You've got both the answers right. The first equation indeed gives a remainder of 22. Arun Sharma has a lot of incorrect answers, so better is to check it using a calculator.
Similarly, there's no way the 2nd question can have any other remainder apart from 1. So rest assured on that. If your methodology is right, your answers would be right too. Don't trust Arun Sharma's answers too much.
Can someone provide the link to the number sysrtm questions that were discussed were discussed on this thread so that i can put new question overe here in which i am having the problems and checking the one that have already been solved.
There are 205 pages on this thread and it is not possible for me to find the question related to number sutem:biggrin:
Can someone provide the link to the number sysrtm questions that were discussed were discussed on this thread so that i can put new question overe here in which i am having the problems and checking the one that have already been solved.
There are 205 pages on this thread and it is not possible for me to find the question related to number sutem:biggrin:
There are two threads completely dedicated to Number Systems:
Can you please explain me the above steps as why it was done like this only.
Please elaborate your point as well as why you split in 16^437 * 4 way only and 16/17 = -1 dividing first and then doing -1^437 *4 =-4 .
It will be very kind of you if you can provide the method as well in solving these type of questions
take the dividend closer to the divisor so that it may result in rem of +1 or -1, it helps in quick calculations as -1 or +1 raise to ny power can be calculated by just lookin at its power........
You've got both the answers right. The first equation indeed gives a remainder of 22. Arun Sharma has a lot of incorrect answers, so better is to check it using a calculator.
Similarly, there's no way the 2nd question can have any other remainder apart from 1. So rest assured on that. If your methodology is right, your answers would be right too. Don't trust Arun Sharma's answers too much.
Ca you please re-confirm the answers to these 2 questions as well
Ca you please re-confirm the answers to these 2 questions as well
As I said, you can check the 1st question by a calculator. And about the 2nd question, it has to be 1. This is because 43 = 1 mod 7, so 43 raised to any power would result in a remainder of 1.
hi! i've just started out with my cat 2010 preparation. need to give 1 decent try before completely abandoning this idea. need some help here, a number 20 is divided into 4 parts that are in an AP such that the product of the first and fourth to the product of the 2nd and 3rd is 2:3. find d largest part. :lookround:
hi! i've just started out with my cat 2010 preparation. need to give 1 decent try before completely abandoning this idea. need some help here, a number 20 is divided into 4 parts that are in an AP such that the product of the first and fourth to the product of the 2nd and 3rd is 2:3. find d largest part. :lookround:
let the nos. be : a-3d, a-d,a + d, a + 3d thn a = 5 also (a^2 - 9d^2) / (a^2-d^2) = 2/3 75 - 27d^2 = 50 - 2d^2 25 = 25d^2 1 = d^2 d = 1 largest part = 8
how did u get 'a' as 5 ? and a-2d, a-d, a, a+d, a+2d would be in ap. that would make it 5 nos. here we have just 4nos in ap. and d answer given in d book is 8.
a-2d, a-d, a, a+d, a+2d would be in ap. that would make it 5 nos. here we have just 4nos in ap.
hey srry dude i really m doin these silly err a lot these days, just coping up with the cat fiasco, anyways i have edit my earlier post, please chk it...