cl promock 8 score(dont open if not given the test yet)

cl promock8 thread lets discuus :: was one of the easiest one:::::

cl promock8 thread
lets discuus
was one of the easiest one:::::

Gave the test today. Paper was quite easy.
OA 107
QA DI 65 (C23 W 4)
VA LR 42 (C18 W 12). This mock has the easiest RC section compared to that of the previous mock RCS. LR was tough with 8 analytical LR based question, 3 critical reasoning and 1 FIJ. But still I didnt expect to score this low in this section. :splat:

I have no clue how I ended up with such terrible scores.. Felt the mock was easy and should have score around 120 :(

QA 22 A 17 C 46 ( Don't know whats going on here)

VA ( 29 A 20 C) 51

Overall 97.. Sadness.. Should fall to 99.3x I guess!

Feel dwarfed

Section 1 - 11C 2W = 31

Section 2 - 16C 10W = 38

OA = 69

Some tips to attempt more in QA\DI would really help. Anyone ?

I have no clue how I ended up with such terrible scores.. Felt the mock was easy and should have score around 120 :(

QA 22 A 17 C 46 ( Don't know whats going on here)

VA ( 29 A 20 C) 51

Overall 97.. Sadness.. Should fall to 99.3x I guess!

OA 102
QA/DI 43 (17,15,2)
VA/LR 59 (29,22,7)

quant was easy, couldnt attempt many though

Qa/di : 45
va /lr :47

OA : 92 (has rarely ever happened with me scoring more in english than in quants :P)

couldnt solve a single LR set convincingly after having wasted around 30 mins on them.

English i felt was too easy.

QA/DI needs better planning than execution.

Gave the mock today

QADI --> 20A 16C 4W 44
VALR ---> 26A 20C 6w 54
OA -----> 46A 36C 10W 98

I think it was the easiest CL mock till now..
110+ is easily achievable (140+ by DT guys)

QA was very easy with many sitters..DI was a little time consuming
RC was easy to understand..LR leaving one set the others sets can be finished fast...

Disappointed with my performance.:banghead:

Hello everyone,
For admission queries on IIM Raipur visit
http://www.pagalguy.com/forum/cat-and-related-discussion/71075-iim-raipur-admission-policy-pgp.html

Thought I had good mock but seeing the scores posted above, my views have changed :splat:

OA: 88 (32C 8 W)

QA+DI : 53 ( 18C 1W)

LR+VA: 35 :splat:(14C 7 W)

Thought I had good mock but seeing the scores posted above, my views have changed :splat:

OA: 88 (32C 8 W)

QA+DI : 53 ( 18C 1W)

LR+VA: 35 :splat:(14C 7 W)


well i guess u can b happy abt ur accuracy...bt u may miss the VALR cutoff...or may b a marginal case u can expect around 97-98%ile i wld say...coz almost similar to PM7...rather a lil easy...

sec 1 : 30
sec 2 : 54
OA: 84 ..
seeing the above scores..seems I am going to miss the sec 1 cutoff for sure 😞

Looks like we have 2 threads going for Mock 8. Mods please check : http://www.pagalguy.com/discussions/cl-promock-8-scoredont-open-if-not-given-the-test-yet-25071045

My scores:

Section 1 :37
Section 2: 62

Overall 99

facing some issues with time allocation to DI/Quant in sec 1.... My scores are in the section are falling 😞

My scores :

Section I: 36
Section II: 54

OA: 90

Somewhat pleased that I have scored lot better in Sec I as compared to previous mocks, but no doubt, this mock was quite easier as compared to previous few.

The first section was comparatively easy...although Geometry was very tricky...
The LR was very frustrating for the 2nd section...with the Tendulkar Mallya problem eating into my time...plus critical reasoning was tough...
Still managed a pretty good score...
Section 1: 30A- 24C- 6W---66
Section 2: 28A- 20C- 8W---52
Total: 58A- 44C- 14W---118

Hello everyone,


I have missed proc 7. I want to know does CL provide the link for missed proc like TIME used to give all missed AIMCAT link in the end of all aimcats?

Or once you missed to give proc test( including the unproc mode for 3 days in the end of proc), you wont be able to write proc in the end?

If anyone has any idea from last year experience then please reply.

can someone plz mail me all the CL mocks....????
[email protected]
THANX..

can someone plz mail me all the CL mocks....????
[email protected]
THANX..


please remove the e-mail id as it is against PG norms....