hi there,
interesting discussion going on here. my 2 cents :
i'm a below average student when it comes to acads.
completed my BE in comp sc this yr with 68%.
X : 78% [CBSE]
XII : 63% [CBSE]
got 88.44 %ile in CAT'03(feb) and 76.13%ile ( yeah
u read that right ! ) in CAT'04
but i still maintain that CAT is not bakwaas but perhaps
the
ONLY exam that truly tests ur aptitude.
my frnds here who were the 1st n 2nd topper
of our univ got 0.91%ile and 23 %ile respectively.........!!!
that goes to show that something is terribly wrong with
the way our univ. system ( edu. system rather ) works
and not the way CAT works! n one of my best frnds
who is currently working with Cognizant ( 85+%
in X n XII - CBSE n 81% in BE ) got 33%ile in CAT
while he had been preparing for the last 2 years !
N dun tell me that this time they got such %iles cuz the pattern
changed cuz the same ppl got single digit %iles last time
too.
and yes, do u think CAT shud b conducted on
the lines of GRE n GMAT ? no way! i hope u must b kidding ! any n every1can get a 1600/1600 in GRE n 800 in GMAT. n 4get
abt the esaays n SOP - v all know where ppl get them
drafted frm , don't v? i wud've agreed 2 u 12345 had u said
that XAT n SNAP pattern must b changed cuz in XAT
all u gotta do is barron's, p&c, probability n manorama
yrbook n 4 SNAP gk just PCM with bio, history n God
knows what!!
that is wut i feel. counter-arguments r welcome but
plz give rational points only
regards,
aparna