it is d coz of the aec link, conglomerates, they and their are the words to think about.. d and b are outliers so hey can and shud be placed at the ends. however now that i think of it we can also put ace as a link so woh bhi ho sakta hai....
Globalisation itself is neither good nor bad. It has the power to do enormous good, and for the countries of East Asia, who have embraced globalisation under their own terms, at their own pace, it has been an enormous benefit, in spite of the setback of the 1997 crisis. But in much of the world it has not brought comparable benefits. _____________
A) Despite the failure, the fact remains that globalization has enormous potential.
B) Globalisation, thus has been redefined, purely based on its success.
C) The onus, therefore, to make it a success is on the people.
D) For many, it seems closer to an unmitigated disaster.
Globalisation itself is neither good nor bad. It has the power to do enormous good, and for the countries of East Asia, who have embraced globalisation under their own terms, at their own pace, it has been an enormous benefit, in spite of the setback of the 1997 crisis. But in much of the world it has not brought comparable benefits. _____________
Despite the failure, the fact remains that globalization has enormous potential.
Globalisation, thus has been redefined, purely based on its success.
The onus, therefore, to make it a success is on the people.
For many, it seems closer to an unmitigated disaster.
elimnate karta hun... option a is against the 1st sentence, where the passage clearly advcates a neutral opinion regarding globalisation, whereas option a , favours globalisation being called "good"
Option b, - out of scope.. redifining globalisation and sorts isnt mentioned...
Option c:- Sounds like a possibility, but nothing substantial has been mentioned in the passage regarding people misusing globalisation such that it becomes a failure..so we cannot say that the onus is on peple to make it a success, as the reason for it becoming a failure has not been thrust upon people..
Optiond :- most appropriately goes with the last sentence....just continuing the idea that it has been a failure too..so d
Globalisation itself is neither good nor bad. It has the power to do enormous good, and for the countries of East Asia, who have embraced globalisation under their own terms, at their own pace, it has been an enormous benefit, in spite of the setback of the 1997 crisis. But in much of the world it has not brought comparable benefits. _____________
A) Despite the failure, the fact remains that globalization has enormous potential.
B) Globalisation, thus has been redefined, purely based on its success.
C) The onus, therefore, to make it a success is on the people.
D) For many, it seems closer to an unmitigated disaster.
Globalisation itself is neither good nor bad. It has the power to do enormous good, and for the countries of East Asia, who have embraced globalisation under their own terms, at their own pace, it has been an enormous benefit, in spite of the setback of the 1997 crisis. But in much of the world it has not brought comparable benefits. _____________
A) Despite the failure, the fact remains that globalization has enormous potential.
B) Globalisation, thus has been redefined, purely based on its success.
C) The onus, therefore, to make it a success is on the people.
D) For many, it seems closer to an unmitigated disaster.
a. Even as a debate is on as to whether foreign companies should be allowed unfettered access to retail business, some large Indian conglomerates have entered the sector.b. Wal-Mart may not be in India yet, but its essence is already pervasive here.c. And, the tension that their entry has caused is palpable.d. There may indeed be a kernel of truth in the hyped-up belief that launching a "Retail Revolution" is an attempt to overturn the traditional way of selling goods.e. In the name of efficiency, and in the name of eliminating the much-abused middleman, they have already established niches in urban India and are aggressively expanding their operations.
A) dbaec
B) daceb
C) badce
D) daecb
A tricky affair. :mg:
cb is the link. Essence mentioned in sentence b in nothing but the tension hinted in sentence c.
Federer's fifth grand slam win prompted a reporter to ask whether he was the best ever. Federer is certainly not lacking in confidence, but he wasn't about to proclaim himself the best ever. “The best player of this generation, yes”, he said. “But nowhere close to ever. Just look at the records that some guys have. I'm a minnow.”
__________
(1) His win against Agassi, a genius from the previous generation, contradicts that.
(2) Sampras, the king of an earlier generation, was as humble.
(3) He is more than a minnow to his contemporaries.
(4) The difference between 'the best of this generation' and 'the best ever' is a matter of perception
Federer's fifth grand slam win prompted a reporter to ask whether he was the best ever. Federer is certainly not lacking in confidence, but he wasn't about to proclaim himself the best ever. “The best player of this generation, yes”, he said. “But nowhere close to ever. Just look at the records that some guys have. I'm a minnow.”
__________
(1) His win against Agassi, a genius from the previous generation, contradicts that.
(2) Sampras, the king of an earlier generation, was as humble.
(3) He is more than a minnow to his contemporaries.
(4) The difference between 'the best of this generation' and 'the best ever' is a matter of perception
Eliminate the options and then answer
option 3....option 2 presents a new idea(out of scope)...the last sentence has to be related to federer i felt...opotion 4 is too generic...we are not talking abt the difference in general but abt federer being the best ever...option 3 is better than option 1 as it carries the idea presented in the last line in a better way
Federer's fifth grand slam win prompted a reporter to ask whether he was the best ever. Federer is certainly not lacking in confidence, but he wasn't about to proclaim himself the best ever. “The best player of this generation, yes”, he said. “But nowhere close to ever. Just look at the records that some guys have. I'm a minnow.”
__________
(1) His win against Agassi, a genius from the previous generation, contradicts that.
(2) Sampras, the king of an earlier generation, was as humble.
(3) He is more than a minnow to his contemporaries.
(4) The difference between 'the best of this generation' and 'the best ever' is a matter of perception
E
liminate the options and then answer
option 3..... last line should continue idea presented in the penultimate statement... 2 & 4 bring a different idea altogether.... 1 can be a close option but the argument presented doesn't hold...hence 3
elimnate karta hun... option a is against the 1st sentence, where the passage clearly advcates a neutral opinion regarding globalisation, whereas option a , favours globalisation being called "good"
Option b, - out of scope.. redifining globalisation and sorts isnt mentioned...
Option c:- Sounds like a possibility, but nothing substantial has been mentioned in the passage regarding people misusing globalisation such that it becomes a failure..so we cannot say that the onus is on peple to make it a success, as the reason for it becoming a failure has not been thrust upon people..
Optiond :- most appropriately goes with the last sentence....just continuing the idea that it has been a failure too..so d
@nits2811 said:a. Even as a debate is on as to whether foreign companies should be allowed unfettered access to retail business, some large Indian conglomerates have entered the sector.b. Wal-Mart may not be in India yet, but its essence is already pervasive here.c. And, the tension that their entry has caused is palpable.d. There may indeed be a kernel of truth in the hyped-up belief that launching a "Retail Revolution" is an attempt to overturn the traditional way of selling goods.e. In the name of efficiency, and in the name of eliminating the much-abused middleman, they have already established niches in urban India and are aggressively expanding their operations.
The OA should be C...I think TIME has erred here...I also marked it as B....but for parajumbles the OA is not set by any institute like TIME...technically it's the author of the article who sets the OA...All coaching institutes just pick up any para from a article and jumble it...but still the OA is given by the author....It might be quite possible that there is another way presenting the thoughts of author for better coherence....but when a question is made from a para...in a way that coaching institute is acceding to the fact that...the way author has presented his/her ideas is the best way possible...!!!
which of these sections are easy to get score ? paragraph questions scramble questions vocabulary last sentence is deleted sentence correct plz give reply .....
