ShoutBox (Part 1)

Jobs & Careers
19808
@Omkarp said:
It is quite unfortunate that something or the other brings me back here.
Lekin ek review na padha hai na padhunga by god.
tum pakka joka jaoge..keep it up!! :D
19809
@fisherking said:
@anupam001
@YouMadFellow @anupam001 PC
I am sometimes attacked for imposing 'rules'. Nothing could be further from the truth. I hate rules.All I do is report on how consumers react to different stimuli. I may say to a copywriter, “Research shows that commercials with celebrities are below average in persuading people to buy products.Are you sure you want to use a celebrity?” Call that a rule? Or I may say to an art director,“Research suggests that if you set the copy in black type on a white background, more people will read it than if you set it in white type on a black background.”
(1) Guidance based on applied research can hardly qualify as 'rules'.
(2) Thus, all my so called 'rules' are rooted in applied research.
(3) A suggestion perhaps, but scarcely a rule.
(4) Such principles are unavoidable if one wants to be systematic about consumer behaviour.
(5) Fundamentally it is about consumer behaviour — not about celebrities or type settings.
CAT 06 again
Done this before, some PM question, 3) ?
19810
@fisherking said:
@anupam001
@YouMadFellow @anupam001 PC
I am sometimes attacked for imposing 'rules'. Nothing could be further from the truth. I hate rules.All I do is report on how consumers react to different stimuli. I may say to a copywriter, “Research shows that commercials with celebrities are below average in persuading people to buy products.Are you sure you want to use a celebrity?” Call that a rule? Or I may say to an art director,“Research suggests that if you set the copy in black type on a white background, more people will read it than if you set it in white type on a black background.”
(1) Guidance based on applied research can hardly qualify as 'rules'.
(2) Thus, all my so called 'rules' are rooted in applied research.
(3) A suggestion perhaps, but scarcely a rule.
(4) Such principles are unavoidable if one wants to be systematic about consumer behaviour.
(5) Fundamentally it is about consumer behaviour — not about celebrities or type settings.
CAT 06 again
3?...hame 2 baar tag kiya :lookround:
19811
@Sociopath said:
@fisherking
Dekha, maine bola tha na ...... no one can make inference of what you say. Hasne ki baat pe rota hai aur rone ki baat pe logo ko pakata hai ..... aur ha, jo baat tere bhalai me likhi jaye usse tu humorous samajhta hain .... lol .... chal koi nae... phir role
You should appreciate his effort to boost her morale instead of trying to make fun of him. At least he tried and trust me it was inspiring lines from him. So I'll appreciate if you'll encourage people like him instead of making such comment.

@fisherking Good work fella :clap:
19812
@fisherking said:
@anupam001
@YouMadFellow @anupam001
I am sometimes attacked for imposing 'rules'. Nothing could be further from the truth. I hate rules.All I do is report on how consumers react to different stimuli. I may say to a copywriter, “Research shows that commercials with celebrities are below average in persuading people to buy products.Are you sure you want to use a celebrity?” Call that a rule? Or I may say to an art director,“Research suggests that if you set the copy in black type on a white background, more people will read it than if you set it in white type on a black background.”
(1) Guidance based on applied research can hardly qualify as 'rules'.
(2) Thus, all my so called 'rules' are rooted in applied research.
(3) A suggestion perhaps, but scarcely a rule.
(4) Such principles are unavoidable if one wants to be systematic about consumer behaviour.
(5) Fundamentally it is about consumer behaviour — not about celebrities or type settings.
3 ?
19813
😛
19814
@fisherking said:
@anupam001
@YouMadFellow @anupam001 PC
I am sometimes attacked for imposing 'rules'. Nothing could be further from the truth. I hate rules.All I do is report on how consumers react to different stimuli. I may say to a copywriter, “Research shows that commercials with celebrities are below average in persuading people to buy products.Are you sure you want to use a celebrity?” Call that a rule? Or I may say to an art director,“Research suggests that if you set the copy in black type on a white background, more people will read it than if you set it in white type on a black background.”
(1) Guidance based on applied research can hardly qualify as 'rules'.
(2) Thus, all my so called 'rules' are rooted in applied research.
(3) A suggestion perhaps, but scarcely a rule.
(4) Such principles are unavoidable if one wants to be systematic about consumer behaviour.
(5) Fundamentally it is about consumer behaviour — not about celebrities or type settings.
CAT 06 again
3. Shayad dekha hai ye pehle.

@anupam001 said:
GP ki analysis kyun suni fir
Student reviews, I was expecting more from an insti professor, lekin woh bhi apne jaisi baatein kar rahe the, i.e. hawa main. No disrespect to him though, his tone was just to panicky for my liking. I listened for exactly 20mins.

@satyashiva.das said:
why boss
To avoid the madness.


19815
@fisherking said:
@anupam001
@YouMadFellow @anupam001 PC
I am sometimes attacked for imposing 'rules'. Nothing could be further from the truth. I hate rules.All I do is report on how consumers react to different stimuli. I may say to a copywriter, “Research shows that commercials with celebrities are below average in persuading people to buy products.Are you sure you want to use a celebrity?” Call that a rule? Or I may say to an art director,“Research suggests that if you set the copy in black type on a white background, more people will read it than if you set it in white type on a black background.”
(1) Guidance based on applied research can hardly qualify as 'rules'.
(2) Thus, all my so called 'rules' are rooted in applied research.
(3) A suggestion perhaps, but scarcely a rule.
(4) Such principles are unavoidable if one wants to be systematic about consumer behaviour.
(5) Fundamentally it is about consumer behaviour — not about celebrities or type settings.
CAT 06 again
3?
19816
@YouMadFellow said:
Done this before, some PM question, 3) ?
@anupam001 said:
3?...hame 2 baar tag kiya
Correct answer
PS:Vaani jee ki jagah aap tag ho gaye :P
19817
@fisherking said:
@anupam001
@YouMadFellow @anupam001 PC
I am sometimes attacked for imposing 'rules'. Nothing could be further from the truth. I hate rules.All I do is report on how consumers react to different stimuli. I may say to a copywriter, “Research shows that commercials with celebrities are below average in persuading people to buy products.Are you sure you want to use a celebrity?” Call that a rule? Or I may say to an art director,“Research suggests that if you set the copy in black type on a white background, more people will read it than if you set it in white type on a black background.”
(1) Guidance based on applied research can hardly qualify as 'rules'.
(2) Thus, all my so called 'rules' are rooted in applied research.
(3) A suggestion perhaps, but scarcely a rule.
(4) Such principles are unavoidable if one wants to be systematic about consumer behaviour.
(5) Fundamentally it is about consumer behaviour — not about celebrities or type settings.
CAT 06 again
2 ???

19818
@aimingCAT12 said:
3?
Correcto!!
19819
@abhibeloved said:
You should appreciate his effort to boost her morale instead of trying to make fun of him. At least he tried and trust me it was inspiring lines from him. So I'll appreciate if you'll encourage people like him instead of making such comment.
@fisherking Good work fella
Thanks bro!!!Chelsea-Tottenham aur Chelsea-United dekhega kya International break ke baad?? :P
19820
@anupam001 true man true...seriously madness
19821
@numerouno3987 said:
2 ???

The answer is very direct. With every statement of his, the author seeks to show how foolish those people are who call his advice 'rules'. After his first statement he has posed the rhetorical question “Call that a rule?”.The same should follow after his second “scarcely a
rule!”
19822
19823
@fisherking said:
@YouMadFellow @anupam001 PC
I am sometimes attacked for imposing 'rules'. Nothing could be further from the truth. I hate rules.All I do is report on how consumers react to different stimuli. I may say to a copywriter, “Research shows that commercials with celebrities are below average in persuading people to buy products.Are you sure you want to use a celebrity?” Call that a rule? Or I may say to an art director,“Research suggests that if you set the copy in black type on a white background, more people will read it than if you set it in white type on a black background.”
(1) Guidance based on applied research can hardly qualify as 'rules'.
(2) Thus, all my so called 'rules' are rooted in applied research.
(3) A suggestion perhaps, but scarcely a rule.
(4) Such principles are unavoidable if one wants to be systematic about consumer behaviour.
(5) Fundamentally it is about consumer behaviour — not about celebrities or type settings.
CAT 06 again
3
19824

12345

19825
@aimingCAT12 @YouMadFellow
A. Similarly, turning to caste, even though being lower caste is undoubtedly a separate cause of disparity, its impact is all the greater when the lower-caste families also happen to be poor.
B. Belonging to a privileged class can help a woman to overcome many barriers that obstruct
women from less thriving classes.
C. It is the interactive presence of these two kinds of deprivation 창€“ being low class and being female 창€“ that massively impoverishes women from the less privileged classes.
D. A congruence of class deprivation and gender discrimination can blight the lives of poorer women very severely.
E. Gender is certainly a contributor to societal inequality, but it does not act independently of
class.

(1) EABDC (2) EBDCA (3) DAEBC (4) BECDA
19826
@fisherking said:
@aimingCAT12 @YouMadFellow
A. Similarly, turning to caste, even though being lower caste is undoubtedly a separate cause of disparity, its impact is all the greater when the lower-caste families also happen to be poor.
B. Belonging to a privileged class can help a woman to overcome many barriers that obstruct
women from less thriving classes.
C. It is the interactive presence of these two kinds of deprivation €“ being low class and being female €“ that massively impoverishes women from the less privileged classes.
D. A congruence of class deprivation and gender discrimination can blight the lives of poorer women very severely.
E. Gender is certainly a contributor to societal inequality, but it does not act independently of
class.
(1) EABDC (2) EBDCA (3) DAEBC (4) BECDA
2?
19827
@fisherking 2