GMAT Sentence Correction Discussions

Always remember that 'that' followed by a comma is more likely to be incorrect. And for me the main reason why E could be wrong is that includes many toys and electronics implies that 60,000 items include many... but the original sentence seems to imply that free shipping includes many... well the main diff between the two is that A implies free shipping includes 60,000 gift items and many toys... while E implies that free shipping includes 60,000 gift items, which in turn includes many....

Someone can correct if I am wrong


Thanks it makes sense now 😁

hi guys..i am starting my GMAt Prep from today, I plan tot take teh test in 3 months time.
I am engineer by background, hence my main area of concern in English....

GMATians please help me and tell me where do i start my GMAt Sentence correction and other Language related questions preparation......

Thanks in advance

Hi Puys,

Can someone please help me with the following usage?

1) so...that
2) so..as..to
3) which vs that

Thanks

Can some one explain why the answer here is A?

Starting Thursday, Wal-Mart Stores is planning to offer free shipping on its Web site on almost 60,000 gift items, including many toys and electronics

A. is planning to offer free shipping on its Web site on almost 60,000 gift
items, including
B. plan to offer free shipping on its Web site on almost 60,000 gift items,
including
C. plans to offer free shipping on their Web site on almost 60,000 gift items,
including
D. will plan to offer free shipping on its Web site on almost 60,000 gift items, including
E. is planning to offer free shipping on its Web site on almost 60,000 gift items, that include

Ans: is A can some one explain why not E
Explanation on SC grail says

The use of that to introduce a non-restrictive clause is incorrect on the GMAT, which should be used instead.

This website says that, 'that' could be used to introduce restrictive clause.
Clauses - Restrictive and Nonrestrictive

Kinda confused.

Thanks a lot,
Murthy


BTW OG 12 OA of 10 th SC problem tells that insistence on use of of "which" for non-restrictive clause is controversial, you may want to review. But i dont remember reading this term "non restrictive" clause in Manhattan guide
A majority of railway commuters reads or listens to music while traveling.

Grammatically correct/Incorrect ? :shocked:
A majority of railway commuters reads or listens to music while traveling.

Grammatically correct/Incorrect ? :shocked:


Incorrect - because in this I presume you would want to highlight individuality of commuter rather than totality so verb form should be plural.

A majority of railway commuters read or listen to music while traveling.
Incorrect - because in this I presume you would want to highlight individuality of commuter rather than totality so verb form should be plural.

A majority of railway commuters read or listen to music while traveling.


The sentence is correct, question of Manhattan Sentence correction (Subject Verb Agreement, Last Question).

I didn't get the logic.
The sentence is correct, question of Manhattan Sentence correction (Subject Verb Agreement, Last Question).

I didn't get the logic.


In edition 4 it says both. You can use singular to highlight totality, and plural for individuality.

Hello All,

Zeno's paradoxes are a set of problems generally thought to have been devised by Zeno of Elea to support Parmenides doctrine that "all is one" and that, contrary to the evidence of our senses, the belief in plurality and change is mistaken, and in particular that motion is nothing but an illusion.

This is the correct answer. I personally feel that 'and that'. It would be great to know why it is not wrong. The book says 'that' to ensure parallelism. Is this correct?

Any comments

Thank you in advance..

Best,
Murthy

Hello All,

Zeno's paradoxes are a set of problems generally thought to have been devised by Zeno of Elea to support Parmenides doctrine that "all is one" and that, contrary to the evidence of our senses, the belief in plurality and change is mistaken, and in particular that motion is nothing but an illusion.

This is the correct answer. I personally feel that 'and that'. It would be great to know why it is not wrong. The book says 'that' to ensure parallelism. Is this correct?

Any comments

Thank you in advance..

Best,
Murthy


why are you focussed on "comma". Besides comma I feel is correctly placed "contrary to the evidence.." is modifying "that" which is demonstrative pronoun, it is referring to what is in the doctrine.

Consider the sentence as :

Zeno's paradoxes are a set of problems generally thought to have been devised by Zeno of Elea to support Parmenide's doctrine -

that "all is one"
and that,......., the belief......,
and in particular that motion is nothing but.....

I hope the parallelism is evident from this....

Please share the source of the question as well as the other choices


Hello All,

Zeno's paradoxes are a set of problems generally thought to have been devised by Zeno of Elea to support Parmenides doctrine that "all is one" and that, contrary to the evidence of our senses, the belief in plurality and change is mistaken, and in particular that motion is nothing but an illusion.

This is the correct answer. I personally feel that 'and that'. It would be great to know why it is not wrong. The book says 'that' to ensure parallelism. Is this correct?

Any comments

Thank you in advance..

Best,
Murthy
Consider the sentence as :

Zeno's paradoxes are a set of problems generally thought to have been devised by Zeno of Elea to support Parmenide's doctrine -

that "all is one"
and that,......., the belief......,
and in particular that motion is nothing but.....

I hope the parallelism is evident from this....

Please share the source of the question as well as the other choices



Thanks for your reply. Cant it be parallel without that??

Murthy

Depends on the sentence construction


Thanks for your reply. Cant it be parallel without that??

Murthy

I have Aristotle SC Grail and Manhattan SC Guide? Do you guys think that this is enough for SC or should I go for some other books also ?

I have Aristotle SC Grail and Manhattan SC Guide? Do you guys think that this is enough for SC or should I go for some other books also ?

I have Aristotle SC Grail and Manhattan SC Guide? Do you guys think that this is enough for SC or should I go for some other books also ?

friendlyfire Says
I have Aristotle SC Grail and Manhattan SC Guide? Do you guys think that this is enough for SC or should I go for some other books also ?


Hi I think these books are enough. I was horrible with sentence corrections. Using these books has helped me improve significantly. I would personally suggest that you begin with the SC grain and then graduate to Manhattan. I think that would be very helpful.

Cheers,
Murthy
Hi I think these books are enough. I was horrible with sentence corrections. Using these books has helped me improve significantly. I would personally suggest that you begin with the SC grain and then graduate to Manhattan. I think that would be very helpful.

Cheers,
Murthy


Can you please share the SC Grail with me ?I really really need it. I started with Manhattan SC Guide but it doesn't start with the basics. Please help me.

Manhattan SC Guide doesn't start with the basics??? What are u saying man??? :wow:

Nowhere else u'll find a simpler approach to this topic.

mikeivy Says
Can you please share the SC Grail with me ?I really really need it. I started with Manhattan SC Guide but it doesn't start with the basics. Please help me.
Manhattan SC Guide doesn't start with the basics??? What are u saying man??? :wow:

Nowhere else u'll find a simpler approach to this topic.


i fully agree. Manhattan is in fact better than Grail. Grail is mostly developed by Indians and who can be more reliable about American English than American themselves, so I would go for Manhattan (old and reputed one), additionally there are few things said in MAnhattan such as avoid "progressive" tense to express future (such as I am going to meet you tomorrow vs I will meet you tomorrow); and avoid verb form "to be + to" such as "they are to have lunch together", whereas Grail uses these things in their examples as well as in theory. so I got confused and decided to stick to Manhattan prep material