|
| CAT and Related Discussion Discuss information and B-schools under the toughest and most exclusive management entrance exam in India. The CAT - The Common Admission Test. |
|
View Poll Results: Which Sector You belong to?
|
|
IT/ITeS
|
  
|
254 |
67.73% |
|
Telecommunications
|
  
|
23 |
6.13% |
|
Banking/Financial Services
|
  
|
27 |
7.20% |
|
Automobiles
|
  
|
13 |
3.47% |
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
  
|
4 |
1.07% |
|
FMCG
|
  
|
3 |
0.80% |
|
Durables
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
Engineering
|
  
|
48 |
12.80% |
|
Retail
|
  
|
1 |
0.27% |
|
Others
|
  
|
18 |
4.80% |
|
has no status.
Hardcore PaGaL
Posts: 522
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Noida
Age: 25
Groans: 7
Groaned at 12 Times in 11 Posts
Thanks: 29
Thanked 261 Times in 174 Posts
|
Re: CAT 2008 for Working Professionals -
06-06-2008, 12:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by arun_juee
Hi,
Posting after long time.
In a certain pond, 50 fish were caught, tagged, and returned to the pond. A few days later, 50 fish were caught again, of which 2 were found to have been tagged. If the percent of the tagged fish in the second catch approximates the percent of tagged fish in the pond, what is the approximate number of fish in the pond?
1.400
2.625
3.1250
4.2500
5.10000
Please solve and explain.
P.S.-It may be a sitter but I didn't able to solve.
Later.
Arun
|
Let total fish be 'X' in pond and let 'P' be the percentage...
now (P/100)X = 50
and (P/100)50 = 2
Solving both, X = 1250
But i guess that the thread related to Quant. would hv been a better place for posting this,...
ATB
|
|
|
|
|
is back home
Newbie PaGaL
Posts: 18
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: .::::. NoIdA .::::.
Age: 24
Groans: 1
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 2
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
Re: CAT 2008 for Working Professionals -
06-06-2008, 12:34 PM
Hey been a dormant puy for a long time ... here goes my profile
B.Tech (CSE) from JIITU, Noida (Jaypee  ), 2007 passout.
Work ex 6 months at Infy
CAT History
CAT 2007 - Disaster .. awful prep totally mismanaged ... which showed in the results
CAT 2008 - Quant is the name of the game ...
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says NO Thank You to thandamunda For This Un-useful Post:
|
siddharthpareek (06-06-2008)
|
|
has no status.
Hardcore PaGaL
Posts: 522
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Noida
Age: 25
Groans: 7
Groaned at 12 Times in 11 Posts
Thanks: 29
Thanked 261 Times in 174 Posts
|
Re: CAT 2008 for Working Professionals -
06-06-2008, 12:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adityacooool
Arun,
1. The number of already tagged fish in the 2nd catch was 2. which comes to 4% of the total fishes caught in the 2nd try.
2. The total number of tagged fish in the pond after the secong catch was 98 (50+50-2) [Approximated to 100]
3. so as per the question, the number of the total %age tagged fish in the pond after the second catch= %age of fish found already tagged(in the 2nd catch)
=> 98 == 4% approx.
so total nmbr of fishes = 98/4%approx = 2500 roughly
Hope it was helpful to u and i did not confuse you even further 
|
Its nowhere mentioned in the Q that the fish were tagged after the 2nd catch also...
So the tagged fish count remains same, i.e. 50
|
|
|
|
|
Finally...
Addicted PaGaL
Posts: 1,111
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chennai
Groans: 414
Groaned at 377 Times in 173 Posts
Thanks: 1,885
Thanked 2,308 Times in 648 Posts
|
Re: CAT 2008 for Working Professionals -
06-06-2008, 12:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by arun_juee
Hi,
Posting after long time.
In a certain pond, 50 fish were caught, tagged, and returned to the pond. A few days later, 50 fish were caught again, of which 2 were found to have been tagged. If the percent of the tagged fish in the second catch approximates the percent of tagged fish in the pond, what is the approximate number of fish in the pond?
1.400
2.625
3.1250
4.2500
5.10000
Please solve and explain.
P.S.-It may be a sitter but I didn't able to solve.
Later.
Arun
|
I am unclear from the question that whether the fishes from 2nd catch were tagged or not, and because the answer depends upon the number of tagged fish in the pond and hence would like u to clarify the same.
Quote:
Originally Posted by adityacooool
Arun,
1. The number of already tagged fish in the 2nd catch was 2. which comes to 4% of the total fishes caught in the 2nd try.
2. The total number of tagged fish in the pond after the secong catch was 98 (50+50-2) [Approximated to 100]
3. so as per the question, the number of the total %age tagged fish in the pond after the second catch= %age of fish found already tagged(in the 2nd catch)
=> 98 == 4% approx.
so total nmbr of fishes = 98/4%approx = 2500 roughly
Hope it was helpful to u and i did not confuse you even further 
|
If all the fishes of second catch were tagged then answer as given by u is correct, but if fishes of the second catch were not tagged (i cant make it out from the question) then the answer would be 50/4% = 1250
Cheers
MK
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to monsterkartik For This Useful Post:
|
adityacooool (06-06-2008),
gantis (06-06-2008)
|
|
Sachin's more than half the team, statistically
proved :D
Certified PaGaL
IMI Delhi 
Posts: 2,108
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Delhi
Age: 24
Groans: 397
Groaned at 76 Times in 52 Posts
Thanks: 1,409
Thanked 2,068 Times in 967 Posts
|
Re: CAT 2008 for Working Professionals -
06-06-2008, 12:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by arun_juee
Hi,
Posting after long time.
In a certain pond, 50 fish were caught, tagged, and returned to the pond. A few days later, 50 fish were caught again, of which 2 were found to have been tagged. If the percent of the tagged fish in the second catch approximates the percent of tagged fish in the pond, what is the approximate number of fish in the pond?
1.400
2.625
3.1250
4.2500
5.10000
Please solve and explain.
P.S.-It may be a sitter but I didn't able to solve.
Later.
Arun
|
Please post QA questions on the relevant thread. A couple of them are mentioned below:
http://www.pagalguy.com/forum/quanti...-marathon.html (Quant Marathon)
http://www.pagalguy.com/forum/quanti...for-cat08.html (official quant thread for cat08)
|
|
|
|
|
is gearing up....
Expert PaGaL
Posts: 162
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Aamchi MUmbai
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 50
Thanked 22 Times in 12 Posts
|
Re: CAT 2008 for Working Professionals -
06-06-2008, 01:16 PM
hey all...
this post may contribute to 'Introduce urself 'thread as I remained silent for whole last yr.. 
But this yr I have geared up for the IIM race..With 2 yrs work ex at a software company  , I terribly want to change my profession...After the last yr weak attempt I am trying to be consistent and regular on PG..this will help me for sure..
PS: Please suggest me some ways to avoid silly mistakes  (if any)!
Calls- TISS -HR and GL
|
|
|
|
|
dreaming........
Trainee PaGaL
Posts: 52
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: chennai
Age: 29
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 411
Thanked 53 Times in 18 Posts
|
Re: CAT 2008 for Working Professionals -
06-06-2008, 01:34 PM
dear junta ,
count me in the list too. iam also a CAT veteran ,appeared for 3times . and raring to go for CAT 2008.
iam working in oil and gas industry with chemical engg background. having exp of 4 years .
messed up in quants in CAT 2007 ( overall :94 , with quants 40 ,verbal 99.7, and DI :90). hence i started my preperation with quant basics .
lets nail the CAT together.
cheers
|
|
|
|
|
has no status.
Newbie PaGaL
Posts: 3
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: chandigarh
Age: 22
Groans: 0
Groaned at 4 Times in 1 Post
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: CAT 2008 for Working Professionals -
06-06-2008, 03:30 PM
Hi.....Um starting to prepare for CAT'08..can anybody tell me the best institute for getting the course material only????
|
|
|
|
|
back in business!
Hardcore PaGaL
Posts: 375
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: KOLKATA
Age: 26
Groans: 5
Groaned at 50 Times in 16 Posts
Thanks: 399
Thanked 491 Times in 142 Posts
|
Re: CAT 2008 for Working Professionals -
06-06-2008, 05:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by loveekansal
Its nowhere mentioned in the Q that the fish were tagged after the 2nd catch also...
So the tagged fish count remains same, i.e. 50
|
This was really my confusion that 4% was 50 or 98?
Later I will post my other queries here.
Later.
Arun K Majumdar
CAT 2005 – IIM B, IIM K Calls – Didn’t appeared for GD PI
IIFT 2005 - No Call
CAT 2006 - Skipped
CAT 2007 - No Calls
CAT 2008 – IIM B-Rejected, IIM I-Convert but Not Joined, IIM L-Convert but Not Joined
FMS 2009 - MBA - Didn't appeared for GD PI
***** End of Story *****
|
|
|
|
|
back in business!
Hardcore PaGaL
Posts: 375
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: KOLKATA
Age: 26
Groans: 5
Groaned at 50 Times in 16 Posts
Thanks: 399
Thanked 491 Times in 142 Posts
|
Re: CAT 2008 for Working Professionals -
06-06-2008, 05:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by arun_juee
Hi,
Posting after long time.
In a certain pond, 50 fish were caught, tagged, and returned to the pond. A few days later, 50 fish were caught again, of which 2 were found to have been tagged. If the percent of the tagged fish in the second catch approximates the percent of tagged fish in the pond, what is the approximate number of fish in the pond?
1.400
2.625
3.1250
4.2500
5.10000
Please solve and explain.
P.S.-It may be a sitter but I didn't able to solve.
Later.
Arun
|
The answer is 3.1250
Later.
Arun K Majumdar
CAT 2005 – IIM B, IIM K Calls – Didn’t appeared for GD PI
IIFT 2005 - No Call
CAT 2006 - Skipped
CAT 2007 - No Calls
CAT 2008 – IIM B-Rejected, IIM I-Convert but Not Joined, IIM L-Convert but Not Joined
FMS 2009 - MBA - Didn't appeared for GD PI
***** End of Story *****
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| |