Q)What will be the remainder when 111111111111111....................729digits is divided by 728? a)1 b)11 c)111 d)None of these
My take is 111
Any digit repeated 6k times is divisible by 7, 11 and 13. 728 = 7*8*13 So, 1 repeated 726 times will be divisible by 7 and 11. And if we place three 0s ahead of 726 times 1; number will remain divisible by 7 and 13 and it will also become divisible by 8 as last 3 digits are 0s.
So, remainder will be 111 as number is divisible 728
Q)What will be the remainder when 111111111111111....................729digits is divided by 728? a)1 b)11 c)111 d)None of these
Puys is there any general method ..or some specific techniques which will help to tackle such digit repitition problems ?? I am having a tough time solving these kind of problems ..It would be very kind of you to list these methods or provide a link where these methods are explained
Pls give full explanation : A number when successively divided by 3, 5 and 8 leaves a remainder 1,4, and 7 respectively. Find the respective remainders if the orders of divisors be reversed
1. What will be the remainder when (67^67 + 67) is divided by 68?
2. Which of the following will completely divide (49^15 - 1)? a) 8 b) 14 c) 48 d) 50
3. What will be the remainder when 17^200 is divided by 18?
4) It is being given that 2^32 + 1 is completely divisible by a whole number. Which is the number? a) (2^16+1) b) (2^16-1) c)7x2^33 d)(2^96+1)
5) Which one of the following will completely divide 3^25+3^26+3^27+3^28 ? a) 11 b) 16 c) 25 c) 30
1. (67^67)/68 is equal to ((-1)^67)/68. Therefore=> -1+67=66 is remainder. 2.48....StraightForward using Formula as the power is ODD 3.1 ...S//ly as question 1...((-1)^200)%18=1 4. 😞 Finding a better way.... 5.3^25(40). So its divisible by 30
1. (67^67)/68 is equal to ((-1)^67)/68. Therefore=> -1+67=66 is remainder. 2.48....StraightForward using Formula as the power is ODD 3.1 ...S//ly as question 1...((-1)^200)%18=1 4. 😞 Finding a better way.... 5.3^25(40). So its divisible by 30
See, the number was 67...wich is 1 less than 68(the number with which ur doing operation on 67)..so u can write (67^anything)/68 as (-1)^anything)/68 ....This step is done w.r.t. the number ur operating with.
For E.g.:- Its 67^300/50 =((+17)^300)/50 (s//ly for positive case as 67 is 17 greater than 50) OR 67^56/70 = (-3)^56)/70 P.S. Hope ur doubt is clear upto some extent..
See, the number was 67...wich is 1 less than 68(the number with which ur doing operation on 67)..so u can write (67^anything)/68 as (-1)^anything)/68 ....This step is done w.r.t. the number ur operating with.
For E.g.:- Its 67^300/50 =((+17)^300)/50 (s//ly for positive case as 67 is 17 greater than 50) OR 67^56/70 = (-3)^56)/70 P.S. Hope ur doubt is clear upto some extent..
First, we can take out 2 common from numerator and denominator and multiply by it in the end.
So, we have to first find out remainder of 2^1989 by (5*199) Remainder by 5: Euler's number for 5 is 4. 2^4k leaves remainder by 5 as 1. 1989 = 4k+1 => Remainder by 5 = 2^1 = 2
Remainder by 199: Euler's number for 199 is 198. 2^198k leaves remainder by 199 as 1. So, 1989 = 198*10 + 9 => Remainder by 199 = 2^9
So, we need a number of form 5a + 2 = 199b + 2^9 => 2^9 at b=0
So, remainder of 2^1989 by 5*199 is 2^9 => Remainder of 2^1990 by 2*5*199 is 2*2^9 = 2^10 = 1024
First, we can take out 2 common from numerator and denominator and multiply by it in the end.
So, we have to first find out remainder of 2^1989 by (5*199) Remainder by 5: Euler's number for 5 is 1. 2^4k leaves remainder by 5 as 1. 1989 = 4k+1 => Remainder by 5 = 2^1 = 2
Remainder by 199: Euler's number for 199 is 198. 2^198k leaves remainder by 199 as 1. So, 1989 = 198*10 + 9 => Remainder by 199 = 2^9
So, we need a number of form 5a + 2 = 199b + 2^9 => 2^9 at b=0
So, remainder of 2^1989 by 5*199 is 2^9 => Remainder of 2^1990 by 2*5*199 is 2*2^9 = 2^10 = 1024
Points:- 1. Euler number of 5 is 4 nt 1. 2. 5a+2=199b+2^9 .....if b=0,then a=? I mean what is the common term(number) for both the equations??? 3. You have taken 2 common from both denominator n numerator initially but in the last step u have multiplied the term wid 2(numerator wala) but wat abt the 2(denominator wala) wich u also taken as common in the initial step...????