The PG Dream Team '08!!! - Page 18 - PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA in India and Abroad, CAT 2009, GMAT, XAT, MAT
PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA in India and Abroad, CAT 2009, GMAT, XAT, MAT
Forum Rules
» Sponsors
  PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA in India and Abroad, CAT 2009, GMAT, XAT, MAT > MBA Exams and Institutes - Indian Business Schools > CAT and Related Discussion
The PG Dream Team '08!!!
CAT and Related Discussion Discuss information and B-schools under the toughest and most exclusive management entrance exam in India. The CAT - The Common Admission Test.

Tags: ,

» Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#171)
sbahadur86 sbahadur86 is offline
has no status.
Hardcore PaGaL
FMS Delhi

 
sbahadur86's Avatar
 
Posts: 376
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Delhi
Age: 23
Groans: 21
Groaned at 9 Times in 8 Posts
Thanks: 341
Thanked 1,344 Times in 240 Posts
Re: The PG Dream Team '08!!! - 06-10-2008, 09:58 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Varun Khullar View Post
Word Usage

1.If/Whether
Whether is correct when you're discussing two options (whether to get chocolate or strawberry ice cream) and if is correct for more than two options (if she should get ice cream, frozen yogurt, or a cookie).
On the CAT, whether will (almost) always beat if
Incorrect: Her client didn't tell her if he had sent his payment yet.
Correct: Her client didn't tell her whether he had sent his payment yet
Hi, Gr8 effort Varun, cheers!

I have a couple of doubts..
Correct: Her client didn't tell her whether he had sent his payment yet
The above statement is correct, I agree...Could you tell me whether (no pun intended :P) the statement below is also correct.....

Her client didn't tell her whether or not he had sent his payment yet.

Also, if you could clarify the difference between the usage of who and whom, i wud be grateful....have been struggling with that usage for ages...

Thanx

Sushant
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
» Quote
Sponsored Links
  (#172)
slam slam is offline
is battling for life
Hardcore PaGaL
IIM Ahmedabad

 
Posts: 555
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ahmedabad
Groans: 8
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 694
Thanked 428 Times in 198 Posts
Re: The PG Dream Team '08!!! - 06-10-2008, 10:41 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by sbahadur86 View Post
Hi, Gr8 effort Varun, cheers!

I have a couple of doubts..
Correct: Her client didn't tell her whether he had sent his payment yet
The above statement is correct, I agree...Could you tell me whether (no pun intended :P) the statement below is also correct.....

Her client didn't tell her whether or not he had sent his payment yet.

Also, if you could clarify the difference between the usage of who and whom, i wud be grateful....have been struggling with that usage for ages...

Thanx

Sushant
I've been following the DT Thread for quite a while now, and it's about time I started contributing as well. Here are some clarifications on the Who Vs. Whom dilemma that most of of us face (I picked this up from somewhere long back, will post the link as well, if I happen to find it):

Which of these sentences are correct?

1. We will give the money to the person who needs it most.
2. We filed a complaint against the contractor who we hired last month.
3. No one knows who you are.
4. Who are you calling?
5. Who is at the door?
6. We will be kind to whomever knocks on our door for help.
7. Whomever we elect for president will be in office for four years.

All the odd numbered sentences are correct.

Before we go over the four-step trick for getting "who" and "whom" right every time, let's look at the grammatical difference between these words, keeping in mind that "whoever" and "whomever" function just as "who" and "whom" do. (All grammarphobes please skip right on down to the trick!)

"Who" and "whoever" will always be either the subject or the predicate pronoun of their own clauses. (A subject and a verb comprise a clause.) Thus, in sentence 1, "who needs it most" is correct because "who" is the subject of the verb "needs." In sentence 3, "who" is the predicate pronoun of the clause "who you are." (Because of the linking verb "are," the clause says "you = who.") Sentence 5 is correct because "who" is the subject of the verb "is."

"Whom" and "whomever" will always serve as objects. Sentence 2 is incorrect because in the clause "who we hired last month," the subject is "we," the verb is "hired," and the object of that verb is "whom." Likewise, in sentence 4, the subject is "you" and the object of the verb "are calling" is "whom." In normal order, the clause reads "we are calling whom." Here are corrected versions of sentences 2 and 4:

2. We filed a complaint against the contractor whom we hired last month.
4. Whom are you calling?

Sentence 7 correctly employs "whomever" as the object of its own clause, "Whomever we elect for president." The subject is "we," the verb is "elect," and the direct object is "whomever." In normal order, the clause reads "we elect whom."

Here is the four-step trick for getting these words straight every time:

Step 1: Isolate the clause containing the "who(ever)" or "whom(ever)." (Sentences that ask questions, such ase 4 and 5 above, can have only one clause.)

Step 2: Ignore the part of the sentence that is NOT in the "who(ever)" or "whom(ever)" clause.

Step 3: In place of the word "who(ever)" or "whom(ever)," plug in the words "he" or "him" and see which one sounds better. (Sorry, ladies; we can't use "she" and "her" because "her" doesn't end with an "m," and the trick won't work!)

Step 4: If "he" sounds better, then choose "who(ever)." If "him" sounds better, then choose "whom(ever)." Remember that the "m" words ("him" and "whom") go together.

Let's try the trick on sentence 1:

(1) Isolate the "who/whom" clause: We will give the money to the person [who needs it most].

(2) Ignore the rest of the sentence outside the bracketed clause.

(3) Plug in "he" or "him" and see which sounds better: "he needs it most" or "him needs it most"?

(4) Obviously, "he" sounds better, so our choice will be "who."

Let's try it on sentence 7:

(1) Isolate the "whoever/whomever" clause: [Whomever we elect for president] will be in office for four years.

(2) Ignore the rest of the sentence outside the bracketed clause.

(3) Plug in "he" or "him" and see which sounds better: "we elect he for president" or "we elect him for president"?

(4) Obviously, "him" sounds better, so our choice will be "whom"--or, in this sentence, "whomever."

The trick works even when the "who" or "whom" refers to a group of people; simply use "they" and "them" instead of "he" and "him." The "m" words still go together: "them," "him," "whom," and "whomever."

We get in trouble when we forget step 2 of the trick and don't ignore the part of the sentence that is outside the "who/whom" clause. Notice what would have happened if we had made that mistake with sentence 6 and said "we will be kind to him" instead of "he knocks on our door for help." We would have incorrectly chosen "whomever" instead of "whoever."


-slam.

It ain't just a daydream if you decide to make it your life.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
» Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to slam For This Useful Post:
Go_GettIt (07-10-2008), implex (06-10-2008), ljv (06-10-2008), medulla (06-10-2008), mirage101 (08-10-2008), piku008 (07-10-2008), prakhar1989 (01-06-2010), rik_12 (06-10-2008), sbahadur86 (06-10-2008), selebratinglife (06-10-2008), tanuthegreatest (06-10-2008), v-factor (06-10-2008), Varun Khullar (06-10-2008), visionIIM-ACL (30-10-2009)
  (#173)
Varun Khullar Varun Khullar is offline
has no status.
Addicted PaGaL
 
Varun Khullar's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,144
Join Date: Mar 2004
Age: 26
Groans: 7
Groaned at 6 Times in 5 Posts
Thanks: 456
Thanked 627 Times in 270 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Varun Khullar Send a message via Yahoo to Varun Khullar
Re: The PG Dream Team '08!!! - 06-10-2008, 02:59 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by sbahadur86 View Post
Hi, Gr8 effort Varun, cheers!

I have a couple of doubts..
Correct: Her client didn't tell her whether he had sent his payment yet
The above statement is correct, I agree...Could you tell me whether (no pun intended :P) the statement below is also correct.....

Her client didn't tell her whether or not he had sent his payment yet.

Also, if you could clarify the difference between the usage of who and whom, i wud be grateful....have been struggling with that usage for ages...

Thanx

Sushant

well the idea would be to check whether we need it.
"whether or not"
or not basically points to the negative alternative.
if a simple alternative exists we ignore whether or not and use whether.

Her client didn't tell her whether or not he had sent his payment yet.
vs
Her client didn't tell her whether he had sent his payment yet.

i think whether or not contributes to the sentence hence the usage is fine.
its a case by case thing.This

Whether or not literature is available on computer, readers are likely to continue to cherish books.
now in this we needn't use whether or not just a simple whether would suffice
eg :
What the government decides to do depends on whether or not the bill passes.

now here to the negative alternative is not needed so whether would again be sufficient.
eg:
Whether or not Canadians agree, tax revenues must increase.
now we need emphasis on both alternatives.
so whether is better than whether or not.

Whether or not you drive or take the bus, the trip will take 30 minutes.
(Clearly wrong, as "or not" cannot apply to the other alternative, which is both positive and explicitly stated.)
also try the link below
Language Corner: Whether (or not)


My LR VA Blog
http://pagalbille.blogspot.com/
BBBT 08 Member
India United Dream Team
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
» Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Varun Khullar For This Useful Post:
exile (07-10-2008), implex (06-10-2008), rik_12 (06-10-2008), sbahadur86 (06-10-2008)
  (#174)
dawn153 dawn153 is offline
has no status.
Newbie PaGaL
 
Posts: 28
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 23
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 17
Thanked 103 Times in 20 Posts
Re: The PG Dream Team '08!!! - 06-10-2008, 04:08 PM

Guys , I think i should withdraw from here, as I am not very comfortable with discussing things on the net or as a matter of fact grasping anything which is being poured out by a computer monitor. So, try as I might , I am not able to participate in the discussions.
So you people are free to choose any replacement you like.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
» Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dawn153 For This Useful Post:
implex (06-10-2008), maverick_srikan (13-10-2008), monsterkartik (06-10-2008)
  (#175)
karanmaroo karanmaroo is offline
There is so much to do!
Hardcore PaGaL
IIM Indore

 
karanmaroo's Avatar
 
Posts: 439
Join Date: Aug 2007
Age: 24
Groans: 73
Groaned at 8 Times in 5 Posts
Thanks: 1,888
Thanked 1,182 Times in 277 Posts
Re: The PG Dream Team '08!!! - 07-10-2008, 08:28 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by dawn153 View Post
Guys , I think i should withdraw from here, as I am not very comfortable with discussing things on the net or as a matter of fact grasping anything which is being poured out by a computer monitor. So, try as I might , I am not able to participate in the discussions.
So you people are free to choose any replacement you like.
Relax bro. DT is not just about discussing acads.. Its also about discussing preperations, about discussing strategies- and being there for each other when the chips are down. So there is no reason for us to let go of you
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
» Quote
  (#176)
karanmaroo karanmaroo is offline
There is so much to do!
Hardcore PaGaL
IIM Indore

 
karanmaroo's Avatar
 
Posts: 439
Join Date: Aug 2007
Age: 24
Groans: 73
Groaned at 8 Times in 5 Posts
Thanks: 1,888
Thanked 1,182 Times in 277 Posts
Re: The PG Dream Team '08!!! - 07-10-2008, 08:29 AM

Posting this from the AIMCAT 905 thread:

I have a few doubts.

1) Q 57- Why can't the answer be option 1/2? THe author clearly mentions that despite.. science can be out of touch with the needs, goals and aspirations ..

2) Q 66- Why is option 1 eliminated?

3) Q 73- Option 2 looks equally possible to me.. Am I missing something?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
» Quote
  (#177)
ljv ljv is offline
Thank you, Superman !!!
Hardcore PaGaL
 
ljv's Avatar
 
Posts: 474
Join Date: Jun 2008
Age: 26
Groans: 0
Groaned at 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks: 2,396
Thanked 1,012 Times in 293 Posts
Re: The PG Dream Team '08!!! - 07-10-2008, 10:35 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by karanmaroo View Post
Posting this from the AIMCAT 905 thread:

I have a few doubts.

1) Q 57- Why can't the answer be option 1/2? THe author clearly mentions that despite.. science can be out of touch with the needs, goals and aspirations ..

2) Q 66- Why is option 1 eliminated?

3) Q 73- Option 2 looks equally possible to me.. Am I missing something?
Q 57) I agree with you completely. I marked option (2) and stand by it. The last line states that "science can to easily be out of touch ...". Saying that it impedes social development as in option (3) is not even remotely implied anywhere in the passage. Option (1) is eliminated coz inimical implies hostility, and malicious intent is not referred to in the passage. I understood counter productive to be synonymous with non-conducive and marked option (2).

Q 66) See para 2, line 5. It says that, "most book reviewers want to be real writers."

Q 67) Option (2) and (4) are very close, for both get mentioned in the passage. But if you see last page, it says that, "..they will have a tendency to bargain to maximise their own advantage. For this reason, ..." Words in bold were a good enough reason for me to mark option(4).


Not only am I not learning, I'm forgetting stuff I used to know
----------------------------------------------
My Mock Scores | IIM Lucknow 2009-2011
IIML GD/PI Call getters
Register here
http://synapse.iiml.ac.in/ignicion
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
» Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ljv For This Useful Post:
karanmaroo (07-10-2008), rik_12 (07-10-2008)
  (#178)
karanmaroo karanmaroo is offline
There is so much to do!
Hardcore PaGaL
IIM Indore

 
karanmaroo's Avatar
 
Posts: 439
Join Date: Aug 2007
Age: 24
Groans: 73
Groaned at 8 Times in 5 Posts
Thanks: 1,888
Thanked 1,182 Times in 277 Posts
Re: The PG Dream Team '08!!! - 08-10-2008, 06:20 AM

The aimcat results are out. My results:

qa - 97.05 (45)
di - 99.71 (63)
va - 86.9 (27)

oa - 99.58 (135)

air: 144

@ Aditya.. Do we have a repository of everyone's scores?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
» Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to karanmaroo For This Useful Post:
exile (08-10-2008), iceman3 (08-10-2008), implex (08-10-2008), selebratinglife (08-10-2008)
  (#179)
dheeraj138 dheeraj138 is offline
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
IIM Ahmedabad

 
Posts: 132
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ahmedabad
Age: 25
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 157
Thanked 558 Times in 70 Posts
Re: The PG Dream Team '08!!! - 08-10-2008, 08:40 AM

The scores are out.

QA - 53 (99.25 %ile)
VA - 35 (95.39 %ile)
DI - 78 (99.98 %ile)

OA - 166 (99.98 %ile)

AIR - 8
CR - 2

Satisfied with the overall score but very disappointed with VA. A 95.39 in a section takes things out of your hands and I don't want that to happen. I want to be comfortable when I think about the cutoffs, not lose sleep hoping that my score will somehow just fall above it.

And QA deserved more than the two stupid mistakes I made. I bungled up the cuboid costs prob!! Same with DI. It deserved more. Hope atleast this spurs me on to study calendar-based stuff (the no. of sundays, saturdays etc..). Still a bit disgruntled because the way I see it, there were 14 more marks (two silly mistakes and the unattempted calendar ques) there for the taking and an AIR of 7 in that section shouldn't mask the fact that I could've done better. Verbal is a different cup of tea but DI/QA... I hate it when I get stuff wrong there.

Anyway, how did everybody else fare? I see the topper is one of our guys though I don't think he's posted here yet. I've been away from the comp since sunday and so haven't been too active except checking PG on my mobile occasionally.

Another sunday break from TIME this week. Hope the CL one's challenging. Can't wait.


I never gave up what I wanted. I never wanted what I gave up.

http://irrationalrationalities.blogspot.com/

My Mock Scores

Member - PG Dream Team 08
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
» Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to dheeraj138 For This Useful Post:
exile (08-10-2008), iceman3 (08-10-2008), implex (08-10-2008), karanmaroo (10-10-2008), Love_CAT (16-10-2008), maverick_srikan (08-10-2008), rahul_240488 (09-10-2008), sahilbansal (08-10-2008), sbahadur86 (08-10-2008), selebratinglife (08-10-2008), yogsconnect (09-10-2008)
  (#180)
varung varung is offline
3rd time .. I will not be denied!!!
Trainee PaGaL
 
Posts: 72
Join Date: Sep 2006
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 79
Thanked 336 Times in 59 Posts
Re: The PG Dream Team '08!!! - 10-10-2008, 11:20 PM

A long break from PG ... I guess a needed one at that
My comp gave up on me and office was a bit too busy ... to post anything ... plus the scores took a downward stroll ... thanks to VA and in parts to my stupidity ... some too silly to even quote here

Anyway, just a post to get back into the loop of things ....

And yes .. I also note that the DT thread is being out-run by the UDT thread ... by quite some margin!!!

<edit>: My post comes 2 days after Dheeraj's post!!! just to put things in better perspective
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usStumble this Post!
» Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to varung For This Useful Post:
maverick_srikan (11-10-2008), rik_12 (11-10-2008), srinibas (12-10-2008)
» Post Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

» Sponsors

PaGaLGuY.com is not responsible for the views and opinions of the posters.
PaGaLGuY.com is an Inzane Labs Private Limited production.