Quote:
|
Originally Posted by coolsurfer23in @ Sat Nov 27, 2004 3:30 pm hey guys..
yep i wud agree with all of u.IIM is nt the end of the world and *defiently not a parameter to judge ur intelligence or your competency..i strongly beielive that the slection process is academic oriented...
guys im sayin this for myself..though i knew i was intelligent and smart etc etc but i never got into books...and to add to it did major mistakes in my life due to which for a long long time didnt feel nice abt myself....but then i worked my way and figured out things but then even if had got a awesome percntile the IIM's and ilks wudnt even bother to take me in coz of my past acads..i dnt say that acads dnt play a role but then just coz someone did nething wrong..shud he get the punishment for his whole life..wat kind of justice is this...those with bad acads in the past but then they decided to change thier lives shudnt be given any chance?? are not worthy of becoming managers???
hey sorry guys i know i have gone off track but then cudnt help it...nt in a good mood today |
If you were to choose 1350 candidates out of one and half lakh aspirants what would you do? *Think about this for sometime and you will realize the enormity of the task. *What should be the academic background, academic scores, CAT score, work experience, communications skills in GD-PI - phew!! at the end of it, the organizers of the test will no wonder be glad that its all over. *After all these, I am sure the organizers won't be having the time or the patience to go through the life stories of each aspirant *

however compelling it might be. *It is just that, since they have only 1350 odd seats they have to have certain (high) standards so that they have good aspirants. *More than a lakh of aspirants will be rejected - it does'nt mean IIMs have a secret agenda for/grievance against each of the rejected aspirant.
As far as academic performance is concerned there are two lines of thought, which they look at even during placements - the first line is that a person with good academic performance will deliver exceptional performance as a manager as well. *The second line of thinking is that the brilliant academic performers usually have poor social skills and hence would be bad managers - a person practising the second ideology would actually hire a person with poor/okay academic records. *I am sure that each line of thought has its own merits/demerits.
The point is don't cry over your past, give all the tests, CAT, XAT, GMAT....you will find your mentor/alma mater at the appropriate time. *And if you have it, you will be a manager, be there an alma mater or not. ...sheeesh, I am beginning to sound like Oprah Winfrey *

.
-pooran