n(3n - 1) is a perfect sqWe know that n and (3n - 1) are co-prime to each other as 3(n) - (3n - 1) = 1So, we can say that for n(3n - 1) to be a perfect sq, both n and (3n - 1) has to be perfect squares, but (3n - 1) can never be a perfect square.Hence no such (k, n) are possible except (0, 0)
Nicely played chillfactor! That's the wholesome proof.
n and 3n-1 are coprime to each other.. so both should be perfect squares..and 3n-1 cannot be a perfect square as the square of an even number is always of the from 3n+1...hence...
First part of your explaination is fine but not the second part.
The reason for 3n-1 not being a perfect square is incorrect. For instance, 6 is an even number and its square is not of the form 3n+1.
All you need to understand is that any perfect square can be expressed as 3k or 3k+1 but not 3k-1. Why?
If b is an integer b can be of the form 3m, 3m+1, 3m-1
First part of your explaination is fine but not the second part.The reason for 3n-1 not being a perfect square is incorrect. For instance, 6 is an even number and its square is not of the form 3n+1.All you need to understand is that any perfect square can be expressed as 3k or 3k+1 but not 3k-1. Why?If b is an integer b can be of the form 3m, 3m+1, 3m-1 => b^2 can be of the form 3k or 3k+1
yes, you are right... all even numbers except 6..
if we take b = 3m, then it will be of the from of 3k
if we take b = 3m+1 , then it will be of the from of 3k+ 1
if we take b = 3m-1, then also it will be of the form of 3k+1
A={179,180,181,...360}.B is a subset of A such that the sum of no two elements of B is divisible by 9.The number of elements in B cannot exceed: a)81 b)82 c)85 d)101 e)102
3^6 when divided by 7 remainder is 1=> 3^(6k) will leave remainder 1 by 73^10 when divided by 11 remainder is 1=> 3^(10k) will leave remainder 1 by 113^6 when divided by 13 remainder is 1=> 3^(6k) will leave remainder 1 by 13So, we can say that 3^(30k) {30 is LCM of 6 and 10} will leave remainder 1 when divided by 1001Hence, 3^1001 will leave remainder 3^11 or (2187*81) or (185*81) or 971
Very good attempt!
Anyone with a different approach other than this one and the CRT?
A point P inside an equilateral triangle, ABC is located at a distance of 3,4 and 5 from A, B , C respectively. What is the area of the triangle.@iLoveTorres try karo!!
A property says that the sum of the distance of a point fom 3 sides in a equilateral triangle is equal to the altitude. So altitude = 3+4+5 =12 So side = 8 ˆš3 Area = 48 ˆš3
A point P inside an equilateral triangle, ABC is located at a distance of 3,4 and 5 from A, B , C respectively. What is the area of the triangle.@iLoveTorres try karo!!
A property says that the sum of the distance of a point fom 3 sides in a equilateral triangle is equal to the altitude.So altitude = 3+4+5 =12So side = 8 ˆš3Area = 48 ˆš3
This is Viviani's theorem that you are talking about but you cannot apply it here since the problem provides distances from the vertices of the triangle and not the perpendicular distances from each side.