ShoutBox (Part 1)

Jobs & Careers
15205
@silent said:
In the first edition of 'Economics', Samuelson claimed that the Keynesian “theory of income
determination” was “increasingly accepted by economists of all schools of thought,” and that its policy implications were “neutral”. For example, “it can be used as well to defend private enterprise as to limit it, as well to attack as to defend government fiscal interventions.” However, his explanation of the model emphasized that “private enterprise” is afflicted with periodic “acute and chronic cycles” in unemployment, output and prices, which government had a responsibility to “alleviate”. “The private economy is not unlike a machine without an effective steering wheel or governor,” Samuelson wrote.
______________________________________
(1) By the seventh edition, Samuelson was no longer using the “machine minus the steering wheel” metaphor.
(2) By the fourth edition, he declared that “90 percent of American economists have stopped being 'Keynesian economists' or 'anti-Keynesian economists'.
(3) Compensatory fiscal policy tries to introduce such a governor or thermostatic control device. (4) He labeled this new economics a “neo-classical synthesis”.
(5) In reading Samuelson's early editions, a student might reasonably conclude that there are no other schools of thought.
(4) ??
15206
2500
15207
@saniyamakhijani said:
ilzaam nahi h.. scholar ho aap
You have made me blush.........Theek hain phir CAT ke baad mil lena ek date pe.....Tab toh free ho na aap?? :is growing desperate: :P
15208
@silent said:
In the first edition of 'Economics', Samuelson claimed that the Keynesian “theory of income
determination” was “increasingly accepted by economists of all schools of thought,” and that its policy implications were “neutral”. For example, “it can be used as well to defend private enterprise as to limit it, as well to attack as to defend government fiscal interventions.” However, his explanation of the model emphasized that “private enterprise” is afflicted with periodic “acute and chronic cycles” in unemployment, output and prices, which government had a responsibility to “alleviate”. “The private economy is not unlike a machine without an effective steering wheel or governor,” Samuelson wrote.
______________________________________
(1) By the seventh edition, Samuelson was no longer using the “machine minus the steering wheel” metaphor.
(2) By the fourth edition, he declared that “90 percent of American economists have stopped being 'Keynesian economists' or 'anti-Keynesian economists'.
(3) Compensatory fiscal policy tries to introduce such a governor or thermostatic control device. (4) He labeled this new economics a “neo-classical synthesis”.
(5) In reading Samuelson's early editions, a student might reasonably conclude that there are no other schools of thought.
3?
15209
@fisherking said:
You have made me blush.........Theek hain phir CAT ke baad mil lena ek date pe.....Tab toh free ho na aap?? :is growing desperate:
LoL.. roflll... :mg:
15210
@silent said:
In the first edition of 'Economics', Samuelson claimed that the Keynesian “theory of income
determination” was “increasingly accepted by economists of all schools of thought,” and that its policy implications were “neutral”. For example, “it can be used as well to defend private enterprise as to limit it, as well to attack as to defend government fiscal interventions.” However, his explanation of the model emphasized that “private enterprise” is afflicted with periodic “acute and chronic cycles” in unemployment, output and prices, which government had a responsibility to “alleviate”. “The private economy is not unlike a machine without an effective steering wheel or governor,” Samuelson wrote.
______________________________________
(1) By the seventh edition, Samuelson was no longer using the “machine minus the steering wheel” metaphor.
(2) By the fourth edition, he declared that “90 percent of American economists have stopped being 'Keynesian economists' or 'anti-Keynesian economists'.
(3) Compensatory fiscal policy tries to introduce such a governor or thermostatic control device. (4) He labeled this new economics a “neo-classical synthesis”.
(5) In reading Samuelson's early editions, a student might reasonably conclude that there are no other schools of thought.
3) hai kya ?
15211
@YouMadFellow said:
@lopagargg .. Kaise thursday ko hoga ??
8th May = Friday
10th June = Wednesday
9th June = Tuesday ?
8th may is thursday
April 1 Tuesday.
So april ends with Wednesday.
8th may is Thursday but given wednesday.
Plus days on june 9 and 10 are wrong.
Party date incidentally clear is on 8th May.
Day-Thursday.

15212
@YouMadFellow said:
3) hai kya ?
Sir jee.. LR/QA chaloo karo.. raat me VA nhi hota :/
15213

@saniyamakhijani said:
3?
correct OA 3
@YouMadFellow
@hanushanand
15214
@lopagargg said:
2500
Haan, Maine ek din extra calculate kiya hai

8th May = Thursday
9th June = Monday
10th June = Tuesday
15215
@silent said:
correct OA 3
@YouMadFellow
@hanushanand
Economics galat kaise kartii..:inlove:
15216
@hanushanand said:
Sir jee.. LR/QA chaloo karo.. raat me VA nhi hota :/
Main to raazi hu re.. Koi de to !
15217
@saniyamakhijani said:
LoL.. roflll...
Dekho @fisherking .. aisi hi karti hai ladkiyan.. pehle bade bade khwaab .. phir sab paani me mila deti hai.. kabhi clear answer nahi deti.. shayad isliye ladkiyan VA me by default strong hoti hai.. sirf unko hi samajh me ati hai aise ajeeb unclear cheeze !
15218
@fisherking -- VA khatam hogaya kya? :(
15219
@saniyamakhijani
@YouMadFellow
@hanushanand

Criticism is essentially a collective work which goes on from one age to another. No single critic can tell the whole truth about a great writer or speak with the same sureness all the time and no age ever has the last word. The critic can only interpret an author in the light of his own age. His successors will add something to his portrait, but they will also remove what no longer appears to be true.
_______________________________________
(1) The individual critic therefore can only make a contribution to a portrait which in the nature of things must remain unfinished.
(2) That is the justification of the critic and, indeed, of all criticism.
(3) It is not the critic's business to do 'the common reader's' work for him.
(4) The psycho-analytical critic claims that by examining the peculiarities of a writer's personality he is in a better position to interpret his work.
(5) His business is to stimulate the reader to make his own discoveries
15220
@YouMadFellow said:
Dekho @fisherking .. aisi hi karti hai ladkiyan.. pehle bade bade khwaab .. phir sab paani me mila deti hai.. kabhi clear answer nahi deti.. shayad isliye ladkiyan VA me by default strong hoti hai.. sirf unko hi samajh me ati hai aise ajeeb unclear cheeze !
Aap kyu dukhi h aaj.. pta chal raha h humein:p koi absent h..iska matlab yeh nahi ..ki aap sabke beech pange karvayein yahaan:/ 😞 :p
15221
@YouMadFellow
@hanushanand
Yeh lo tumhara QA qtn
Let n! = 1 × 2 × 3 × … × n for integer n>=1. If p = 1! + (2 × 2!) + (3 × 3!) + … + (10 × 10!), then p + 2 when divided by 11! Leaves a remainder of
(1) 10 (2) 0 (3) 7 (4) 1
15222
@silent said:
@saniyamakhijani
@YouMadFellow
@hanushanand
Criticism is essentially a collective work which goes on from one age to another. No single critic can tell the whole truth about a great writer or speak with the same sureness all the time and no age ever has the last word. The critic can only interpret an author in the light of his own age. His successors will add something to his portrait, but they will also remove what no longer appears to be true.
_______________________________________
(1) The individual critic therefore can only make a contribution to a portrait which in the nature of things must remain unfinished.
(2) That is the justification of the critic and, indeed, of all criticism.
(3) It is not the critic's business to do 'the common reader's' work for him.
(4) The psycho-analytical critic claims that by examining the peculiarities of a writer's personality he is in a better position to interpret his work.
(5) His business is to stimulate the reader to make his own discoveries
Option 1?
15223
@silent said:
@saniyamakhijani
@YouMadFellow
@hanushanand
Criticism is essentially a collective work which goes on from one age to another. No single critic can tell the whole truth about a great writer or speak with the same sureness all the time and no age ever has the last word. The critic can only interpret an author in the light of his own age. His successors will add something to his portrait, but they will also remove what no longer appears to be true.
_______________________________________
(1) The individual critic therefore can only make a contribution to a portrait which in the nature of things must remain unfinished.
(2) That is the justification of the critic and, indeed, of all criticism.
(3) It is not the critic's business to do 'the common reader's' work for him.
(4) The psycho-analytical critic claims that by examining the peculiarities of a writer's personality he is in a better position to interpret his work.
(5) His business is to stimulate the reader to make his own discoveries
1 ? .. :(
15224
@silent said:
@saniyamakhijani
@YouMadFellow
@hanushanand
Criticism is essentially a collective work which goes on from one age to another. No single critic can tell the whole truth about a great writer or speak with the same sureness all the time and no age ever has the last word. The critic can only interpret an author in the light of his own age. His successors will add something to his portrait, but they will also remove what no longer appears to be true.
_______________________________________
(1) The individual critic therefore can only make a contribution to a portrait which in the nature of things must remain unfinished.
(2) That is the justification of the critic and, indeed, of all criticism.
(3) It is not the critic's business to do 'the common reader's' work for him.
(4) The psycho-analytical critic claims that by examining the peculiarities of a writer's personality he is in a better position to interpret his work.
(5) His business is to stimulate the reader to make his own discoveries
1?