Quote:
|
Originally Posted by numinousdivine i sincerely feel that humanities students are better equipped to be managers....their understanding of human life is augmented by their readings in subjects like psychology...philosophy..thought...etc.history i feel is a case study on a largest canvas possible!! if u look at leaders ...a common thread that runs through them all is their voracious reading habits.i am yet to meet a serious humanities student who is not an excellent communicator and jugde of human mind.in course of our studies we know constitution..law...whos who of politics... socioal trends and wat not. |
Yaar, seriously, I think you are underestimating engineers by delineating these qualities within the domain of pure humanities. Of course you never said explicitly that people from technical fields lack these qualities, but the post did have those connotations. The only reason I can think of is that the IIM selection team, probably based on past records, feels that though humanities students do have the qualities mentioned above, they just might lack in other qualities like analytical skills and ease in handling numbers, which are also required to do well in an IIM course, and in jobs after that. When they select engineers, or science and commerce students, they can rest assured to a fair degree that these students have a basic prowess in the mathematical aspects, and the ones among these who do well at other criteria (which is tested in the GD and interview) are taken in.
This is one theory that I can think of. I am not condoning or justifying the lack of humanities students in the short-list. In fact, even I do believe that having students from varying backgrounds would be a lot more interesting in the class, and if there is any conscious attempt by IIMs to not take in humanities students it throws all the talk about having diversity down in the pits.