[soumyajyoti]

Originally Posted by indian21r

So the IIM directors are meeting on 20th in New Delhi. Hope they can convince Arjun Singh to release the results.


@ Crazyphoton

Relax dude you don't have to go tru all the pages and graon at everyone. we understand you stand opposed to whatever we say.

Have a great day.

Cheers,
Rahul

BUddy don't you think it is too much of an uphill task convincing that thick head

[Mahip]

What is this thread for? -> Results Frozen ! Admission to ALL central institutes stayed !

What is the quality of the last few pages here, esp 1 liner off topic posts -> nearly ZERO!

What impression will the next CAT takers get from this thread abt users -> :huh:

"Will it come on 21st or 23rd?!" like posts will get you the result early? -> NO

Many of you might end up taking admission in IIMs by the end of this exam season, and I am sure you'll not like getting a tag of "spammer" from others. You all are mature users folks, but i'm sorry to say that some of the one liner off topic posts don't reflect any maturity. :neutral:

I'm still not closing this thread as you all would like to have a healthy discussion about result declaration. So kindly control your anxiety and stop posting un-useful messages. Self moderate please! Be a little disciplined and please don't start arguing here -> Send a PM instead! And stop groaning at every post like kids as if someone has taken away your candy! DO NOT REPLY to this message and argue further on this point. Use Thanks/Groan if you want to comment on my message. Thanks in advance for your support!

[neutral]

The article in ET says

"It seems the government’s argument is simple: violating the order of April 5 asking the IIMs to put the admissions on hold will be an act against the collective will of Parliament. Legal experts point out that there was no law guaranteeing 27% reservation for OBCs when the case was filed. Now, with a law in place, the OBCs, too, will have a case. "

Few days back we were discussing OBC's case and the articles mention that even OBCs have a case. Y not we all file cases against HRD Ministry & Arjun SIngh ?

[vaibhavthakur]

Originally Posted by neutral

The article in ET says

"It seems the government’s argument is simple: violating the order of April 5 asking the IIMs to put the admissions on hold will be an act against the collective will of Parliament. Legal experts point out that there was no law guaranteeing 27% reservation for OBCs when the case was filed. Now, with a law in place, the OBCs, too, will have a case. "

Few days back we were discussing OBC's case and the articles mention that even OBCs have a case. Y not we all file cases against HRD Ministry & Arjun SIngh ?

This story is taking all twists and turns. I am no legal expert but i think SC has full power to revoke/question any law or decision taken by the govt. I think the recent ruling on 9th schedule proves this. So, govt.'s argument of saying that holding the reservation will violate "law" will not hold.

Correct me if iam wrong.

The delay has already created problems especially for those who will be attending special course which will start in May itself. I really hope that IIMs put up a brave show in front of HRD and tell them the meaning of autonomous. Lets see what happens.

[Savant294]

Some more inputs
DNA - India - Centre asks IIMs to delay admissions - Daily News & Analysis

[neutral]

Originally Posted by Savant294

Some more inputs
DNA - India - Centre asks IIMs to delay admissions - Daily News & Analysis

"The ministry is writing to the IIMs, asking them to be patient. The IIMs, too, are willing to “accommodate” the government. “We may wait for some more time to bail out the Centre,” said an official of IIM, Ahmedabad."
- - Looks like we can forget about results coming on saturday. It wud b monday night i guess then.

"The ministry is treading cautiously in view of the risk of counter litigation by OBC students who have already made it to the IIMs under the quota system and are awaiting offer letters. For 17 OBC seats in IIM Ahmedabad, for instance, about 50 students were interviewed"
-- Even if its SC which has stayed the law, still OBC students have a right to file the case since they were promised seats under the law and the petition was filed before the OBC reservation was made into a Law. This is what i read somewhere.

[ismbaneeded]

Good morning folks,

So the Centre has asked the IIMs to delay the results.
And what will the IIMs decide by metting on 20th. What is wrong if the IIMs delcare the "without reservation" results today and then on Monday declare the other results if the Govt wins its case.
IIM A has said 21 and if it moves from that date, they should stop claiming themselves to be autonomous.

[neutral]

Originally Posted by ismbaneeded

Good morning folks,

So the Centre has asked the IIMs to delay the results.
And what will the IIMs decide by metting on 20th. What is wrong if the IIMs delcare the "without reservation" results today and then on Monday declare the other results if the Govt wins its case.
IIM A has said 21 and if it moves from that date, they should stop claiming themselves to be autonomous.

Again saying the same thing IIMs are not autonomous in all respects and they have a certain "Memorandum of Understanding" with Govt of India, which they have to adhere to. And even then IIMs will weigh the things before deciding the course of action. 2 days delay VS open confrontation with the govt.

However it would hv been far better had they let IIMs declare the results soon.

[prem_ravi]

Originally Posted by neutral

"The ministry is treading cautiously in view of the risk of counter litigation by OBC students who have already made it to the IIMs under the quota system and are awaiting offer letters. For 17 OBC seats in IIM Ahmedabad, for instance, about 50 students were interviewed"
-- Even if its SC which has stayed the law, still OBC students have a right to file the case since they were promised seats under the law and the petition was filed before the OBC reservation was made into a Law. This is what i read somewhere.

@Neutral Bhai,

Can u just explain me the above paragraph please

[neutral]

Originally Posted by prem_ravi

@Neutral Bhai,

"The ministry is treading cautiously in view of the risk of counter litigation by OBC students who have already made it to the IIMs under the quota system and are awaiting offer letters. For 17 OBC seats in IIM Ahmedabad, for instance, about 50 students were interviewed"

Can u just explain me the above paragraph please

See it means something like this though m no expert.

I guess we remember when CAT form was out there were no "confirmed" OBC reservation so we were asked to mention OBC in form subject the centre making it in a law. And at the sametime YFE filed the petition. However later on it was made into a law which was passed by parliament. In essence OBC students were promised by LAW that they have certail seats reserved for them. And the SC stay came when for IIMs (may b not IITs as their admission process hdnt started by then) they had gone one step ahead in their admission process. So these 17 students (in case of IIM A) have a right to ask the govt.

And m not saying abt legality of the result of their questioning govt bt they have a right.