Just got my appointment letter by post..yay..Mumbai I am coming..
sbi special officer notification out...only for lawyers...many from pG can apply..jolly llbs....#repost
Here is the detailed Jugement....don't panic guys..
Court just asked SBI to reply their RTI letters. After that candidates can represent their case in a new form.
Now, SBI legal team is not so fool that they will reply in a manner so that this bewakuf candidates who didn't clear the overall cutoff get a chance to represent their case again.
SO WE ARE JOINING ON 29TH DEC, PACK YOUR BAG AND REACH TO YOUR DESIGNATED SBLC AT THE CORRECT TIME FOR FTP-1.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Decision: November 16, 2017
+ W.P.(C) 10147/2017 & C.Ms. 41461-62/2017 PRASHAN PRANAV AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Shiv Ram Singh & Mr. Ashutosh, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar & Ms. Krishna, Advocates for respondent No.1- UOI Mr. Anil Kumar Sangal, Mr. Siddharth Sangal & Mr. Abhay Kumar Tayal, Advocates for respondents No.1 & 2- SBI
1. Petitioners who are ten in number, pursuant to online advertisement by respondent-State Bank of India issued on 6th February, 2017 for the post of Probationary Officers, had appeared in the online examination for the said post. The results of the preliminary examination were declared on 16th May, 2017. W.P.(C) 10147/2017
2. According to petitioners, they had cleared the preliminary examination and they were called upon to participate in the main examination, which was descriptive one. The result of the main examination was declared on 24th October, 2017 and on 25th October, 2017, Score Cards of candidates were put on the website, from where petitioners claim to have learnt that respondents had not adopted the procedure of sectional cut off while preparing the merit list.
3. The grievance of petitioners put-forth is that one of the candidates had scored zero marks in one of the subjects but was still selected, whereas the candidates who had fared well in examination, have not been selected. It is also the case of petitioners that that they had sought online information on 27th October, 2017 under The Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI) and till date, they have not received any reply thereto. The online information sought by petitioners is as under:-
“1. What are the criterias that have been followed while allotting the marks in the interview. What were the parameters on which candidates were evaluated.
2. What are the minimum marks fixed for an interview that has been allocated to all the candidates.
3. Do interview and GD/GE panel at the LHO knew about the Mains exam marks.
4. Provide me with the mark sheet on which panel has given marks at the time of interview.
5. Can I have the marks of mains exam of all the shortlisted candidates. W.P.(C) 10147/2017
6. How come the SBI decided to do away with sectional cutoff when it is mentioned in the circular advertisement.”
4. Upon hearing and on perusal of Advertisement (Annexure P-2), copy of Online RTI Request Form details (Annexure P-8) and the material on record, I find that unless the information sought by petitioner No.1 in application under RTI is divulged to petitioners, they will not be in a position to effectively lay a challenge to selection in question.
5. Learned counsel for contesting respondents No.2 & 3 submits that if any application under RTI has been received from petitioners, then it would be positively responded to within a week from today.
6. While taking on record the aforesaid undertaking, it is deemed appropriate to permit petitioners to make a concise Representation on the basis of reply to their RTI application to assail the selection in question.
7. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that within two weeks of receipt of information under RTI from respondents No.1 & 2, petitioners would make Representations before the Head of Central Recruitment and Promotion Department, Corporate Centre, Nariman Point, Mumbai.
8. If any such Representations are made by petitioners to Head of Central Recruitment and Promotion Department, Corporate Centre, Nariman Point, Mumbai, then it be duly considered and decided within two weeks by passing a speaking order. The fate of the Representation be communicated to petitioners within a week thereafter, so that petitioners W.P.(C) 10147/2017 Page 4 of 4 may avail of the remedy, as available in law, if need be. It is made clear that aforesaid directions be strictly adhered to by the parties in letter and spirit.
9. With aforesaid directions, the writ petition and application are disposed of. DASTI to both the sides. SUNIL GAUR (JUDGE) NOVEMBER 16, 2017
Hahahahahahhahahahhahahaha
Its is mentioned everywhere that securing marks would be decided by the bank at every stage. Its Bank's right ki wo kitni bhi sectional cutoff rakhe ya na rakhe. I dnt think there is any ground of this case.
01:30 bje judgement ayegi bhai to yahan daal dena jaldi sham ko train h meri join krne k lye..jldi btana
Aa gaayi judgement.. As expected, case disposed off..
Hi Friends,
I have a query regarding SBI PO Selection.
I used to follow this page when I was waiting for SBI PO final result and it was fun following this page. SBI PO 2017 was my first bank exam and I missed out in the final selection list by 3 marks. Now I am planning to start my preparation for next year hoping SBI will release PO notification in 2018.
In last year's notification, it was mentioned "Candidates with record of default in repayment of loans/credit card dues and/or against whose name adverse report of CIBILor other external agencies are available are not eligible for appointment."
I have record of default in repayment of education loan. Now I closed my education loan through One Time Settlement this year. So I wanted to confirm before start preparing for SBI again.
Will it be a problem if we have default record in education loan repayment? Do they consider education loan repayment as well? Have anyone or any of your friends faced such issue while joining SBI this year? When will they validate and filter candidates by this eligibility criteria? Kindly share your experience and thoughts on this. Thanks
सच्चाई छुप नहीं सकती, बनावट के उसूलों से
कि खुशबू आ नहीं सकती, कभी कागज़ के फूलों से !
Hahahahha. Now I hope every banking examination organization takes a note of those who had filed case, and screw them over and over till they beg for mercy. :P
Sore loosers who couldnt do well in examination and cry foul after rejection. Also they claim that they have scored 180/200, 300/200 :P in CGL. I bet they will not be able to make to the final list of CGL even for 2400 GP post. Then they will file case against SSC and waste time of other candidates.
Kitna bhi case krlo , kitne bhi stay le aao , lekin Mandir to whi banaynge #jai shri ram
Update
This @sauravsp guy had told me not to enjoy to much after my selection bcoz according_to him my happiness would not have last for long...I had told him tht I will celebrate double thn wht I had planned...yes of course I enjoyed and celebrated...and now after this I ll celebrate 31st with double joy...not bcoz he lost...not bcoz he failed and frustrated ...this was my 4th attempt of sbi po....I failed to crack civils in last 4 attempts...I know wht failure is ....so I ll not make joke of anybodys failure...wht i'm angry on is...the way he threw his frustration on those who got selected ....he used abusive language...he used the sentence tht "people with bad interviews got selected "....he said people got posts through backdoor ...and blamed senior officers tht they got their own candidates selected "....it was a complete mockery of hard work of selected candidate ...a joke on their preparation ...all their efforts were like in vein after such allegations....thts why im gonna celebrate ...HC has given the justice to our efforts...and again the judgement is clear cut message to those who could not clear...not to blame others for ur failure.....
Here is the detailed Judgement. Read and show some pity to those BEWAKUF candidates.
Now, I am going to file a case. My demand is to restrict those candidates from future examination of SBI who tried to de-fame my organisation namely STATE BANK OF INDIA
http://lobis.nic.in/ddir/dhc/NAC/judgement/27-12-2017/NAC26122017CW115982017.pdf
Wonderful judgement by Delhi HC,wish it had slapped some penalty on the petitioners for filing a frivolous case.