My answers are 1. A and 3 E
For question no 2 i am not sure which of the statements are not an assumption.
Kindly help.
1. Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the chairman of a corporation to the stockholders.
A number of charges have been raised against me, some serious, some trivial. Individuals seeking to control the corporation for their own purposes have demanded my resignation. Remember that no court of law in any state has found me guilty of any criminal offense whatsoever. In the American tradition, as you know, an individual is considered innocent until proven guilty. Furthermore, as the corporation's unbroken six-year record of growth will show, my conduct of my official duties as chairman has only helped enhance the success of the corporation, and so benefited every stockholder.
Which of the following can be properly inferred from the excerpt?
(A) The chairman believes that all those who have demanded his resignation are motivated by desire to control the corporation for their own purposes.
- The argument does not talk about any beliefs of the chairman. (B) Any misdeeds that the chairman may have committed were motivated by his desire to enhance the success of the corporation.
- The argument does not say about any misdeeds. (C) The chairman is innocent of any criminal offense.
- He may not be innocent but it has not been proven.(D) The corporation has expanded steadily over the past six years. this can be correctly inferred. Based on the premise 1: "the corporation's unbroken six-year record of growth"(E) Any legal proceedings against the chairman have resulted in his acquittal. - this can be correctly inferred.Based on the premise 2: " Remember that no court of law in any state has found me guilty of any criminal offense whatsoever"I am not able to choose 1. 2. In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities.
Each of the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry. - The argument does not stand on this assumption. (B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.
- Yes this is an assumption and relates the quality of air to the sightings. (C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London. -
"Similar air-pollution rules" suggests that the problems are the same. (D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable. -
"rules should be imposed" suggest that it is desirable.(E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area. - Not an assumption. The argument does not draw any conclusion based on this assumption. Even if this is false the argument will exist. Maybe because of the improved quality of air the bird species visit London more often.Same for this one.
3. In the effort to fire a Civil Service employee, his or her manager may have to spend up to $100,000 of tax money. Since Civil Service employees know how hard it is to fire them, they tend to loaf. This explains in large part why the government is so inefficient.
It can be properly inferred on the basis of the statements above that the author believes which of the following?
I. Too much job security can have a negative influence on workers. -
True.
II. More government workers should be fired. -
Not true. Irrelevant.
III. Most government workers are Civil Service employees. -
Not true. Even if the civil service employees are less in number they could be a problem.(A) I only(B) I and III only (C) II only
(D) I, II, and III
(E) III only