This thread is to post scores and percentiles and discuss test-taking strategies, doubts, and queries for AIMCAT 2002.
VARC 45 (30A/18C) DILR 39 (13A/13C) QA 67 (26A/23C) OA 151
VARC :31 LRDI :44 QA:38 OA:113 After getting 167 in the previous AIMCAT, I don’t even know what happened in this.Is it just me or are people getting paranoid before CAT, thought I’ll get atleast 95+ in the last 5 mocks this f***ing most ruined it
QA sitters are stopping me to go pass them...after paying so much attention to them, still they give me an answer which is out of the options...AIMCAT questions or my girlfriend??
VARC- 44 DILR-45 QA-52 OA-141
VARC - 49 (19C/11W) [ bad! ]
LRDI - 51 (17/1W) [ was a 60 paper ]
QA - 46 (16C/3W) [ was a 55 paper ]
OA - 146[ 95ish again. BAD ]
VARC - 53 (28A/19C) ( Sluggish improvement) DILR - 47 (19A/16C) ( okay-ish, I guess) QA - 59 (23A/20C) ( 65+ would have been satiating) OA - 159 (overall accuracy improved a lot)
VARC - 45 (27A/17C) okay okay.
DILR - 51 (17A/17C) Good accuracy. could not attempt more due to time. have to increase speed.
Q - 28 (16A/10C) FACEPALM. Idk what happened, Just couldnt solve lt.(This is my strongest suit though)
Tot 124 (60A/44C) 150 was easily manageable.
VARC 76 Happy with this LRDI 49 Okayish QA 52 Don't know what happened here 😑 OA 177 Never thought that verbal would save me😅
VARC : 50 (Looks good)
LRDI : 26( FACEPALM )
QA : 45 (could have scored more)
OA : 125
VARC 40 (Depressing once again) LRDI 41 (was easily a 60+ paper) QA 52 (this was a tricky section) Overall 133 P.S It seems like VARC will ruin my first CAT attempt. Can't remember the last mock in which I scored 50+ in this section... :(
Which was more difficult?
- Aimcat 2003
- Aimcat 2002
VARC- 42 Bad LRDI- 51 QA- 37 Felt weird OA-130 20 Short
VARC -40 ;-(
DILR - 29 ACCURACY WENT FOR A TOSS
QA - 42 not good
OA : 111 (Lowest in this thread)
To cat retakers: Is this mock on line with the real CAT?
Those who gave CAT last year, can you guys please help me out in the below queries: 1. In the on-screen calculator, was the √ under-root function available? 2. Was the calculator allowing the candidates to do long lines of calculation simultaneously? Like if I have to calculate (7 + 239 / 23 - 21 + 3) would I have be able to input these numbers and operators one after the other to get the entire calculation done? Thanks in advance.
Happy that sections are balanced. Unhappy with VA. Frustrated about QA (but some big hitters have fumbled here so maybe it's not that bad).
Felt like a good paper overall.
Was there a lack of arithmetic questions in this mock?
I just remember coming across 3-4?