[social_loafer]

Originally Posted by azotae

u can censure anything..it exactly means 'criticise harshly' n thr is absolutely no conditions regarding its usage..it is just that we come acrooss peopl being censured more often, it seems like the only usage..but if u read film criticisms, u'll find this word used many a times..

(btw, i hav marked 'censored' :( )

do one thing put" critics censured movie" and google..the google says did u mean"critics censored movie "...chck out.....

[azotae]

Originally Posted by social_loafer

" how abt the critics in censor board...censoring the movie...because of social unacceptability...?"...censor board does have critics rite..further critics give opinion..abt the movie.....not harsh criticism...

Morover..the harsh criticism is for a person..or may be a director/producer of movie...how can u have harsh criticism for the movie???...it has to be censored...

PS: i think IIM shd outsource the CAT paper....they just cant make an unambiguous paper....

mate, 'censor' means to 'supress' or 'cut' or 'delete' a part (or entire) of a movie (or book)..now, censor board has a legitimate right to 'delete' scenes from a movie, a critic can only criticise it and do nothing to change its content..or delete a part (or parts)..a critic can NEVER censor (coz,and i repeat, censor means 'to delete')..
and regarding the 'critics in the censor board', they 'censor' (and it means they pick a scissor and 'cut' the reel out)..
i hop i have been able 2 clarify it..

[azotae]

Originally Posted by social_loafer

do one thing put" critics censured movie" and google..the google says did u mean"critics censored movie "...chck out.....

i donot understand this obsession wid googling for grammatic-dilemmas..!! do 1 thing write 'sushmita sein' and google..u'll find 'sushmita SEN' under the name 'sushmita SEIN'..does that change her name?? google doesnt do a grammer check..it just searches whatever is posted on the net..however incorrect..

[the_phantom]

Originally Posted by kondapalli

Sorry but my personal opinion is it should be censure. It has to be that. It can't be censor.
I don't wanna deprive someone of hope....but this is the correct ans.

Btw I attempted 16 and 6 are correct for sure. I attempted historians passage. all the 3 are wrong. Hoping for some change of Key. and also that detective wala I ans 5 option. i.e Her lack of psos was more than made up by ....

Pinnin my hopes on crazy IIM faculty.

I dont see how this contributes to the discussion...:angry:

[azotae]

Originally Posted by social_loafer

do one thing put" critics censured movie" and google..the google says did u mean"critics censored movie "...chck out.....

and i googled 'critics censure new movie' and got to the IMDB site, which uses censure for a movie (and not the director..)
u kno wot, if i am proved wrong by the iim, i'd b more than happy..coz i get 5 marks..!!)

[social_loafer]

Originally Posted by azotae

i donot understand this obsession wid googling for grammatic-dilemmas..!! do 1 thing write 'sushmita sein' and google..u'll find 'sushmita SEN' under the name 'sushmita SEIN'..does that change her name?? google doesnt do a grammer check..it just searches whatever is posted on the net..however incorrect..

dude..u were talking abt the usage of "censured" with critics....thats why i told u......abt theis google thing

morover...if u dont knw...the google algo for search is based ..on the usage of the phrase in the database..if u google...."critics censure movie"...and if its showing that " critics censored movie." ..then it means that the " critics censored movie" is used more number of times as compared to other one....

[anir-iim2005]

Originally Posted by social_loafer

dude..u were talking abt the usage of "censured" with critics....thats why i told u......abt theis google thing

morover...if u dont knw...the google algo for search is based ..on the usage of the phrase in the database..if u google...."critics censure movie"...and if its showing that " critics censored movie." ..then it means that the " critics censored movie" is used more number of times as compared to other one....

Buddy, something can be crticised harshly, but can't be snipped harshly. Period.


Anirban

[azotae]

Originally Posted by anir-iim2005

Buddy, something can be crticised harshly, but can't be snipped harshly. Period.


Anirban

thank u anirban..this is the first n last matter to be considered..that a critic cannot harshly 'cut' the movie.

[azotae]

and peopl..regarding the distrust / mistrust bit..
i talked to an english MA student (that is no authority i kno but evn thn) n she is absolutely sure abt distrust as the correct usage..!! (n i hav marked distrust, n i thot that mistrust is correct..had written a long msg alredy on this forum only..!!)
i just am in love wid iim..luk at how thy keep us occupied..!!evn aftr the exams..!!

[azotae]

Originally Posted by social_loafer

dude..u were talking abt the usage of "censured" with critics....thats why i told u......abt theis google thing

morover...if u dont knw...the google algo for search is based ..on the usage of the phrase in the database..if u google...."critics censure movie"...and if its showing that " critics censored movie." ..then it means that the " critics censored movie" is used more number of times as compared to other one....

my google doesnt suggest 'censored' wen i type 'censured'..moreovr, censor also is a noun..meanin people authorised to censor..morevr wen google says 'critics censor artistic freedom' it means that due to the attitude of critics, artistic freedom in no longer available..(as in it is 'deleted' , so to say..)

dude, i rest my arguments here..this has gone on too long..