ShoutBox (Part 1)

@hanushanand said:
Yey! Ab to bandi khud hi line de rhi hai.. Pakad lo sir jee.. dekho Dulha/Dulhan to hai hi.. Pandit ji (Read: ME) bhi prastut hai yhaan pe.. chaloo SHAADI ho jaaye!
tumhe har sentence 'line' kyu lagti hai? 😲 arey wo apni duniya me khush hai aur main apni..kaahe barbaad karna chahte ho tum 2-2 zindagi!!
@aimingCAT12 said:
aisa lagaw hai to batana chahiye tha na..main khud hi chali jaati 'tumhari nazro se duur' aur kabhi laut k nai aati tumhari zindagi me *filmi ishtyle*
heehee! Mai Before SUnrise wala banda hoon.. mujhe ye B'Wood Bakar nhi aati raas.. :P
Jaana hi hai to saath me DATE pe chalo .. 😛
@hanushanand said:
heehee! Mai Before SUnrise wala banda hoon.. mujhe ye B'Wood Bakar nhi aati raas.. Jaana hi hai to saath me DATE pe chalo ..
dialog k baad i was about to puke myself!! heavy ho gaya tha :P
and you boy, don't bring up before sunrise/before sunset characters..i feel like watching it every now n then. jus can't stop admiring it..watta movie!!

Hey puys are these online CL sessions any good?

mtnl ki speed pe is it worth taking?
@aimingCAT12 said:
dialog k baad i was about to puke myself!! heavy ho gaya tha
and you boy, don't bring up before sunrise/before sunset characters..i feel like watching it every now n then. jus can't stop admiring it..watta movie!!
heehee! ab kya karoon.. wahi dimaag me aa jata hai.. apni Vaani sunkar .. :P

15999!

Aur ye, 16000!

@hanushanand said:
Aur ye, 16000!
@hanushanand said:
Arrey.. ab mai rha tuchh praani.. maine socha itne bade log.. jinke peeche already laakho ladke mar rhe hai.. Wo kya hamse baat karengi.. Unhe kahaan tym hoga... so aapko pareshan nhi kiya.. ab bas dekho aap ko chhodenge nhi..
hanushwaa pehle PAKAD k to dikha :grin:
Directions for question : The following question has a paragraph from which the last sentence has been deleted. From the given options, choose the one that completes the paragraph in the most appropriate way.
By propounding “Darwinism,” even scientists and science writers perpetuate an impression that evolution is about one man, one book, one “theory.” The ninth-century Buddhist master Lin Chi said, “If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him.” The point is that making a master teacher into a sacred fetish misses the essence of his teaching. So let us now kill Darwin. That all life is related by common ancestry, and that populations change form over time, are the broad strokes and fine brushwork of evolution. But Darwin was late to the party.


A. All Darwin perceived was that selection must work in nature, too.
B. That's why Darwin must go.
C. But there's a limit to how much credit is reasonable.
D. His grandfather, and others, believed new species evolved.
E. Scientists often attribute the success of a phenomenon to an individual, thus mitigating the magnitude of that particular discovery or innovation

Approach plz.
@hanushanand @YouMadFellow @aimingCAT12 @fisherking @Estallar12
@sabrinakhan said:
hanushwaa pehle PAKAD k to dikha
heehee! Aap khud hi kheeche chale aa rhe ho.. hame kya zaroorat pakadne ki.. 😛 ;)
@brixcel said:
ab ye kis khushi me??
@hanushanand said:
ab ye kis khushi me??
Light aa gayi isliye :lilangel:
@Ibanez said:
Directions for question : The following question has a paragraph from which the last sentence has been deleted. From the given options, choose the one that completes the paragraph in the most appropriate way.
By propounding “Darwinism,” even scientists and science writers perpetuate an impression that evolution is about one man, one book, one “theory.” The ninth-century Buddhist master Lin Chi said, “If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him.” The point is that making a master teacher into a sacred fetish misses the essence of his teaching. So let us now kill Darwin. That all life is related by common ancestry, and that populations change form over time, are the broad strokes and fine brushwork of evolution. But Darwin was late to the party.
A. All Darwin perceived was that selection must work in nature, too. B. That's why Darwin must go.
C. But there's a limit to how much credit is reasonable.
D. His grandfather, and others, believed new species evolved.
E. Scientists often attribute the success of a phenomenon to an individual, thus mitigating the magnitude of that particular discovery or innovation
Approach plz.
My take: A (preferably) or B ?? ye kisi Mock ka hai, I guess.. aur abhi saare VA gods bhi nhi hai yahaan pe.. !!
@abhibeloved yaha par @BABA_Pencho __/\__ ko kaun takkar de raha hai bey


@Ibanez said:
Directions for question : The following question has a paragraph from which the last sentence has been deleted. From the given options, choose the one that completes the paragraph in the most appropriate way.
By propounding “Darwinism,” even scientists and science writers perpetuate an impression that evolution is about one man, one book, one “theory.” The ninth-century Buddhist master Lin Chi said, “If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him.” The point is that making a master teacher into a sacred fetish misses the essence of his teaching. So let us now kill Darwin. That all life is related by common ancestry, and that populations change form over time, are the broad strokes and fine brushwork of evolution. But Darwin was late to the party.
A. All Darwin perceived was that selection must work in nature, too. B. That's why Darwin must go.
C. But there's a limit to how much credit is reasonable.
D. His grandfather, and others, believed new species evolved.
E. Scientists often attribute the success of a phenomenon to an individual, thus mitigating the magnitude of that particular discovery or innovation
Approach plz.
@hanushanand @YouMadFellow @aimingCAT12 @fisherking @Estallar12
Is it D?
@dj_harry said:
Is it D?
Yes sirrr. \\_______O// explain kar do plz. kya bakwas hai yeh. His grandfather may or may not belive in evolution . how do we know. and also how is it a good ending sentence?
@Ibanez said:
Directions for question : The following question has a paragraph from which the last sentence has been deleted. From the given options, choose the one that completes the paragraph in the most appropriate way.
By propounding “Darwinism,” even scientists and science writers perpetuate an impression that evolution is about one man, one book, one “theory.” The ninth-century Buddhist master Lin Chi said, “If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him.” The point is that making a master teacher into a sacred fetish misses the essence of his teaching. So let us now kill Darwin. That all life is related by common ancestry, and that populations change form over time, are the broad strokes and fine brushwork of evolution. But Darwin was late to the party.
A. All Darwin perceived was that selection must work in nature, too. B. That's why Darwin must go.
C. But there's a limit to how much credit is reasonable.
D. His grandfather, and others, believed new species evolved.
E. Scientists often attribute the success of a phenomenon to an individual, thus mitigating the magnitude of that particular discovery or innovation
Approach plz.
@hanushanand @YouMadFellow @aimingCAT12 @fisherking @Estallar12
is it E ?? :roll:
@brixcel said:
is it E ??
D :(