Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nakul05
Guys, many ppl here feel that they have been penalised not keeping the FT as their 2nd option. Well, ppl, the FT is the flagship course at IMT.
So, the candidate who got anything beyond his 1st option wouldnt have got the FT anyways. (cutoff FT > cutoff of all other courses)
Lets say someone had options as: 1st: Fin, 2nd: IT, 3rd: FT
Well, in this case if the candidate couldnot get Fin, he wouldnt have got FT also, even if it had been his 2nd option. Hope u get the logic.
Arun n setformba, its ur right to fetch the info, and I never intent to sound otherwise.
|
OK, maybe my case will clear things up a bit. I opted for PGDBM Finance as my first option only because I thought FT will give me only Marketing and Operations. Had I known that FT offers everything, I would have gone for it and make no mistake, would have got it a well given my GDPI performance and 99%. Now, I have Finance Course & though it is a specialisation I would have taken anyway in my second year, I would still want to be exposed to a few mgmt. ubjects in my first year.... Don't know whether to be happy or sad on how it has turned out. I mean, I got finance which i always wanted.. the coure content is very intensively finance oriented but I loose out on a shot at Mrketing and other subjects, especially after knowing that IMT is basically a marketing insti...
Also, on top of that, I would be termed a someone from a non-flagship course, when I know I was good enough to get into the 'Flagship' Course (But that is not a big issue, really!!)
But you must know that IMT's 2007 batch has 180 students and currently, 60 of them have been turned into Finance whilt all the other courses were ther.. (Though with a different name)
Anyways, the point is to clear the case of the aggrieved party.. hope I've been able to do that.. !!