.
3. The absence of a crator beneath the Lunar Vehicle.
4. The difference in the size of the two men's (Armstrong & Aldrin) shadows.

There're of course other points worth discussing, but we can go into them as the thread progresses. (If it does!!!!)

What's your take on it?

ya as far as evidences go i don thnk they landed on moon. 1 mor thng is tht had it been reality thn for sure russians wud hav done tht,cz at tht time russians n americans were goin neck to neck in space exploration.

[LIFE HEDGER]

if george bush can have secret prisons for convicts (all over ....romania ...parst of inside africa...middle east)...........................
in todays transparent age of accessibility n information..?
then back then nasa which is integral part of america....could have done anything...

u see AMERICAN HEGEMONY.... it was .. it is .... n unfortunately will be.....
wether..they got or mot .....is not imp rite now....

moon has water.... he landed no russia did.... mars has this that .. wat bot 10000000 million dollars year after year.... go hell with this 3 trillion dollars debt !!!!!!!thats how much america is faking this world supremacy

this earth is centuries away from being perfect....n we wanted ,want ..n will...to go there where....there is no need .....................

man has no right to interfare with nature n because its a loosing cause...

earth pe to logon ko pani oxygen...milta nahin ...we all want NASA to achieve these stupid accomplishment...

only america can do this ........!!!
i know i may have deviated ,..... BUT I DON'T LIKE THIS LOOKING BACK THING ..................

AMERICA DOES THINGS WITHOUT GENUINE NEED N REASON ...
......
even the penguins in arctic circle 9 that !!!n more about america !!!!!u heard it rite..penguins even the polar bears!!!!!!!!!!!!!!lol

[kushalc]

Originally Posted by LIFE HEDGER

if george bush can have secret prisons for convicts (all over ....romania ...parst of inside africa...middle east)...........................
in todays transparent age of accessibility n information..?
then back then nasa which is integral part of america....could have done anything...

u see AMERICAN HEGEMONY.... it was .. it is .... n unfortunately will be.....
wether..they got or mot .....is not imp rite now....

moon has water.... he landed no russia did.... mars has this that .. wat bot 10000000 million dollars year after year.... go hell with this 3 trillion dollars debt !!!!!!!thats how much america is faking this world supremacy

this earth is centuries away from being perfect....n we wanted ,want ..n will...to go there where....there is no need .....................

man has no right to interfare with nature n because its a loosing cause...

earth pe to logon ko pani oxygen...milta nahin ...we all want NASA to achieve these stupid accomplishment...

only america can do this ........!!!
i know i may have deviated ,..... BUT I DON'T LIKE THIS LOOKING BACK THING ..................

AMERICA DOES THINGS WITHOUT GENUINE NEED N REASON ...
......
even the penguins in arctic circle 9 that !!!n more about america !!!!!u heard it rite..penguins even the polar bears!!!!!!!!!!!!!!lol

Well now...here's one Uncle Sam basher for sure!

I do agree that there're more pressing needs to be fulfilled on this planet than, maybe finding water on other celestial bodies, or finding other celestial bodies, for that matter...but then, everything has its need and importance.

In a similar vein, you could probably argue that we shouldn't be pumping so much money into sports and world cups and such other stuff. The world doesn't actually need those either, does it?

We cannot blame poverty and the lack of food/clothing of millions of people to the projects done by the US and NASA, can we? Because, that then, defeats the entire purpose and meaning of progress.

Yes, the NASA has been accused of a hoax. But then, who were the ones to initiate it? The Russians...and we all know to what lengths each side went in those Cold War years!
And I'd suggest all of you to have a look at the link that has been suggested in msg no. 2 of this thread. At least read out what NASA had to say in defence!