ShoutBox (Part 1)

@Estallar12 said:
Passage
Some libertarians and small-government conservatives, e.g. Ron Paul as well as think tanks such as the Ludwig von Mises Institute oppose the World Trade Organization. For example, Ron Paul says free trade agreements don't have to be 20,000 pages. In the February 1994 issue of Free Market, the Mises institute argued that "The WTO will convert peaceful trade into policy imperialism. It will allow economic exchange with some countries under approved conditions, and impose a variety of sanctions on others. The conditions will include all the legislation beloved of U.S. left-liberals, such as preferences for labor unions, artificially high labor costs, controls on the organization of industry, high taxes on capital and income, central-bank inflation, invasive tax collection, and the abolition of financial privacy. The goal, as with NAFTA, is to transform every country, developed or developing, into a carbon copy of Clintonian social democracy."
The passage supports which of the following inferences?
A.The WTO system offers governments a means to help the influence of narrow vested interests.
B.The WTO indulges in political interventionism.
C.The WTO is a dictatorial tool of the rich and powerful.
D.The WTO is anti capitalist.
E. The WTO is concerned only about commercial interests, and does not take account of development.
(a) All of the above
(b) A, C, and E only
(c) A, B, C, and D only
(d) C, D and E only
D?
@Estallar12 said:
Remainder ka queschen dikhte hi main sabse pehle Euler Sir ko hi yaad karta huun.
And use kiya na Euler maine - Euler (3) = 2 => 2^2 mod 3 = 1.
Euler --- Estallar...kaafi match bhi karta hai..
ussi se influence hoke naam karan to nahi kiya yahan PG pe. :P
@Estallar12 said:
Passage
Some libertarians and small-government conservatives, e.g. Ron Paul as well as think tanks such as the Ludwig von Mises Institute oppose the World Trade Organization. For example, Ron Paul says free trade agreements don't have to be 20,000 pages. In the February 1994 issue of Free Market, the Mises institute argued that "The WTO will convert peaceful trade into policy imperialism. It will allow economic exchange with some countries under approved conditions, and impose a variety of sanctions on others. The conditions will include all the legislation beloved of U.S. left-liberals, such as preferences for labor unions, artificially high labor costs, controls on the organization of industry, high taxes on capital and income, central-bank inflation, invasive tax collection, and the abolition of financial privacy. The goal, as with NAFTA, is to transform every country, developed or developing, into a carbon copy of Clintonian social democracy."
The passage supports which of the following inferences?
A.The WTO system offers governments a means to help the influence of narrow vested interests.
B.The WTO indulges in political interventionism.
C.The WTO is a dictatorial tool of the rich and powerful.
D.The WTO is anti capitalist.
E. The WTO is concerned only about commercial interests, and does not take account of development.
(a) All of the above
(b) A, C, and E only
(c) A, B, C, and D only
(d) C, D and E only
c ?? hai kya
@Estallar12 said:
Passage
Some libertarians and small-government conservatives, e.g. Ron Paul as well as think tanks such as the Ludwig von Mises Institute oppose the World Trade Organization. For example, Ron Paul says free trade agreements don't have to be 20,000 pages. In the February 1994 issue of Free Market, the Mises institute argued that "The WTO will convert peaceful trade into policy imperialism. It will allow economic exchange with some countries under approved conditions, and impose a variety of sanctions on others. The conditions will include all the legislation beloved of U.S. left-liberals, such as preferences for labor unions, artificially high labor costs, controls on the organization of industry, high taxes on capital and income, central-bank inflation, invasive tax collection, and the abolition of financial privacy. The goal, as with NAFTA, is to transform every country, developed or developing, into a carbon copy of Clintonian social democracy."
The passage supports which of the following inferences?
A.The WTO system offers governments a means to help the influence of narrow vested interests.
B.The WTO indulges in political interventionism.
C.The WTO is a dictatorial tool of the rich and powerful.
D.The WTO is anti capitalist.
E. The WTO is concerned only about commercial interests, and does not take account of development.
(a) All of the above
(b) A, C, and E only
(c) A, B, C, and D only
(d) C, D and E only
A
@Adiiiii said:
@Estallar12
bhai wat is the prerequisite to learn euler method ye mod and all ka basics pata hona chahiye kya ?
Nothing.
Euler ka formula that it it.

Euler of any number N = a^p b^q c^r ..... is given by --

E (N) = N* ( 1- 1/a) (1 - 1/b) ( 1 - 1/c) .....


Now, When a number M and N are coprime to each other, then - M^[k*E(N)] mod N = 1

Here, mod N implies remainder when divided by N and k is any natural number. :)
@milestogo3 said:
D?
@Maruti089 said:
c ?? hai kya
@blade014 said:
A
3 different answers and @Maruti089 got it correct.

Statement E is wrong because "and does not take account of development." is nowhere mentioned in the passage and hence, cannot be inferred. This eliminates Option A, B and D. Thus, Answer is option C. Ask doubts if any. :)
@Adiiiii said:
@Estallar12 gr8 bhai... it works for all problems of remainders or thr are some special cases also ?
Each and every problem having Coprime numbers M and N. Exceptions can be there, don't remember. :splat:
@Estallar12 said:
3 different answers and @Maruti089 got it correct.
Statement E is wrong because "and does not take account of development." is nowhere mentioned in the passage and hence, cannot be inferred. This eliminates Option A, B and D. Thus, Answer is option C. Ask doubts if any.
doubt tha, clarified now!
@Estallar12 said:
3 different answers and @Maruti089 got it correct.
Statement E is wrong because "and does not take account of development." is nowhere mentioned in the passage and hence, cannot be inferred. This eliminates Option A, B and D. Thus, Answer is option C. Ask doubts if any.
yo yo yo !! last line helped and options just udao E single option remians
@Estallar12 said:
3 different answers and @Maruti089 got it correct.
Statement E is wrong because "and does not take account of development." is nowhere mentioned in the passage and hence, cannot be inferred. This eliminates Option A, B and D. Thus, Answer is option C. Ask doubts if any.
last line of the passage...s telling something about developed/developing country...that baffled me.
did you find anything wrong in that method of tsd?
@Adiiiii said:
@Estallar12 coool bro any link where i can find the detailed tutorial of this euler formula ??
Yeah.
For Theory -
http://www.pagalguy.com/news/remainders-reloaded-euler-fermat-wilsons-theorems-cat-2011-a-19067

For Questions and some extra stuff -


@milestogo3 said:
last line of the passage...s telling something about developed/developing country...that baffled me.
Yeah that was kinda tricky. :)
did you find anything wrong in that method of tsd?
Nope. I don't think so. :banghead:

Subtracting the distance covered in 2 hours and then equating the two times is fine.
Also, Total distance upon relative speed = 4 hours seems fine.
But, Answer aayega hi nahin isse right ? Or you're getting some wrong answer ? :-/
@Estallar12 said:
Yeah that was kinda tricky.
Nope. I don't think so.
Subtracting the distance covered in 2 hours and then equating the two times is fine.
Also, Total distance upon relative speed = 4 hours seems fine.
But, Answer aayega hi nahin isse right ? Or you're getting some wrong answer ? :-/
this way i am not getting it. :(
but if i change my approach...then i am getting.
btw sir jee...hume bhi koi links de do practice/parne ke liee. be it
mensuration/some other good topics. :p

PG pe nightout maar liya! chala sone

ciao @Estallar12 , @lopagargg @YouMadFellow
cheers to another day. Good morning(night)

jaate jaate...kisi bade aadmi ne kaha hai-


Just focus, look for easy questions, solve them, move to the next question, repeat the algo...
Nail the CAT

@Mustang-Lee said:
_/\_ .. I am quoting the exact answer given is solution manual : 'Directed away' is not the correct usage.The sentence conveys that the people's attention was taken away from the civil war for some time . In this context, 'diverted' is a more appropriate word.You are correct too. I am confused now. Maine initially sahi kiya tha.....Bhalai ka jamana nahin raha
@Ibanez said:
I think divert away is the correct usage indeed. We can't "direct" something "away". either taken away or diverted away sounds fine.
Direct away is correct. I guess as mustang lee says, because it was directed away for quite some time, it's diverted and not directed. Directed away is for a very short period of time. Again, diverted away doesn't sound that good, diverted from sounds better :splat:
@Maruti089 said:
Oh you got that :P
Should the address in Identity Card match match with that of Admit Card of CAT exam ??


@karanthepagal said:
@junglii for ?

For ID verification at CAT center dude !

The CAT admit card of mine has a different address as compared to my ID proof that i intend to show for verification at the center. So , will that cause any problems. ??