Fake news propaganda of it cell
New courses invented B.tech in pakoda MBA in pakoda B.Sc pakoda BBA pakoda .. desh badal raha hai... 2018 to b declared as pakoda year
Bhaion jitni bhi yojana bani thi sab hum engineers k hi kaam aati h current affairs m aur yojna ka implementation objective bnane m hi hota h exams m
Cut off mechanical ???
[poll type=regular results=always public=true chartType=bar]- 190
- <>\
200
-
185
-
195
Bhaiyon mane RTI daali thi regarding copy paaper 2 a letter i received on which it is written to deposit 62Rs. Plz if any one knows d procedure then plz tell where this money has to be deposited
Yar m BHI apana SSC je Ka paper ghar p manga Kar khud chek karanan chahata hu koi procedure h.
kal launde sb case karne ja rhe hain bhai log..
Jo BHI case Karne ja rahe h, khud APNI pair p kulhadhi marenge , DV k pahale karte to kuchh fayada HOTA lekin ab koi fayada Nahi.jb chidya chug gai khet tab kya pachhatana.
Koi ssc ko inform KR do ki case hone Wala hai ssc je par kal
Is bar SSC paper 2 Ka copy kaun chek Karega?
- Launde khud karenge
- PM
- Washington dc
- North coria sanki.
0 voters
JO CASE KARNE JA RAHA HAI WO SABSE RUPYA LEKAR BHAG JAYEGA
High Court cannot order revaluation of answer sheets: Supreme Court
J. VenkatesanNEW DELHI:, MAY 29, 2010 23:14 ISTUPDATED: MAY 29, 2010 23:14
High Court cannot order revaluation of answer sheets: Supreme Court
J. VenkatesanNEW DELHI:, MAY 29, 2010 23:14 ISTUPDATED: MAY 29, 2010 23:14 ISTSHARE ARTICLE
- 1
- A A A
In the absence of any provision under the Statute or Statutory Rules/Regulations, the High Court should not generally direct revaluation of answer sheets, the Supreme Court has held.A vacation Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar said: “It is settled legal proposition that the court cannot take upon itself the task of the Statutory Authorities. Further even the policy decision incorporated in the Rules/Regulations not providing for rechecking/verification/re-valuation cannot be challenged unless there are grounds to show that the policy itself is in violation of some statutory provision.”The Bench quoting an earlier judgment said: “It is exclusively within the province of the Legislature and its delegate to determine as a matter of policy how the provisions of the statute can best be implemented and what measures, substantive as well as procedural would have to be incorporated in the Rules or Regulations for the efficacious achievement of the objects and purposes of the [relevant] Act. The court cannot sit in judgment over the wisdom of the policy evolved by the Legislature and the subordinate regulation-making body.”Writing the judgment, Justice Chauhan pointed out that if there was a discrepancy in framing the question or evaluation of the answer, it could be for all the candidates appearing in the examination and not for the candidate concerned who approached the court.In the instant case, the Himachal Pradesh High Court had ordered production of the answer sheet and directed its re-evaluation and on that basis directed the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission to appoint the respondent, Mukesh Thakur, to the post of a Civil Judge (Junior Division). The present appeal by HPPSC is directed against this order.Allowing the appeal, the Bench said, “It is a matter of chance that the High Court was examining the answer sheets relating to law. Had it been other subjects like physics, chemistry and mathematics, we are unable to understand as to whether such a course could have been adopted by the High Court.”The Bench pointed out that there was no provision in the Rules for re-evaluation and since the respondent failed to secure the qualifying marks, he was not called for the interview. Therefore, the only order which the High Court could have passed was to direct the government to consider the respondent's case for relaxation of the marks, if such a course was permitted under the Rules, the Bench held and set aside the High court judgment.
High Court cannot order revaluation of answer sheets: Supreme Court
J. VenkatesanNEW DELHI:, MAY 29, 2010 23:14 ISTUPDATED: MAY 29, 2010 23:14 ISTSHARE ARTICLE
- 1
- A A A
In the absence of any provision under the Statute or Statutory Rules/Regulations, the High Court should not generally direct revaluation of answer sheets, the Supreme Court has held.A vacation Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar said: “It is settled legal proposition that the court cannot take upon itself the task of the Statutory Authorities. Further even the policy decision incorporated in the Rules/Regulations not providing for rechecking/verification/re-valuation cannot be challenged unless there are grounds to show that the policy itself is in violation of some statutory provision.”The Bench quoting an earlier judgment said: “It is exclusively within the province of the Legislature and its delegate to determine as a matter of policy how the provisions of the statute can best be implemented and what measures, substantive as well as procedural would have to be incorporated in the Rules or Regulations for the efficacious achievement of the objects and purposes of the [relevant] Act. The court cannot sit in judgment over the wisdom of the policy evolved by the Legislature and the subordinate regulation-making body.”Writing the judgment, Justice Chauhan pointed out that if there was a discrepancy in framing the question or evaluation of the answer, it could be for all the candidates appearing in the examination and not for the candidate concerned who approached the court.In the instant case, the Himachal Pradesh High Court had ordered production of the answer sheet and directed its re-evaluation and on that basis directed the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission to appoint the respondent, Mukesh Thakur, to the post of a Civil Judge (Junior Division). The present appeal by HPPSC is directed against this order.Allowing the appeal, the Bench said, “It is a matter of chance that the High Court was examining the answer sheets relating to law. Had it been other subjects like physics, chemistry and mathematics, we are unable to understand as to whether such a course could have been adopted by the High Court.”The Bench pointed out that there was no provision in the Rules for re-evaluation and since the respondent failed to secure the qualifying marks, he was not called for the interview. Therefore, the only order which the High Court could have passed was to direct the government to consider the respondent's case for relaxation of the marks, if such a course was permitted under the Rules, the Bench held and set aside the High court judgment.
Ssc je 2016 OBC safe rank
Ssc je 2016 me/ee me obc ko kitne rank tak department milne ka chance he.. If no one absent? I just count up to 400 rank.
bhaiyo Ek query h ...mere ek friend ne Rti lagayi thi ssc je ki copy mangane k liye uske ek 15 marks ka part uncheck reh gya h kya ho sakta h ? any one!
How many of mechanical guys are confident to get 125 marks atleast in pre 17....comment plzzzzz...real one ....dont fake