@thePANDA Hey Brother there is an 'an' before the ___ and same is the case in the end. If you are using 'extricate' don't you think that we should use 'an; before it?
The team of 25 scientists from NASA, who arrived in Kathmandu on SAturday on a research mission, includes doctors, pilots and scientists. is this sentence correct ??
@sunny1987 seems like the correct one..but the catch here is "Subject" which is 'The Team..' so it should be followed by 'which arrived...' instead of 'who arrived..'
@sunny1987 said: The team of 25 scientists from NASA, who arrived in Kathmandu on SAturday on a research mission, includes doctors, pilots and scientists. is this sentence correct ??
shud not it be the team of 25 scientists from NASA, which arrived ,,,, because the pronoun used here is to refer to the team >??
Plagued by injuries, tennis celebrity Tracy Austin, who won the Italian and U.S. Opens at age 16 in 1979, sat out the years from :
IMO, it should be "who had the .." . As per the rule of tense about two past tenses. It should take past perfect tense for the earlier even and simple past for the latter.
He makes his writing easily comprehensible by using a very _______ language. But at times his writings seem very ______.
1. uncomplicated, pedestrian
2 > Khushwant Singh has been titled as an ____________ writer. But critics at times criticized him for writing in a ___________ manner. 3. amorous, carnal
@amresh_maverick said:@spectramind07Plz help:Plagued by injuries, tennis celebrity Tracy Austin, who won the Italian and U.S. Opens at age 16 in 1979, sat out the years from :IMO, it should be "who had the .." . As per the rule of tense about two past tenses. It should take past perfect tense for the earlier even and simple past for the latter.Plz correct me
no, we dont need perfect aspect.
1. When we write :
I had a book - its a simple past and not past perfect.
all perfect aspect are in the form - have/had/has + participle.
2. tense is the single most difficult topic for a non native speakers. if you are, then read number of articles from "the economist", "wall street journal", "new york times"...
here, we dont need past perfect. refer below for more general treatment :
a. show the sequence of two action. When the sequence is clear by the meaning, then there is no need to use perfect tense.
b. an action that started in the past but continue to the time frame of the sentence. Or an action that took place in the past, but the effect still persist in the time frame of the sentence.
now, you would easily know why there is no need of past perfect as there is no sequence to be clarified here.
this is not all -- consider this two sentence :
Within 10 years after my retirement, I had finished all my savings. - conventionally, it means that I expected my savings to last for 10 years, but finished before that. Within 10 years after my retirement, I finished all my savings. - The "expectation" doesnt comes here.
tenses are much more complicated than one can even think... !!!
The sentences are followed by options that indicate the words, which may be selected to correctly complete the set of sentences. From the options given, choose the most appropriate one.
The most important perquisite (A) / prerequisite (B) of the job is health insurance.
During the hearings the witness was willing to prevaricate (A) / procrastinate (B) in order to protect his friend.
While sleeping he had a presentiment (A) / premonition (B) that he would soon be offered a new job.
The precipitous (A) / precipitate (B) cover-up was botched and the swindlers were caught.
He had ambivalent (A) / ambiguous (B) feelings toward the handbook; sometimes it helped; sometimes it did not.