Quote:
Originally Posted by Tumtum Besides the reasons mentioned by Foobar, the main thing is that NCFM modules are plain bullshit. Totally crap and very poor in quality. Most elementary and basic stuff. It just a regulatory formality form traders and I don't think we should waste any efforts in doing such crappy certifications- they are not even paper tigers. For me, I personally cleared Derivatives core module without studying it and got 90% flat. Trust me on this guys, if you are not getting into trading for a broker, then don't even think of it. People will treat it as toilet paper. |
I agree that you get almost no learning from the NCFM modules,but I would still recommend them for ppl with no Finance background.
I remember when I was finishing college and was trying to apply to Finance companies with my Engineering education there was nothing much to write to show prospective employers about my passion and knowledge about the subject.NCFM was a rather inexpensive way to add a couple of more lines to your resume and I know it does not count for much but then there is no harm in doing it since you literally don't have to study anything and it is so cheap and can be done quickly.
Programs like CFA and FRM are better in the long run but what to do if I want to polish up my resume today? In that case NCFM is a good and cheap alternative for the time being.
Though I had read up Hull ,you very well cannot make statements that you have read so and so chapters from Hull in your resume so it is better to add any qualification however trivial to help you get shortlisted ,afterwards in the Interview it will really matter weather you read up Hull or know only what was in the NCFM modules.